OBJECTIVES: To investigate dynamic changes in human plasma β-amyloid (Aβ) concentrations, evaluate the effects of aging and amyloidosis on these dynamics, and determine their correlation with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ concentrations. DESIGN: A repeated plasma and CSF sampling study. SETTING: The Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with amyloid deposition (Amyloid+), age-matched controls without amyloid deposition (Amyloid-), and younger normal controls (YNCs) were enrolled for the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hourly measurements of plasma Aβ were compared between groups by age and amyloidosis. Plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ concentrations were compared for correlation, linear increase, and circadian patterns. RESULTS: Circadian patterns were observed in plasma Aβ, with diminished amplitudes with aging. Linear increase of Aβ was only observed for CSF Aβ in the YNC and Amyloid- groups, but not in the Amyloid+ group. No linear increase was observed for plasma Aβ. No significant correlations were found between plasma and CSF Aβ concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Aβ, like CSF, demonstrates a circadian pattern that is reduced in amplitude with increasing age but is unaffected by amyloid deposition. However, we found no evidence that plasma and CSF Aβ concentrations were related on an hourly or individual basis.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate dynamic changes in human plasma β-amyloid (Aβ) concentrations, evaluate the effects of aging and amyloidosis on these dynamics, and determine their correlation with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ concentrations. DESIGN: A repeated plasma and CSF sampling study. SETTING: The Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with amyloid deposition (Amyloid+), age-matched controls without amyloid deposition (Amyloid-), and younger normal controls (YNCs) were enrolled for the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hourly measurements of plasma Aβ were compared between groups by age and amyloidosis. Plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ concentrations were compared for correlation, linear increase, and circadian patterns. RESULTS: Circadian patterns were observed in plasma Aβ, with diminished amplitudes with aging. Linear increase of Aβ was only observed for CSF Aβ in the YNC and Amyloid- groups, but not in the Amyloid+ group. No linear increase was observed for plasma Aβ. No significant correlations were found between plasma and CSF Aβ concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Aβ, like CSF, demonstrates a circadian pattern that is reduced in amplitude with increasing age but is unaffected by amyloid deposition. However, we found no evidence that plasma and CSF Aβ concentrations were related on an hourly or individual basis.
Authors: N Andreasen; C Hesse; P Davidsson; L Minthon; A Wallin; B Winblad; H Vanderstichele; E Vanmechelen; K Blennow Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1999-06
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Matthew L Senjem; Vernon S Pankratz; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Mark A Mintun; Robert H Mach; Sang-Yoon Lee; Carmen S Dence; Aarti R Shah; Gina N LaRossa; Michael L Spinner; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Steven T DeKosky; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Diane Slats; Jurgen A H R Claassen; Petra E Spies; George Borm; Kees T C Besse; William van Aalst; Jack Tseng; Magnus J C Sjögren; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Marcel M Verbeek Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Andrea Weston; Neill R Graff-Radford; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor M Simonsick; Steven G Younkin; Linda H Younkin; Lewis Kuller; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Jingzhong Ding; Tamara B Harris Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: D Galasko; L Chang; R Motter; C M Clark; J Kaye; D Knopman; R Thomas; D Kholodenko; D Schenk; I Lieberburg; B Miller; R Green; R Basherad; L Kertiles; M A Boss; P Seubert Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1998-07
Authors: Jodi R Paul; Jennifer A Davis; Lacy K Goode; Bryan K Becker; Allison Fusilier; Aidan Meador-Woodruff; Karen L Gamble Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Ricardo S Osorio; Indu Ayappa; Janna Mantua; Tyler Gumb; Andrew Varga; Anne M Mooney; Omar E Burschtin; Zachary Taxin; Emmanuel During; Nicole Spector; Milton Biagioni; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Hiuyan Lau; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Shou-En Lu; Lisa Mosconi; Lidia Glodzik; David M Rapoport; Mony J de Leon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kenia Kelly Fiaux do Nascimento; Kelly P Silva; Leandro F Malloy-Diniz; Meryl A Butters; Breno S Diniz Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 4.791