| Literature DB >> 23227363 |
Zahra Pezeshki1, Mehdi Nematbakhsh, Safoora Mazaheri, Fatemeh Eshraghi-Jazi, Ardeshir Talebi, Hamid Nasri, Tahereh Safari, Azam Mansouri, Farzaneh Ashrafi.
Abstract
Introduction. Nephrotoxicity is one the side effect of cisplatin therapy and erythropoietin has been candidate as a nephroprotectant agent. However, its nephroprotective effect when it is accompained with estrogen has not been studied in female. Methods. 27 ovariectomized female Wistar rats divided into five groups. Groups 1 & 2 received estradiol valerate (0.5 mg/kg/week) for four weeks, and single dose of cisplatin (7 mg/kg, ip) was administrated at the end of week 3. Then the group 1 was treated with erythropoietin (100 U/kg/day), and the group 2 received vehicle during week 4. Groups 3 and 4 were treated similar to group 1 and 2, except for placebo instead estradiol valerate. Group5 (negative control) received placebo during the study. Animals were killed at the end of week 4. Results. In non-erythropoietin treated rats, cisplatin significantly increased the serum levels of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine (P < 0.05). However, these biomarkers significantly decreased by erythropoietin (P < 0.05). The weight loss, kidney weight, and kidney tissue damage score in rats treated with cisplatin but without estradiol were significantly less than the values in similar group when estradiol was present (P < 0.05). Conclusion. It seems that erythropoietin could protect the kidney against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. This protective effect was not observed when estrogen was present.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23227363 PMCID: PMC3503325 DOI: 10.5402/2012/890310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Oncol ISSN: 2090-5661
Figure 1Serum levels of BUN, Cr, nitrite, and uterus weight in five experimental groups. The signs stand for significant difference (∗) from OV group; (†) from OVE + CP + EPO group; (¶) from OV + CP + EPO group; or (#) from OV + CP + EPO, OV + CP, and OV groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Serum level of MDA, body weight change, KW, and KTDS in five experimental groups. The signs stand for significant difference (∗) from OV group; (†) from OVE + CP + EPO group; (¶) from OV + CP + EPO group; or (#) from OV + CP + EPO, OV + CP, and OV groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Kidney tissue images (magnification ×100). More tissue damages were observed in OVE + CP + EPO, OVE + CP and OV + CP groups.