Literature DB >> 23228623

Mechanics of overground accelerated running vs. running on an accelerated treadmill.

Ine Van Caekenberghe1, Veerle Segers, Patrick Willems, Thierry Gosseye, Peter Aerts, Dirk De Clercq.   

Abstract

Unsteady state gait involving net accelerations has been studied overground and on a treadmill. Yet it has never been tested if and to what extent both set-ups are mechanically equal. This study documents the differences in ground reaction forces for accelerated running on an instrumented runway and running on an accelerating treadmill by building a theoretical framework which is experimentally put to the test. It is demonstrated that, in contrast to overground, no mean fore-after force impulse should be generated to follow an accelerating treadmill due to the absence of linear whole body acceleration. Accordingly, the adaptations in the braking phase (less braking) and propulsive phase (more propulsion) to accelerate overground are not present to follow an accelerating treadmill. It can be concluded that running on an accelerating treadmill is mechanically different from accelerated running overground.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228623     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  11 in total

1.  Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill.

Authors:  Ine Van Caekenberghe; Veerle Segers; Peter Aerts; Patrick Willems; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neuromechanical adjustments when walking with an aiding or hindering horizontal force.

Authors:  A H Dewolf; Y P Ivanenko; R M Mesquita; F Lacquaniti; P A Willems
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Walking with increasing acceleration is achieved by tuning ankle torque onset timing and rate of torque development.

Authors:  Logan Wade; Jonathon Birch; Dominic James Farris
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.293

5.  Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities.

Authors:  Filipe A B Sousa; Fúlvia B Manchado-Gobatto; Natália de A Rodrigues; Gustavo G de Araujo; Claudio A Gobatto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Does an instrumented treadmill correctly measure the ground reaction forces?

Authors:  Patrick A Willems; Thierry P Gosseye
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Alteration of swing leg work and power during human accelerated sprinting.

Authors:  Ryu Nagahara; Takeo Matsubayashi; Akifumi Matsuo; Koji Zushi
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Modulation of leg joint function to produce emulated acceleration during walking and running in humans.

Authors:  Dominic James Farris; Brent J Raiteri
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces and Sagittal Knee Kinematics During Running Using Three Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Frank J Wouda; Matteo Giuberti; Giovanni Bellusci; Erik Maartens; Jasper Reenalda; Bert-Jan F van Beijnum; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Peak Running Velocity or Critical Speed Under Field Conditions: Which Best Predicts 5-km Running Performance in Recreational Runners?

Authors:  Diogo Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Diego Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Francisco de Assis Manoel; Fabiana Andrade Machado
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.