BACKGROUND: Mechanical autotransfusion systems for washed shed blood (WSB) were introduced to reduce the need for postoperative allogenic blood transfusions (ABTs). Although some authors have postulated decreased requirements for ABT by using autologous retransfusion devices, other trials, mostly evaluating retransfusion devices for unwashed shed blood (USB), verified a small or no benefit in reducing the need for postoperative ABT. Because of these contradictory findings it is still unclear whether autologous retransfusion systems for WSB can reduce transfusion requirements. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether one such autologous transfusion system for WSB can reduce the requirements for postoperative ABT. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, we enrolled 151 patients undergoing TKA. In Group A (n=76 patients), the autotransfusion system was used for a total of 6 hours (intraoperatively and postoperatively) and the WSB was retransfused after processing. In Control Group B (n=75 patients), a regular drain without suction was used. We used signs of anemia and/or a hemoglobin value less than 8 g/dL as indications for transfusion. If necessary, we administered one or two units of allogenic blood. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (33%) in Group A, who received an average of 283 mL (range, 160-406 mL) of salvaged blood, needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood, compared with 23 patients (33%) in Control Group B who needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood. CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of an autotransfusion system did not reduce the rate of postoperative ABTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Mechanical autotransfusion systems for washed shed blood (WSB) were introduced to reduce the need for postoperative allogenic blood transfusions (ABTs). Although some authors have postulated decreased requirements for ABT by using autologous retransfusion devices, other trials, mostly evaluating retransfusion devices for unwashed shed blood (USB), verified a small or no benefit in reducing the need for postoperative ABT. Because of these contradictory findings it is still unclear whether autologous retransfusion systems for WSB can reduce transfusion requirements. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether one such autologous transfusion system for WSB can reduce the requirements for postoperative ABT. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, we enrolled 151 patients undergoing TKA. In Group A (n=76 patients), the autotransfusion system was used for a total of 6 hours (intraoperatively and postoperatively) and the WSB was retransfused after processing. In Control Group B (n=75 patients), a regular drain without suction was used. We used signs of anemia and/or a hemoglobin value less than 8 g/dL as indications for transfusion. If necessary, we administered one or two units of allogenic blood. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (33%) in Group A, who received an average of 283 mL (range, 160-406 mL) of salvaged blood, needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood, compared with 23 patients (33%) in Control Group B who needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood. CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of an autotransfusion system did not reduce the rate of postoperative ABTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: D Strümper; E W G Weber; S Gielen-Wijffels; R Van Drumpt; S Bulstra; R Slappendel; M E Durieux; M A E Marcus Journal: Transfusion Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Christoph Buchta; Beatrice Hanslik-Schnabel; Roman Weigl; Jana List; Günther F Körmöczi; Maria Macher; Harald Heinzl; Paul Höcker; Axel Wanivenhaus; Martin Kurz Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2005-10-10 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Nael Hawi; Daniel Oliver Kendoff; Udo Hessling; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Veronique M A Voorn; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Cynthia So-Osman; Ad A Kaptein; Anja van der Hout; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Ankie W M M Koopman-van Gemert; Albert Dahan; Rob G H H Nelissen; Thea P M M Vliet Vlieland; Leti van Bodegom-Vos Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Suma Choorapoikayil; Anke Wessels; Eva Herrmann; Kai Zacharowski; Donat R Spahn Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.889