Literature DB >> 23224184

Optimal detection pinhole for lowering speckle noise while maintaining adequate optical sectioning in confocal reflectance microscopes.

Christopher Glazowski1, Milind Rajadhyaksha.   

Abstract

Coherent speckle influences the resulting image when narrow spectral line-width and single spatial mode illumination are used, though these are the same light-source properties that provide the best radiance-to-cost ratio. However, a suitable size of the detection pinhole can be chosen to maintain adequate optical sectioning while making the probability density of the speckle noise more normal and reducing its effect. The result is a qualitatively better image with improved contrast, which is easier to read. With theoretical statistics and experimental results, we show that the detection pinhole size is a fundamental parameter for designing imaging systems for use in turbid media.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224184      PMCID: PMC3412991          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.085001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  9 in total

1.  The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face.

Authors:  Pascale Guitera; Giovanni Pellacani; Kerry A Crotty; Richard A Scolyer; Ling-Xi L Li; Sara Bassoli; Marco Vinceti; Harold Rabinovitz; Caterina Longo; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Double-clad fiber for endoscopy.

Authors:  D Yelin; B E Bouma; S H Yun; G J Tearney
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Confocal theta line-scanning microscope for imaging human tissues.

Authors:  Peter J Dwyer; Charles A DiMarzio; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Geometric filter for speckle reduction.

Authors:  T R Crimmins
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1985-05-15       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Efficient rejection of scattered light enables deep optical sectioning in turbid media with low-numerical-aperture optics in a dual-axis confocal architecture.

Authors:  Jonathan T C Liu; Michael J Mandella; James M Crawford; Christopher H Contag; Thomas D Wang; Gordon S Kino
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Size of the detector in confocal imaging systems.

Authors:  T Wilson; A R Carlini
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Rigid confocal endoscopy for in vivo imaging of experimental oral squamous intra-epithelial lesions.

Authors:  Behnaz Farahati; Oliver Stachs; Friedrich Prall; Joachim Stave; Rudolf Guthoff; Hans Wilhelm Pau; Tino Just
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.253

8.  The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellacani; Pascale Guitera; Caterina Longo; Michelle Avramidis; Stefania Seidenari; Scott Menzies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Compact adaptive optics line scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Mircea Mujat; R Daniel Ferguson; Nicusor Iftimia; Daniel X Hammer
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.894

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy of esophageal tissues at 100 kHz line rate.

Authors:  Simon C Schlachter; Dongkyun Kang; Michalina J Gora; Paulino Vacas-Jacques; Tao Wu; Robert W Carruth; Eric J Wilsterman; Brett E Bouma; Kevin Woods; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Endoscopic probe optics for spectrally encoded confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Dongkyun Kang; Robert W Carruth; Minkyu Kim; Simon C Schlachter; Milen Shishkov; Kevin Woods; Nima Tabatabaei; Tao Wu; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Digital adaptive optics line-scanning confocal imaging system.

Authors:  Changgeng Liu; Myung K Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Spectrally encoded coherence tomography and reflectometry: Simultaneous en face and cross-sectional imaging at 2 gigapixels per second.

Authors:  Mohamed T El-Haddad; Ivan Bozic; Yuankai K Tao
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Tri-modal microscope for head and neck tissue identification.

Authors:  Etienne De Montigny; Nadir Goulamhoussen; Wendy-Julie Madore; Mathias Strupler; Olguta Ecaterina Gologan; Tareck Ayad; Caroline Boudoux
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Wide-field imaging combined with confocal microscopy using a miniature f/5 camera integrated within a high NA objective lens.

Authors:  David L Dickensheets; Seth Kreitinger; Gary Peterson; Michael Heger; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Comparison of line-scanned and point-scanned dual-axis confocal microscope performance.

Authors:  D Wang; Y Chen; Y Wang; J T C Liu
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Unsupervised delineation of stratum corneum using reflectance confocal microscopy and spectral clustering.

Authors:  A Bozkurt; K Kose; C Alessi-Fox; J G Dy; D H Brooks; M Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  DeepLSR: a deep learning approach for laser speckle reduction.

Authors:  Taylor L Bobrow; Faisal Mahmood; Miguel Inserni; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  A coherent model for turbid imaging with confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Christopher E Glazowski; James Zavislan
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.