Literature DB >> 17908130

Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention.

Valerie Spillane1, Mary C Byrne, Molly Byrne, Claire S Leathem, Mary O'Malley, Margaret E Cupples.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a study to describe how treatment fidelity is being enhanced and monitored, using a model from the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium.
BACKGROUND: The objective of treatment fidelity is to minimize errors in interpreting research trial outcomes, and to ascribe those outcomes directly to the intervention at hand. Treatment fidelity procedures are included in trials of complex interventions to account for inferences made from study outcomes. Monitoring treatment fidelity can help improve study design, maximize reliability of results, increase statistical power, determine whether theory-based interventions are responsible for observed changes, and inform the research dissemination process.
METHODS: Treatment fidelity recommendations from the Behavior Change Consortium were applied to the SPHERE study (Secondary Prevention of Heart DiseasE in GeneRal PracticE), a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention. Procedures to enhance and monitor intervention implementation included standardizing training sessions, observing intervention consultations, structuring patient recall systems, and using written practice and patient care plans. The research nurse plays an important role in monitoring intervention implementation.
FINDINGS: Several methods of applying treatment fidelity procedures to monitoring interventions are possible. The procedure used may be determined by availability of appropriate personnel, fiscal constraints, or time limits. Complex interventions are not straightforward and necessitate a monitoring process at trial stage.
CONCLUSION: The Behavior Change Consortium's model of treatment fidelity is useful for structuring a system to monitor the implementation of a complex intervention, and helps to increase the reliability and validity of evaluation findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17908130     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04386.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  33 in total

1.  The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Belinda Borrelli
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.821

2.  Measuring treatment fidelity in a rehabilitation intervention study.

Authors:  Mary W Hildebrand; Helen H Host; Ellen F Binder; Brian Carpenter; Kenneth E Freedland; Nancy Morrow-Howell; Carolyn M Baum; Peter Doré; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Rationale and study design of the MyHEART study: A young adult hypertension self-management randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Consideration of treatment fidelity to improve manual therapy research.

Authors:  Steve Karas; Laura Plankis
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

5.  A hybrid process fidelity assessment in a home-based randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mary H Wilde; Dianne Liebel; Eileen Fairbanks; Paula Wilson; Margaret Lash; Shivani Shah; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; Feng Zhang; Eileen Scheid; James M McMahon
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Psychoeducational Interventions for Problematic Anger in Chronic Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study of Treatment Enactment.

Authors:  Tessa Hart; Monica J Vaccaro; Jesse R Fann; Roland D Maiuro; Shira Neuberger; Steven Sinfield
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Strategies used and data obtained during treatment fidelity monitoring.

Authors:  Janet S Carpenter; Debra S Burns; Jingwei Wu; Menggang Yu; Kristin Ryker; Eileen Tallman; Diane Von Ah
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Randomized controlled trial of the COPE-P intervention to improve mental health, healthy lifestyle behaviors, birth and post-natal outcomes of minority pregnant women: Study protocol with implications.

Authors:  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Susan Gennaro; Laura A Szalacha; Jacqueline Hoying; Caitlin O'Connor; Andrea Cooper; Anne Gibeau
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  Claire S Leathem; Margaret E Cupples; Mary C Byrne; Mary O'Malley; Ailish Houlihan; Andrew W Murphy; Susan M Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams.

Authors:  Annie McCluskey; Sandy Middleton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.