Literature DB >> 23228446

Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and sunitinib for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and as preoperative therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Matthew D Galsky1, Noah M Hahn, Thomas Powles, Beth A Hellerstedt, Seth P Lerner, Thomas A Gardner, Menggang Yu, Mark O'Rourke, Nicholas J Vogelzang, Darren Kocs, Scott A McKenney, Anton M Melnyk, Thomas E Hutson, Mary Rauch, Yunfei Wang, Lina Asmar, Guru Sonpavde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data support chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and sunitinib (GCS) in mUC and MIBC in parallel phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Trial 1 enrolled 36 patients with mUC who were chemotherapy naive; trial 2 enrolled 9 patients with MIBC. The primary endpoints for trials 1 and 2 were response rate and pathologic complete response, respectively. GCS was given as first-line treatment for patients with mUC and as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC. The Simon minimax 2-stage design was used for an objective response rate in trial 1 and for the pathologic complete response rate in trial 2.
RESULTS: The initial trial 1 GCS dose was gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously, days 1 and 8; cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenously, day 1; and sunitinib 37.5 mg orally daily, days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. These doses proved intolerable. The doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin were subsequently reduced to 800 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively, without an improvement in drug delivery, and the trial was closed. This lower-dose regimen was applied in trial 2, which was stopped early due to excess toxicity. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities occurred in 70% (23/33) of patients in trial 1 and 22% (2/9) of patients in trial 2. In trial 1, the response rate was 49% (95% CI, 31%-67%); in trial 2, the pathologic complete response was 22% (2/9). Due to early closure secondary to toxicity, the sample sizes of both trials were small.
CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of GCS was hampered by excessive toxicity in both advanced and neoadjuvant settings.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228446     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  25 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 2.  Targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Monalisa Ghosh; Sam J Brancato; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Phase Ib study of dovitinib in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Marshall Posner; Randall F Holcombe; Karen M Lee; Krzysztof Misiukiewicz; Che-Kai Tsao; James Godbold; Rothschild Soto; Kiev Gimpel-Tetra; Nancy Lowe; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  PF-03446962, a fully-human monoclonal antibody against transforming growth-factor β (TGFβ) receptor ALK1, in pre-treated patients with urothelial cancer: an open label, single-group, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  A Necchi; P Giannatempo; L Mariani; E Farè; D Raggi; M Pennati; N Zaffaroni; F Crippa; A Marchianò; N Nicolai; M Maffezzini; E Togliardi; M G Daidone; A M Gianni; R Salvioni; F De Braud
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Elevating the Horizon: Emerging Molecular and Genomic Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Metin Kurtoglu; Nicole N Davarpanah; Rui Qin; Thomas Powles; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Incorporating VEGF-targeted therapy in advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Sujata Narayanan; Sandy Srinivas
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 7.  The route to personalized medicine in bladder cancer: where do we stand?

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Chiara Ciccarese; Matteo Santoni; Matteo Brunelli; Alessandro Conti; Alessandra Modena; Rodolfo Montironi; Daniele Santini; Liang Cheng; Guido Martignoni; Stefano Cascinu; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Cabozantinib in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Rosa Nadal; Yusuke Tomita; Nicole N Davarpanah; Lisa M Cordes; Seth M Steinberg; Liang Cao; Howard L Parnes; Rene Costello; Maria J Merino; Les R Folio; Liza Lindenberg; Mark Raffeld; Jeffrey Lin; Min-Jung Lee; Sunmin Lee; Sylvia V Alarcon; Akira Yuno; Nancy A Dawson; Kimaada Allette; Arpita Roy; Dinuka De Silva; Molly M Lee; Tristan M Sissung; William D Figg; Piyush K Agarwal; John J Wright; Yangmin M Ning; James L Gulley; William L Dahut; Donald P Bottaro; Jane B Trepel
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  New treatments for bladder cancer: when will we make progress?

Authors:  Rosa Nadal; Joaquim Bellmunt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

Review 10.  The role of genomics in the management of advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Guancial; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.