BACKGROUND: Treatment fidelity, also called intervention fidelity, is an important component of testing treatment efficacy. Although examples of strategies needed to address treatment fidelity have been provided in several published reports, data describing variations that might compromise efficacy testing have been omitted. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe treatment fidelity monitoring strategies and data within the context of a nursing clinical trial. METHODS: A three-group, randomized, controlled trial compared intervention (paced respiration) to attention control (fast, shallow breathing) to usual care for management of hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms. Data from both staff and participants were collected to assess treatment fidelity. RESULTS: Staff measures for treatment delivery indicated good adherence to protocols. Participant ratings of expectancy and credibility were not statistically different between intervention and attention control; however, the attention control was significantly more acceptable (p < .05). Intervention participant data indicated good treatment receipt and enactment with mean breath rates at each time point falling within the target range. Practice log data for both intervention and attention control indicated lower adherence of once-daily rather than twice-daily practice. DISCUSSION: Despite strengths in fidelity monitoring, some challenges were identified that have implications for other similar intervention studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment fidelity, also called intervention fidelity, is an important component of testing treatment efficacy. Although examples of strategies needed to address treatment fidelity have been provided in several published reports, data describing variations that might compromise efficacy testing have been omitted. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe treatment fidelity monitoring strategies and data within the context of a nursing clinical trial. METHODS: A three-group, randomized, controlled trial compared intervention (paced respiration) to attention control (fast, shallow breathing) to usual care for management of hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms. Data from both staff and participants were collected to assess treatment fidelity. RESULTS: Staff measures for treatment delivery indicated good adherence to protocols. Participant ratings of expectancy and credibility were not statistically different between intervention and attention control; however, the attention control was significantly more acceptable (p < .05). Intervention participant data indicated good treatment receipt and enactment with mean breath rates at each time point falling within the target range. Practice log data for both intervention and attention control indicated lower adherence of once-daily rather than twice-daily practice. DISCUSSION: Despite strengths in fidelity monitoring, some challenges were identified that have implications for other similar intervention studies.
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Albert J Bellg; Belinda Borrelli; Carol Defrancesco; Rosemary Breger; Jacki Hecht; Daryl L Sharp; Chantal Levesque; Denise Orwig; Denise Ernst; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Susan Czajkowski Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2005-04
Authors: Valerie Spillane; Mary C Byrne; Molly Byrne; Claire S Leathem; Mary O'Malley; Margaret E Cupples Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Janet S Carpenter; Jennifer G Neal; Judith Payne; Gretchen Kimmick; Anna Maria Storniolo Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Mary H Wilde; Dianne Liebel; Eileen Fairbanks; Paula Wilson; Margaret Lash; Shivani Shah; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; Feng Zhang; Eileen Scheid; James M McMahon Journal: Home Health Care Serv Q Date: 2015 Apr-Jun
Authors: Liane R Ginsburg; Matthias Hoben; Adam Easterbrook; Ruth A Anderson; Carole A Estabrooks; Peter G Norton Journal: Trials Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Paul A Salamh; William J Hanney; Christopher S Cory; Haley E Condon; Xinliang Liu; Morey J Kolber Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Brigit M Chesworth; Michael J Leathley; Lois H Thomas; Christopher J Sutton; Denise Forshaw; Caroline L Watkins Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 4.615