Literature DB >> 23224389

Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis (type-1 proximal humeral fracture sequelae).

Grégory Moineau1, Walter B McClelland, Christophe Trojani, Adam Rumian, Gilles Walch, Pascal Boileau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty, performed without tuberosity osteotomy, for the treatment of secondary glenohumeral arthritis following posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis of the humeral head, defined as type-1 fracture sequelae.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients with type-1 fracture sequelae treated with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty were included in this retrospective single-center cohort study. All anatomic humeral prostheses were implanted without performing a greater tuberosity osteotomy. Glenoid resurfacing was performed in forty-four patients (80%). Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed at a mean of fifty-two months (range, twenty-four to 180 months) postoperatively.
RESULTS: Four reoperations (7%) were performed, including two revisions in patients who required glenoid resurfacing because of glenoid erosion after hemiarthroplasty. At the time of the latest follow-up, 93% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied, and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) was 81%. There were significant improvements in the mean Constant score (from 32 to 69 points), active anterior elevation (from 88° to 141°), external rotation (from 6° to 34°), and internal rotation (from the buttock to L3). Significantly poorer results were associated with proximal humeral deformity in varus and with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles. Patients with proximal humeral deformity, specifically varus or valgus malunion of the greater tuberosity, had a mean Constant score that was 10 points lower and active elevation that was almost 20° less than patients with no such deformity. The poorest results were observed in patients with varus malunion.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of type-1 fracture sequelae are good and predictable when deformation of the proximal humerus is acceptable(i.e., when no greater tuberosity osteotomy is necessary). The results were negatively affected by proximal humeral varus deformity and by fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff on imaging studies. In such cases, reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be more appropriate, especially in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224389     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  11 in total

1.  Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and atrophy are associated with functional outcomes in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Liangfu Jiang; Tinghua Zhang; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Posttraumatic arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint. From partial resurfacing to reverse shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  N Matis; R Ortmaier; P Moroder; H Resch; A Auffarth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae].

Authors:  C Gwinner; S Greiner; C Gerhardt; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: anatomical vs reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The reliability of the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures: a survey of orthopedic shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Mikaël Chelli; Gregory Gasbarro; Vincent Lavoué; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean-Luc Raynier; Christophe Trojani; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-26

6.  [Indication for primary fracture prosthesis of the shoulder].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The influence of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles on midterm functional outcomes in total shoulder resurfacing at six years' follow-up.

Authors:  Gray Ad Edwards; Philip A McCann; Michael R Whitehouse; Charles J Wakeley; Partha P Sarangi
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-11-14

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Santana; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Pau Guirro; Carlos Torrens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Proximal humeral fracture locking plate fixation with anatomic reduction, and a short-and-cemented-screws configuration, dramatically reduces the implant related failure rate in elderly patients.

Authors:  Antonio M Foruria; Natalia Martinez-Catalan; María Valencia; Diana Morcillo; Emilio Calvo
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-08-06

10.  Additional calcar support using a blade device reduces secondary varus displacement following reconstruction of the proximal humerus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marc Beirer; Moritz Crönlein; Arne J Venjakob; Tim Saier; Marcus Schmitt-Sody; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.