Literature DB >> 27503325

Wireless Participant Incentives Using Reloadable Bank Cards to Increase Clinical Trial Retention With Abused Women Drinkers: A Natural Experiment.

Melissa Rodgers1,2, Zachary Meisel1, Douglas Wiebe1, Paul Crits-Christoph1, Karin V Rhodes3.   

Abstract

Retaining participants in longitudinal studies is a unique methodological challenge in many areas of investigation, and specifically for researchers aiming to identify effective interventions for women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). Individuals in abusive relationships are often transient and have logistical, confidentiality, and safety concerns that limit future contact. A natural experiment occurred during a large randomized clinical trial enrolling women in abusive relationships who were also heavy drinkers, which allowed for the comparison of two incentive methods to promote longitudinal retention: cash payment versus reloadable wireless bank cards. In all, 600 patients were enrolled in the overall trial, which aimed to incentivize participants using a reloadable bank card system to promote the completion of 11 weekly interactive voice response system (IVRS) phone surveys and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up phone or in person interviews. The first 145 participants were paid with cash as a result of logistical delays in setting up the bank card system. At 12 weeks, participants receiving the bank card incentive completed significantly more IVRS phone surveys, odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.01, 1.69]. There were no significant differences between the two groups related to satisfaction or safety and/or privacy. The bank card system delivered lower administrative burden for tracking payments for study staff. Based on these and other results, our large medical research university is implementing reloadable bank card as the preferred method of participant incentive payments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anything related to domestic violence/domestic violence; clinical trials; domestic violence/alcohol and drugs; drinking behaviors; intervention/treatment and domestic violence; intimate partner violence; participant incentives; retention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503325      PMCID: PMC5589513          DOI: 10.1177/0886260516662849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  32 in total

1.  Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.

Authors:  J B VanGeest; M K Wynia; D S Cummins; I B Wilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Money for research participation: does in jeopardize informed consent?

Authors:  C Grady
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  Michele Morin Doody; Alice S Sigurdson; Diane Kampa; Kathleen Chimes; Bruce H Alexander; Elaine Ron; Robert E Tarone; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes.

Authors:  Cris M Sullivan; Debra Cain
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2004-05

Review 5.  Intimate partner violence research in the health care setting: what are appropriate and feasible methodological standards?

Authors:  Therese Zink; Frank Putnam
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2005-04

6.  Improving informed consent and enhancing recruitment for research by understanding economic behavior.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Nora E Gordon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality.

Authors:  Murray A Straus; Emily M Douglas
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2004-10

8.  Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Neal Dickert; Tom Jawetz; Gary Gensler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: getting answers to sensitive questions.

Authors:  Ross Corkrey; Lynne Parkinson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06

2.  Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Katie Gillies; Heidi Gardner; Cynthia Fraser; Timothy Ishaku; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.