Literature DB >> 2323068

How should urinary cotinine concentrations be adjusted for urinary creatinine concentration?

S G Thompson1, R D Barlow, N J Wald, H Van Vunakis.   

Abstract

The correlation between cotinine concentrations in a single specimen of urine and in serum collected on the same occasion from 279 male smokers was 0.83. This was significantly increased, to 0.91, by adjusting the urinary cotinine levels for urinary creatinine concentration to take account of variations in urinary dilution between people. The adjustment used was based on the observed regression relationship between urinary cotinine and urinary creatinine concentrations. Expressing urinary cotinine values as a ratio to urinary creatinine, which has been used as a method of adjustment by others, did not improve the correlation between serum and urinary cotinine levels. The method of adjusting urinary cotinine for urinary creatinine is, therefore, important. The principle of such adjustment should apply not only to cotinine but also to other urinary biochemical measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2323068     DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(90)90114-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  20 in total

1.  A comparison of creatinine vs. specific gravity to correct for urinary dilution of cotinine.

Authors:  Joshua E Muscat; Anderson Liu; John P Richie
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Prevalence and associated demographic characteristics of exposure to multiple metals and their species in human populations: The United States NHANES, 2007-2012.

Authors:  Youn K Shim; Michael D Lewin; Patricia Ruiz; June E Eichner; Moiz M Mumtaz
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  Environmental and biological monitoring of exposures to PAHs and ETS in the general population.

Authors:  Noel J Aquilina; Juana Mari Delgado-Saborit; Claire Meddings; Stephen Baker; Roy M Harrison; Peyton Jacob; Margaret Wilson; Lisa Yu; Minjiang Duan; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  E Yano
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Biochemical Verification of Tobacco Use and Abstinence: 2019 Update.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; John T Bernert; Jonathan Foulds; Stephen S Hecht; Peyton Jacob; Martin J Jarvis; Anne Joseph; Cheryl Oncken; Megan E Piper
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). IX: Relationships of urinary albumin and N-acetylglucosaminidase to glycaemia and hypertension at diagnosis of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and after 3 months diet therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  Recent contributions of air- and biomarkers to the control of secondhand smoke (SHS): a review.

Authors:  Jacques J Prignot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Creatinine related reference ranges for urinary homovanillic acid and vanillylmandelic acid at 6 months of age.

Authors:  M Cole; L Parker; A W Craft; S Bell; G Dale; A C McGill; J A Seviour; J Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Cotinine concentrations in semen, urine, and blood of smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  M F Vine; B S Hulka; B H Margolin; Y K Truong; P C Hu; M M Schramm; J D Griffith; M McCann; R B Everson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Quantification of a methadone metabolite (EDDP) in urine: assessment of compliance.

Authors:  Michael E M Larson; Thomas M Richards
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2009-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.