| Literature DB >> 23222253 |
Shinji Otani1, Kazunari Onishi, Haosheng Mu, Yae Yokoyama, Takenobu Hosoda, Mikizo Okamoto, Youichi Kurozawa.
Abstract
Asian dust events result from displacement of atmospheric pollutants from the Chinese and Mongolian deserts, causing associated health issues throughout Northeast Asia. We investigated the relationship between skin symptoms in Asian dust events and contact allergy to Asian dust and associated metals. Increases in atmospheric levels of heavy metals such as Ni, Al, and Fe occurred during the severe Asian dust event on March 21, 2010. We conducted a case-control study (n = 62) with patch testing to compare skin symptoms on an Asian dust day with metal allergic reactions. Skin symptoms were observed in 18/62 subjects. Nine subjects with skin symptoms (group A) and 11 without (group B) were patch tested for six metals and Asian dust particles. Metal and dust samples were applied to the subjects' backs for 2 days and the reactions were scored according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group guidelines. Differences in the positive rates between the groups were analyzed. Skin reactions to ferric chloride (p = 0.015), aluminum chloride (p = 0.047), nickel sulfate (p = 0.008), and Asian dust particles (p = 0.047) were more common in group A than in group B. Skin symptoms during Asian dust events may be allergic reactions to Asian dust particle-bound metals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23222253 PMCID: PMC3546778 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9124606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Scheme of case-control study.
Figure 2Time series of hourly SPM levels from the 20th to 21st of March 2010.
Levels of 10 atmospheric heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Mn, Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, Fe, Ca, and Al) during the 3 days starting before and ending after the Asian dust day on March 21, 2010 (above), and levels of the atmospheric 10 metals in the corrected total suspended particulates (below).
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 20 | 26.2 | 6.0 | 39.4 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 10.0 | 74.6 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| March 21 | 57.2 | 46.0 | 584.9 | 1.9 | 33.3 | 36.2 | 199.5 | 15.2 | 13.6 | 9.3 |
| March 22 | 10.8 | 2.3 | 14.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 29.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 19 to 23 | 102 | 96 | 960 | 3 | 51 | 62 | 505 | 38 | 34 | 63 |
The results of the patch tests andthe percentages of each reaction. Chi-square test (*Fisher’s exact test) with a significance level of 5%. Compared with group B, significantly more subjects in group A reacted to three metal sample preparations (Fe, Al, and Ni) and the Asian dust sample preparation (labeled as D on the y-axis).
| Sample | Group | +++ | ++ | + | ± | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn * | A | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (11%) | 1 (11%) | 7 (78%) | 0.189 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | ||
| Mn * | A | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 1.000 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9%) | 10 (91%) | ||
| Cr | A | 0 (0%) | 1 (11%) | 2 (22%) | 1 (11%) | 5 (55%) | 0.279 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (91%) | ||
| Fe | A | 0 (0%) | 2 (22%) | 3 (33%) | 1 (11%) | 3 (33%) | 0.015 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | ||
| Al | A | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (33%) | 1 (11%) | 5 (55%) | 0.047 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | ||
| Ni | A | 2 (22%) | 2 (22%) | 1 (11%) | 3 (33%) | 1 (11%) | 0.008 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (18%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (82%) | ||
| D | A | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (22%) | 2 (22%) | 5 (55%) | 0.047 |
| B | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) |
Figure 3Photograph of the back of a subject in group A who positively reacted to the Cr (+), Fe (+), Al (+), Ni (+++), and Asian dust sample preparations (+) from the patch test.