Literature DB >> 32589456

Health Effects of Asian Dust: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Masahiro Hashizume1,2,3, Yoonhee Kim4, Chris Fook Sheng Ng2, Yeonseung Chung5, Lina Madaniyazi2,3, Michelle L Bell6, Yue Leon Guo7, Haidong Kan8, Yasushi Honda9, Seung-Muk Yi10, Ho Kim10, Yuji Nishiwaki11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Potential adverse health effects of Asian dust exposure have been reported, but systematic reviews and quantitative syntheses are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: We reviewed epidemiologic studies that assessed the risk of mortality, hospital admissions, and symptoms/dysfunction associated with exposure to Asian dust.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science to identify studies that reported the association between Asian dust exposure and human health outcomes. We conducted separate meta-analyses using a random-effects model for mortality and hospital admissions for a specific health outcome and assessed pooled estimates for each lag when at least three studies were available for a specific lag.
RESULTS: We identified 89 studies that met our inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates (percentage changes) of mortality from circulatory and respiratory causes for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days were 2.33% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76, 3.93] increase at lag 0 and 3.99% (95% CI: 0.08, 8.06) increase at lag 3, respectively. The increased risk for hospital admissions for respiratory disease, asthma, and pneumonia peaked at lag 3 by 8.85% (95% CI: 0.80, 17.55), 14.55% (95% CI: 6.74, 22.94), and 8.51% (95% CI: 2.89, 14.44), respectively. Seven of 12 studies reported reduced peak expiratory flow, and 16 of 21 studies reported increased respiratory symptoms associated with Asian dust exposure. There were substantial variations between the studies in definitions of Asian dust, study designs, model specifications, and confounder controls. DISCUSSION: We found evidence of increased mortality and hospital admissions for circulatory and respiratory events. However, the number of studies included in the meta-analysis was not large and further evidences are merited to strengthen our conclusions. Standardized protocols for epidemiological studies would facilitate interstudy comparisons. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5312.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32589456      PMCID: PMC7319773          DOI: 10.1289/EHP5312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


Introduction

Asian dust is a seasonal meteorological phenomenon caused by dust storms that originate in the deserts of Mongolia and northern China and are carried eastward along mid-latitude westerlies to pass over China, Korea, and Japan. The dust travels thousands of kilometers and absorbs airborne pollutants from anthropogenic sources in industrial areas (Mori et al. 2003; Takemura et al. 2002). The coarse particles of desert dust are considered potentially toxic, and their constituents vary during long-range transport (Mori et al. 2003). Some studies have suggested that the health effects of Asian dust may vary by particle composition (Hiyoshi et al. 2005; Honda et al. 2014). Concerns have also been raised that the microorganisms in the dust may cause allergic reactions based on murine and in vitro studies and that dust events may increase the incidence of respiratory microbial-derived inflammation (Honda et al. 2017; Ichinose et al. 2006, 2008a). The adverse effects induced by dust have been reported in Southern Europe, which is affected by Saharan dust (Perez et al. 2008; Stafoggia et al. 2016; Zauli Sajani et al. 2011). Multiple studies have reported the effect modification of dust events on the relationship between particulate matter (PM) exposure and mortality; the association of PM with mortality was stronger on dust days than on non-dust days (Jiménez et al. 2010; Mallone et al. 2011; Perez et al. 2008, 2012; Tobías et al. 2011). Other studies (Samoli et al. 2011a; Zauli Sajani et al. 2011) reported that dust events were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas the association of PM and mortality was similar on dust and non-dust days (Zauli Sajani et al. 2011) or was seen only on non-dust days (Samoli et al. 2011a). These discrepancies have also been reported in other studies of Southern European regions (Alessandrini et al. 2013; Middleton et al. 2008; Reyes et al. 2014; Samoli et al. 2011b). A study comparing the associations of desert- and non-desert–sourced in aerodynamic diameter () with mortality and hospital admissions reported that the health effects of desert-derived were of similar magnitude as those of non-desert sources (Stafoggia et al. 2016). The inconsistent findings in the Southern European studies were suggested to be due to different source areas and transport patterns of dust over the western and eastern sides of the Mediterranean (Stafoggia et al. 2016). Epidemiological studies on the association between desert dust exposures and health outcomes have increased over the last decades. Previous review studies have reported the increased risk of respiratory and circulatory mortality after the dust exposures, but the findings are inconsistent across the studies and quantitative syntheses are lacking (de Longueville et al. 2013; Hashizume et al. 2010; Karanasiou et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2016). We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on the health effects of exposure to Asian dust. To the best of knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the health effects of desert dust to perform a meta-analysis of suitable published studies.

Methods

Search Strategy

This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to report the results (Moher et al. 2009). We performed a systematic search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases (1980 to August 2019) to identify studies that reported the association between exposure to Asian dust and human health outcomes. The search strategy included the following combinations of keywords: ((“asian dust” or “asian sand” or “Asian Desert Dust” or “Yellow Dust” or “Yellow Sand” or “Dust events” or “Desert dust” or “Dust storm”) or ((“sand dust” OR “dust event”) and (Taiwan OR Mongolia OR Korea OR Japan OR Macau OR “Hong Kong” OR China OR “Far East”))) and ((“Adverse effect” or Allergy or “Ambulatory Care” or Ambulatory or Asthma or Cardiac or Cardiopulmonary or Cardiovascular or Death or “Emergency Medical Services” or Epidemiology or “Health Risk” or Health or “Hospital admission” or Hospital or Hospitalization or “Human Experimentation” or Irritants or Morbidity or Mortality or Pulmonary or Respiratory or Symptom or “Air Pollutant” or “Air Pollutants” or “Air Pollution” or “Air Pollutions” or “Adverse effects” or Cardio or “Hospital admissions” or Pneumonia or Stroke or Symptoms)). The literature search was restricted to articles published in English. The reference lists in the selected articles were searched manually.

Study Eligibility Criteria

We included epidemiological studies that examined the association between exposure to Asian dust and health outcomes. A Populations of interest, Exposures, Comparators, and Outcomes (PECO) statement (Morgan et al. 2018) was developed to identify epidemiological studies relevant to health effects of exposure to Asian dust. The population of interest was populations without any restrictions. Laboratory studies and animal experiments were excluded. Relevant exposures were Asian dust without any restrictions of the definition, measurement methods, length, or timing. Studies that examined the effects of PM were only included if PM was used in defining the Asian dust. Studies that reported other dust events (e.g., Saharan dust, local dust) were excluded. Comparators were nonexposed or lower-exposure individuals or the same individuals at different time points. Outcomes included mortality, hospital admissions or visits, ambulance transport, emergency room attendance, and clinician diagnoses (recorded or self-reported), symptoms, and dysfunction for any health outcomes. Studies with awareness or perception as the outcome were excluded. Conference abstracts, letters, and editorials were excluded.

Study Selection

Titles and abstracts of all papers identified by the electronic searches were screened by two independent reviewers (authors M.H. and Y.N.). The full text of articles that met the selection criteria was then assessed for inclusion eligibility in the systematic review. Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the two reviewers.

Data Extraction

We extracted information from studies that met the inclusion criteria using a standardized checklist. We collected data on study period, location, age group, health outcome, study design, exposure (Asian dust) definition, number of dust-event days, concentrations of , in aerodynamic diameter (), or other PM indicators such as suspended particulate matter (SPM) or in aerodynamic diameter () on event and non-event days, effect estimates and lag period, and confounders controlled in the model. Authors were contacted for information missing from the published reports. The health outcomes were divided into mortality, hospital admissions/visits, and symptoms/dysfunction.

Study Quality Assessment

We used the National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies meeting inclusion criteria. For mortality and hospital admission studies, we adapted the NIH framework in the absence of a validated quality assessment tool for time-series and case-crossover designs, which were commonly used in such studies. Specifically, we modified the selected questions related to exposure assessment [Questions (Q) 6 and 10], outcome assessment (Q11) and confounding control (Q14) for this purpose (see Table S1). For exposure assessment, we examined whether the lagged associations were examined (Q6), whether the study examined different levels of the exposure (Q8), whether the Asian dust event was clearly defined (Q9), and whether the multiple lagged associations were examined (Q10). For outcome assessment, we examined whether mortality or morbidity data were based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) (Q11). For confounding control, we assessed whether major potential confounders such as long-term trends, seasonality, and temperature were accounted for in assessing the exposure–outcome associations (Q14). We assigned a good, fair, or poor quality rating, following the NIH framework. The quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers (M.H. and Y.K.) and the results were reconciled until a consensus was reached.

Meta-Analysis

Before pooling the estimates, we standardized the extracted data by converting the various forms of reported estimates to a log relative risk (Asian dust days vs. non-dust days) and the corresponding standard error. If a 95% confidence interval (CI) was only available as variance estimates from the studies, we first converted the upper and lower limits to the absolute difference measures (i.e., taking the natural logarithm for relative measures) and divided the difference between upper and lower limits by 3.92 to obtain the standard error (Higgins and Green 2011). We used a random-effects model with a DerSimonian-Laird estimator to pool the estimates. We quantified the extent of heterogeneity with the statistic, representing the proportion of total variance in pooled estimates attributable to heterogeneity in the true effects. The Q statistic was used to address whether the heterogeneity was statistically significant ().

Pooling estimates by specific health outcomes, lag, and subgroups.

We performed meta-analysis for mortality and hospital admissions when at least three studies were available in order to ensure reliability of the pooled estimate (Borenstein et al. 2009) on a specific health outcome sharing ICD codes for a specific lag. Accordingly, mortality studies were further divided into three outcome categories (all-cause, circulatory, and respiratory deaths) and hospital admissions studies were into four categories (respiratory disease, asthma, pneumonia, and ischemic heart disease/acute myocardial infarction). Stratified analysis was performed by sex and age groups (nonelderly and elderly) for a specific health outcome when at least three estimates were available from different populations for a specific lag. The age cutoff of elderly was , as defined in the original study (see Excel Table S2). Meta-analysis was not performed for the symptoms or dysfunction studies because the study design, study subject, and statistical analysis methods varied considerably.

Selecting a representative from multiple effect estimates.

Some studies provided multiple effect estimates for the same health outcome by using different definitions of Asian dust, multiple models, or multiple study sites. If multiple definitions of Asian dust had been used in a given study, we included the estimates for one of the definitions that were most commonly used in other studies in the same city or country. If Asian dust had been classified according to its levels (e.g., moderate, heavy), we included the estimates for the higher level. Meta-analysis was not performed for estimates based on continuous exposure measures [i.e., nonspherical extinction coefficient of the light detection and ranging (LIDAR) method] because it was impossible to convert the continuous dust measure into a binary dust-day indicator based only on the information provided in the original studies. In addition, if multiple models (e.g., different sets of confounders) had been used in a study, we included the estimates from the main model as presented by the original authors. For multicity studies providing city-specific results, we included the estimates from each city separately if the cities were from different countries, but used pooled estimates reported if from the same country. The estimates and 95% CIs included in the meta-analysis for mortality and hospital admissions are shown in Excel Tables S1–S7.

Sensitivity analyses.

We repeated the meta-analysis for studies using only time-series or case-crossover study designs by excluding studies with other study designs. We also repeated analysis for hospital admissions by including five additional studies of which the outcome was hospital visits, emergency room visits, or ambulance transport. Moreover, we examined the robustness of pooled estimates by excluding some studies with largely overlapping periods in the same study location one by one (i.e., the leave-one-out approach). We planned to address for publication bias by using funnel plots and Begg’s test if more than 10 studies were available, but we did not assess publication bias because of the small number of studies available on each outcome. All analyses were performed using R (version 3.5.1; R Development Core Team) and the metafor package.

Results

The searches of PubMed () and Web of Science () databases produced a total of 1,715 references (Figure 1). An additional article was identified through a manual search of the reference lists of the included articles and 179 duplicates were removed, leaving 1,537 references, of which 1,381 were excluded after reviewing the title or abstract. One hundred fifty-six studies underwent in-depth evaluation, of which 89 met the criteria for qualitative synthesis. Eleven of the studies measured mortality, 45 measured hospital admissions/visits, and 33 measured symptoms/dysfunction. Study characteristics are presented in Tables 1–3. The earliest study was published in 2002 (see Figure S1). For the meta-analysis, we did not consider all of the studies included in the qualitative review for the following reasons [33 described symptoms/dysfunctions, 15 had outcomes with fewer than three estimates, 9 estimated no quantitative risk specifically for Asian dust exposure, 7 described hospital visits/ambulance transport, 4 used continuous exposure variables rather than binary (Asian dust days vs non-dust days)], leaving 21 studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1.

The literature search and screening results for studies reporting on the associations between Asian dust exposures and human health outcomes displayed as a PRISMA flow diagram (http://www.prisma-statement.org). Note: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RR, relative risk.

Table 1

Summary of characteristics of mortality studies.

StudyPeriod (y)LocationAgeOutcomeStudy designExposure definitionaDays of eventDaily mean PM10 (μg/m3)Multi-lagsConfounder controlQuality ratingb
Event daysNon-event daysSeasoncTrenddDOWTempHumPMSO2O3NO2CO
Kwon et al. 20021995–1998Seoul (Korea)AllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseTime-seriesNot specified28101.173.3YYYYYYNNNNNF
Chen et al. 20041995–2000Taipei (Taiwan)AllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseAd hoc approacheParticular enhancements in PM10 at a background monitoring station39125.957.8YYYYNNNNNNNF
Chan and Ng 20111994–2001Taipei (Taiwan)AllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseCase-crossoverTaiwan EPA38085.744.4 (PM2.5)49.631.1 (PM2.5)YYYYYNYYYNNG
Kashima et al. 20122005–201047 cities (Japan)Elderly (65y old)All cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseTime-seriesDust exposure was modeled as a continuous variable using dust extinction coefficient by LIDAR4244.3 (SPM)24.8 (SPM)YYYYYYYNNYNG
Kim et al. 20122003–2006Seoul (Korea)AllAll cause and circulatory diseaseTime-seriesKMA2140.1 (PM2.5)41.1 (PM2.5)YYYYYYYYYYYG
Lee et al. 20132001–2009Seven cities (Korea)AllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseTime-seriesKMA68109140.0176.452.565.8YYYYYYYYNYNG
Lee et al. 20142001–2009Seoul (Korea), Taipei (Taiwan), Kitakyushu (Japan)AllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseTime-seriesKMA, JMA, Taiwan EPA107 (Seoul)125 (Taipei)38 (Kitakyushu)176.4 (Seoul)71.4 (Taipei)60.5 (Kitakyushu)65.8 (Seoul)52.8 (Taipei)30.8 (Kitakyushu)YYYYYYYYNYNG
Wang and Lin 20152000–2008Taipei (Taiwan)All and Elderly (65y old)All cause and circulatory diseaseTime-seriesTaiwan EPA13282.748.7 (all days)YYYYYYYYYYNG
Kashima et al. 20162005–2011Seoul (Korea), Nagasaki, Matsue, Osaka, Tokyo (Japan)Elderly (65y old)All cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseTime-seriesDust exposure was modeled as a continuous variable using dust extinction coefficient by LIDARNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedYYYYYYYNNYNG
Wong et al. 20172009–2010Hong KongAllAll causeTime-stratified spatial regressionNot specified8Not specifiedNot specifiedNYYYYNNNNNNF
Ho et al. 20182006–2010Hong KongAllAll cause, circulatory, and respiratory diseaseCase-crossoverNASA Aerosol Robotic Network’s sunphotometer size distribution inversion data, the backward trajectories model of hybrid single-particle Lagrangian integrated trajectory, and meteorological reports1033.3 (PM2.5)44.5 (PM102.5)33.6 (PM2.5)18.0 (PM102.5)YYYYYYYYYYNF

Note: CO, carbon monoxide; DOW, day of week; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; F, fair; G, good; Hum, humidity; JMA, Japan Meteorological Administration; KMA, Korea Meteorological Administration; LIDAR, light detection and ranging; N, no; , nitrogen dioxide/; , ozone/; P, poor; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; SPM, suspended particulate matter; , sulfur dioxide; Temp, temperature; Trend, time trend; Y, yes.

Taiwan EPA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, 2. Hourly at either two background monitoring stations, and 3. Averaged hourly at three randomly selected stations among 16 stations in the Taipei metropolitan area. KMA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. visual observation. JMA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. visibility .

We used the adapted National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework.

If the referent selection was within 30 d of the event days, we regarded that the effects of season was controlled.

If the referent selection was bidirectional or time-stratified, we regarded that the effects of time trend was controlled (Janes et al. 2005).

Ad hoc approach: Comparison of the number of patients between event days and non-event days (7 d before and after each event day).

Table 2

Summary of characteristics of hospitalization studies.

StudyPeriod (y)LocationAgeOutcomeSourceStudy designExposure definitionaDays of eventDaily mean PM10 (μg/m3)Multi-lagsConfounder controlQuality ratingb
Event daysNon-event daysSeasoncTrenddDOWTempHumPMSO2O3NO2CO
Yang et al. 2005a1996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesStrokeHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Yang et al. 2005b1996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesAsthmaHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Chen and Yang 20051996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesCardiovascular diseasesHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Yang 20061997–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesConjunctivitisHospital visitAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station49110.461.7YYYYYYYNYNNF
Bennett et al. 20061997–1999Vancouver (Canada)All agesCardiac, respiratory diseasesHospital admissionComparison of the number of patients between event days in 1998 and non-event days in the same period in 1997Gobi dust event in late April 19984119–123 (hourly peak)Not specifiedNNNNNNNNNNNP
Chang et al. 20061997–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesAllergic rhinitisHospital visitAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station49110.461.7YYYYYYYNYNNF
Meng and Lu 20071994–2003Minqin (China)All agesCardiovascular, respiratory diseasesHospital admissionTime-seriesChina Meteorological Administration413Not specifiedNot specifiedYYYYYYNNNNNF
Lai and Cheng 20082000–2004Taipei (Taiwan)All agesRespiratory diseasesHospital admissionAd hoc approacheTaiwan EPA9719.8–33.9Not specifiedNYYYNNNNNNNF
Cheng et al. 20081996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesPneumoniaHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Chiu et al. 20081996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesCOPDHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Chan et al. 20081995–2002Taipei (Taiwan)All agesIschemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, COPDEmergency hospital visitComparison of the difference between model-predicted patients (without Asian dust effects) and observed patients on Asian dust daysTaiwan EPAHigh-dust days: PM10>90μg/m3Low-dust days: PM10>90μg/m385 (39 high-dust days and 46 low-dust days)112.7 (high-dust days)61.1 (low-dust days)Not specifiedNYYYYNYNNYNF
Bell et al. 20081995–2002Taipei (Taiwan)All agesAsthma, pneumonia, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular diseaseHospital admissionTime-series(a) PM10 levels>115μg/m3 in Taipei and (b) >100μg/m3 at the background monitoring station2.1% of days for (a), 1.6% of days for (b)49.1 (annual mean)31.6 (PM2.5, annual mean)Not specifiedYYYYYfNNNNNNG
Yang et al. 20091996–2001Taipei (Taiwan)All agesCongestive heart failureHospital admissionAd hoc approacheHourly PM10>125μg/m3 lasting for at least 3 h at the background monitoring station54111.755.4YYYYYYYNYNNF
Kanatani et al. 2010February–April 2005–2009Toyama (Japan)Children (1–15 y old)AsthmaHospital admissionCase-crossoverDaily average dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR method less than 1km from the ground (=0.1mg/m3)666.3 (SPM)16.9 (SPM)YYYYYYYgYYYNG
Ueda et al. 20102001–2007Fukuoka (Japan)Children (12y old)AsthmaEmergency hospital admissionCase-crossoverJMA10662.8 (SPM)34.3 (SPM)NYYYYYNNNNNF
Ueda et al. 2012March–May2003–2007Nagasaki (Japan)All agesCirculatory, respiratory diseaseAmbulance transportCase-crossoverDaily average dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR method at 120900m from the ground but >0.105/km (for heavy Asian dust) and 0.066–0.105/km (for moderate Asian dust)17 (heavy Asian dust) 31 (moderate Asian dust)57.7 (SPM, heavy dust days)44.4 (SPM, moderate dust days)30.3 (SPM)YYYYYYYgNNNNG
Kamouchi et al. 20121999–2010Fukuoka (Japan)Adults (20y old)Ischemic strokeHospital admissionCase-crossoverJMA13759.6 (SPM)29.5 (SPM)YYYYYYYYYYNG
Yu et al. 20121997–2007Taipei (Taiwan)Children (14y old)Respiratory diseasesHospital visitSpatiotemporal modelingCCU database (1997–2000) Taiwan EPA (2001–2007)17290.652.7YYYYYNNNNNNG
Kang et al. 20122000–2009Taipei (Taiwan)All agesPneumoniaHospital admissionTime-seriesTotal particulate matter>100μg/m3 at three background monitoring stations135121.749.2YNYNYNNYYNYF
Tam et al. 2012a1998–2002Hong Kong (China)Not specifiedCirculatory diseasesHospital admissionCase-crossoverAir pollution index>100μg/m3PM2.5:PM10<0.4• Predominant easterly wind profile• At least three times higher concentrations of dust storm tracer elements than annual averages5134.359.9 (PM2.5)49.935.2 (PM2.5)YYYYYYYYYYNF
Tam et al. 2012b1998–2002Hong Kong (China)Not specifiedRespiratory diseasesHospital admissionCase-crossoverAir pollution index>100μg/m3PM2.5:PM10<0.4• Predominant easterly wind profile• At least three times higher concentrations of dust storm tracer elements than annual averages5134.359.9 (PM2.5)49.935.2 (PM2.5)YYYYYYYYYYNF
Chien et al. 20121997–2007Taipei (Taiwan)Children (14y old)Respiratory diseasesHospital visitSpatiotemporal modelingCCU database (1997–2000)Taiwan EPA (2001–2007)172Not specifiedNot specifiedYNYYYNYNNNNG
Tao et al. 2012March–May2001–2005Lanzhou(China)Not specifiedRespiratory diseasesHospital admissionTime-seriesMeteorological Bureau of Gansu Province49536.1190.6YYYYYYYYNYNF
Yu et al. 20131998–2007Taipei (Taiwan)Children (14y old)Respiratory diseasesHospital visitsSpatiotemporal modelingTaiwan EPA16475.951.4NNYYYNYYYYNF
Kang et al. 20132000–2009Taipei (Taiwan)All agesStrokeHospital admissionTime-seriesTotal particulate matter>100μg/m3 at three background monitoring stations135121.749.2YYYNYNNYNNYF
Kashima et al. 20142006–2010Okayama (Japan)Elderly (65y old)All causes, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonary diseasesAmbulance transportTime-seriesAsian dust was modeled as a continuous variable using the dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR methodNot specified43.8 (SPM, moderate dust days)67.3 (SPM, severe dust days)25.3 (SPM)YYYYYYYNNNNG
Chien et al. 20142002–2007Taipei (Taiwan)Children (14y old)ConjunctivitisHospital visitSpatiotemporal modelingTaiwan EPA9081.153.3NNYYYNYYYYNF
Wang et al. 20142000–2009TaiwanAll agesAsthmaHospital admissionTime-seriesTaiwan EPANot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedYYYNYNNYYNYF
Matsukawa et al. 20142003–2010Fukuoka (Japan)Adults (20y old)Acute myocardial infarctionHospital admissionCase-crossoverJMA7558.129.7YYYYYYYYYYNG
Nakamura et al. 20152005–2008Seven prefectures (Japan)All agesOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestUtstein-style dataCase-crossover1. Daily maximum dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR method >0.05/km2. Daily maximum SPM >50μg/m33. Correlation coefficient between hourly Asian dust extinction coefficient and hourly SPM >0.6average 28 (minimum 7, maximum 79)Not specifiedNot specifiedYYYYYYYgYYYNG
Teng et al. 20162000–2009TaiwanAll agesAcute myocardial infarctionHospital admissionTime-seriesTaiwan EPA46 eventsNot specifiedNot specifiedYYYNYNNNNYYF
Lin et al. 20162000–2008Taipei (Taiwan)All agesAll causes, circulatory, respiratory diseasesEmergency room visitTime-seriesTaiwan EPA132Not specifiedNot specifiedYYYYYYYNYYNG
Wang et al. 20162005–2012Minqin (China)All agesPulmonary tuberculosisHospital visit1. Seasonal periodicity analysis2. Linear regression with three atmospheric variables (visibility, duration, and wind speed)China Meteorological AdministrationNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNNNNNNNNNNNP
Y-S Park et al. 20162007–2013Seoul and Incheon (Korea)All agesAsthmaHospital visitCase-crossoverKMA7448.6 (daily maximum)163.1 (daily maximum)YYYYYYYYYYYF
Nakamura et al. 20162010–2013Nagasaki (Japan)Children (15y old)Asthma, respiratory diseaseEmergency room visitCase-crossover1. Daily maximum dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR method >0.05/km2. Daily maximum SPM >50μg/m33. Correlation coefficient between hourly Asian dust extinction coefficient and hourly SPM >0.64753.1 (SPM)24.0 (SPM)YYYYYYYgYYYNG
Ma et al. 20162007–2011Lanzhou (China)All agesRespiratory diseasesEmergency room visitTime-series, effect modification of PM10, SO2, and NO2 by Asian dustVisibility <1,000m32324146YYYYYYYYNYNF
Altindag et al. 20172003–2011All cities (Korea)BirthBirth weight, low birth weight, gestation, premature birth, fetal growthBirth certificateLinear regression modelKMANot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNYYNYYYNNNNF
Kojima et al. 20172010–2015Kumamoto (Japan)All agesAcute myocardial infarctionHospital admission/visitCase-crossoverJMA4134.9 (PM2.5)20.5 (PM2.5)NYYYYYYYYYNG
Sakata et al. 20171989–2012Fukuoka (Japan)All agesPollinosisHospital visitTime-seriesJMA23858.9 (SPM)29.4 (SPM)YYYYYYYNNNNG
Liu et al. 20172006–2008Central TaiwanAll agesAll causes, circulatory, respiratory diseasesEmergency room visitCase-crossover, effect of PM2.5 during Asian dustTaiwan EPA16133.061.9 (PM2.5)77.848.9 (PM2.5)YYYYYYYYYYYF
Kashima et al. 20172006–2010Okayama (Japan)Elderly (65y old)Circulatory, respiratory diseasesEmergency room visitCase-crossoverAsian dust was modeled as a continuous variable using the dust extinction coefficient by the LIDAR method26185.6 (converted from nonspherical extinction coefficient)Not specifiedYYYYYYYNNNNG
Ma et al. 2017a2007–2011Lanzhou (China)All agesAll causes, circulatory diseasesHospital admissionTime-series, effect modification of PM10, SO2, and NO2 by Asian dustHorizontal visibility <1,000m32324146YYYYYYYYYYNF
Ma et al. 2017b1965–2005Gansu (China)All agesMeaslesNot specifiedCorrelation, time-seriesMeteorological Bureau of Gansu ProvinceNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNYYNNNNNNNNP
Chan et al. 20182000–2009TaiwanAll agesDiabetesHospital admissionTime-seriesTaiwan EPA55Not specifiedNot specifiedYYYNYNNNYYYF
Wang et al. 2018March 2016Inner Mongolia (China)All agesCardiovascular, respiratory diseasesHospital visitCorrelationNot specified4Not specifiedNot specifiedNNNNNNNNNNNF

Note: CO, carbon monoxide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DOW, day of week; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; F, fair; G, good; Hum, humidity; JMA, Japan Meteorological Administration; KMA, Korea Meteorological Administration; LIDAR, light detection and ranging; N, no; , nitrogen dioxide/; , ozone/; P, poor; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; SPM, suspended particulate matter;, sulfur dioxide; Temp, temperature; Trend, time trend; Y, yes.

Taiwan EPA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, 2. Hourly at either of two background monitoring stations, and 3. Averaged hourly at three randomly selected stations of 16 in the Taipei metropolitan area. Chinese Culture University database: 1. Visibility less than for 24 h in any of three neighboring First GARP Global Experiment-type ground stations in East Asia, and 2. concentrations observed by at least one of the air quality monitoring stations located in Wanli, Guanyin, Danshui, and Yilan. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration): 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. Visual observation. JMA (Japan Meteorological Administration): 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. Visibility . China Meteorological Administration: Unknown definition of Asian dust.

We used the adapted National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework.

If the referent selection was within 30 d of the event days, we regarded the effects of season as controlled.

If the referent selection was bidirectional or time-stratified, we regarded the effects of time trend as controlled (Janes et al. 2005).

Ad hoc approach: Comparison of the number of patients between event days and non-event days (7 d before and after of each event day).

Extinction coefficients for spherical particles.

Apparent temperature.

Table 3

Summary of characteristics of symptom and dysfunction studies.

StudyPeriod (y)LocationSubjectOutcomeStudy design/statistical analysisExposure definitionDays of eventDaily mean PM10 (μg/m3)Summary resultsConfounder controlQuality ratinga
Event daysNon-event days
Park et al. 2005March–June 2002Incheon (Korea)64 asthmatic adults (16–75 y old)Changes in PEF, respiratory symptomsPEF, respiratory symptoms, and daily activities were recorded twice daily. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the relationship between respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and air pollution levels.Reduced visibility and meteorological experts’ judgment14188.560.0An increase in PM10 concentrations was associated with increases in PEF variability of >20%, more nighttime symptoms, and a decrease in the mean PEF.Time trendP
Yoo et al. 2008March–May 2004Seoul (Korea)52 asthmatic childrenChanges in PEF, respiratory symptomsRespiratory symptoms and PEF were recorded twice daily; participants underwent methacholine bronchial challenge tests. Average levels of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function parameters on the Asian dust days and the following 2 d were compared with those of the control days using the Kruskal-Wallis test.KMA5Not specifiedNot specifiedThe prevalence of acute respiratory symptoms and signs was significantly higher during Asian dust days. Reduction in morning and evening PEF and increases in PEF diurnal variability and bronchodilator response were significant during Asian dust days.Not specifiedP
Hong et al. 2010May–June 2007Seoul (Korea)110 school children (9 y old)Changes in PEFPEF was measured three times a day and daily mean PEF was used for analysis. Linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate particulates or metal effects on daily PEF.PM10>130μg/m3Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedPM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were not significantly associated with PEF except in asthmatics. Most of the metals bound to the particulates were associated with a decrease in children’s PEF.Age, sex, height, weight, asthma history, passive smoking, daily mean temperature, mean relative humidity, air pressure, time trendF
Mu et al. 2011May–2008Ulaanbaatar, Gobi Desert (Mongolia)36 urban and 87 desert area residents (all ages)Eye and respiratory symptomsThe prevalence of subjective eye and respiratory symptoms was compared between 36 urban and 87 desert area residents after a dust storm.A dust storm on 26–27 May 2008Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedThe prevalence of tearing but not respiratory symptoms were significantly higher in the desert area residents than in the urban area residents.Age, sex, and smokingP
Watanabe et al. 2011aFebruary–March, December 2009Yonago (Japan)145 asthmatic adults (>18y old)Changes in PEF, respiratory symptomsPEF was measured three times a day. Mean morning PEF was compared between Asian dust days and non-dust days.JMA/MOE1165.327.8There was no significant difference in mean morning PEF and respiratory symptoms between Asian dust days and non-dust days.Temperature, atmospheric pressure, pollen, PM10, SO2, NO2F
Watanabe et al. 2011bApril–May 2007Yonago (Japan)98 asthmatic adults (>18y old)Changes in PEF, respiratory symptomsTelephone survey: Aggravation of respiratory symptoms (cough, sputum, dyspnea, wheezing) 3 d after the Asian dust event. Mean morning PEF was compared between Asian dust days and non-dust days.JMA/MOE10101.240.522% reported worsening lower respiratory symptoms during Asian dust events and significant reduction of the lowest PEF over a week expressed as a percentage of the highest PEF (Min%Max) during 6 d after the dust event.Not specifiedF
Otani et al. 2011February 2009Yonago (Japan)54 healthy volunteersNasopharyngeal, ocular, respiratory, and dermal symptomsSymptom scores collected by questionnaire were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days.JMA633.0 (SPM)15.6 (SPM)The total symptom score on Asian dust days was significantly higher than on non-Asian dust days. The dermal symptom scores were positively correlated with levels of SPM.Not specifiedP
Otani et al. 2012March 2010Yonago (Japan)62 healthy volunteersDermal symptoms and allergic reactions to heavy metalsAllergic reactions to heavy metals were examined by patch test and compared between 9 participants with dermal symptoms and 11 participants without dermal symptoms on Asian dust days.JMA1151 (SPM)Not specifiedReactions to iron, aluminum, and nickel were higher in participants with dermal symptoms on Asian dust days.Not specifiedP
Watanabe et al. 2012March 2007–2010Tottori (Japan)46 asthma patientsRespiratory, ocular, and dermal symptomsTelephone survey: respiratory, ocular, and dermal symptoms on the Asian dust days compared with a week prior.JMA/MOE832.0–151.0 (SPM)Not specifiedThe number of patients who reported exacerbation of symptoms varied between dust events. Only two patients consistently reported symptom exacerbation.Not specifiedP
Onishi et al. 2012February–March 2009Yonago (Japan)54 healthy volunteersNasopharyngeal, ocular, respiratory, and dermal symptomsSymptom scores recorded by questionnaire were compared between before and after Asian dust days and stratified by dust componentSYNOP report of WMO and JMA9Non-mineral dust aerosols: Type 1: 28.3–56.1; Type 2: 24.3–38.3; Type 3: 9.1Not specifiedNasal and ocular symptoms scores increased after exposure to Type 1 events. Nasal symptom scores decreased after exposure to Type 3 events.Not specifiedF
Otani et al. 20142012Tottori (Japan)25 healthy volunteersNasal, pharyngeal, ocular, respiratory, and dermal symptomsSymptom scores recorded by questionnaire were correlated with serum IgE levels measured after the Asian dust event.JMA334.3 (SPM)13.6 (SPM)There was a positive association between nasal symptom scores and two microbial-specific IgE levels.Not specifiedP
Ogi et al. 2014February–March 2009Fukui (Japan)41 patients with nasal and ocular allergy symptoms (20y old)Nasopharyngeal and ocular symptoms, medication useSymptom scores recorded by diary were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days.Visibility <10kmNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedScores for nasal and ocular symptoms increased after an Asian dust event both pre- and post-Japanese cedar pollen season.Not specifiedP
Mimura et al. 2014March 2011Tokyo (Japan)10 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients, 3 atopic keratoconjunctivitis patients, 10 healthy controlsSkin pick tests positiveSkin pick tests were performed with untreated Asian dust, Asian dust extract, heat-sterilized Asian dust, silicon dioxide, and phosphate-buffered saline.Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedPositive skin patch tests for untreated Asian dust, Asian dust extract, and heat-sterilized Asian dust were higher in the conjunctivitis groups than in the control group.Not specifiedP
Higashi et al. 2014a2011Kanazawa (Japan)86 adult asthma patientsCoughIncidence of cough symptoms recorded by diary was regressed with graded categories of Asian dust days.Five-grade categories of Asian dust days created by dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR)Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedA dose-response relationship between Asian dust concentrations and daily cough incidence was observed.Sex, age, body mass index, temperature, rain, seasonality, spherical particles (LIDAR), and PM2.5G
Higashi et al. 2014b2011Kanazawa (Japan)86 adult patients with chronic coughRespiratory, nasal, and ophthalmic allergic symptomsIncidence of symptoms recorded by diary was compared between Asian dust days and non-dust days.Four consecutive days when the dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR)>0.03/km at 1km above the ground1568.4–125.1 (TSP)17.5 (TSP)More patients experienced coughing and itchy eyes during Asian dust periods.Not specifiedF
Watanabe et al. 2014February–May 2011Tottori (Japan)231 adult asthma patientsChanges in PEF, respiratory symptomsDaily PEF and respiratory symptom scores recorded by diary were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days.JMA364.0–109.0 (SPM)17.2–28.8 (SPM)Upper and lower respiratory tract symptom scores were higher on Asian dust days. There was no significant association between daily PEF and Asian dust exposure.Not specifiedP
Onishi et al. 2015February 2009Yonago (Japan)54 healthy volunteersNasopharyngeal, ocular, respiratory, and dermal symptomsSymptom scores recorded by questionnaire were regressed with air pollutants and ambient heavy metals.JMA635.8 (SPM)16.8 (SPM)The dermal symptom score was positively associated with levels of SPM and nickel. Heavy metal levels were significantly higher on Asian dust days.Not specifiedP
Watanabe et al. 2015aMarch–May 2012Yonago (Japan)33 adult asthma patientsChanges in PEF and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)Daily records of morning PEF and FeNO were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days using linear regression.JMA2Not specifiedNot specifiedNo significant association of PEF and FeNO with Asian dust exposure.Not specifiedP
Watanabe et al. 2015b2012–2013Matsue (Japan)399 schoolchildren (8–9 y old)Changes in PEFDaily records of morning PEF were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days using linear mixed models.JMA and LIDAR method717.2–37.8 (PM2.5)10.3 in 2012 (PM2.5)17.5 in 2013 (PM2.5)PEF decreased after Asian dust exposure from Day 0 to Day 3.Age, sex, height, weight, allergy history, air pollutants (SPM, PM2.5, O3, SO2, NO2) and weather conditions (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure)F
Watanabe et al. 2015cMarch–May 2013Yonago (Japan)137 asthma patientsChanges in PEF, respiratory symptomsDaily PEF and respiratory symptom scores recorded by diary were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days using linear mixed models.Hourly dust extinction coefficient >0.1/km (LIDAR)8Not specifiedNot specifiedSymptom scores were higher on Asian dust days. There was no significant association between PEF and Asian dust exposure.Age, sex, smoking, allergy history, treatments, pulmonary function, air pollutants (O3, SO2, NO2), and weather conditions (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure)F
Aili and Oanh 2015February–May 2013Burgur (China)810 residents (all ages)Symptoms (cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, heavy chest, dry throat, dry eyes, tears, runny nose, sneezing, depressed mood)Severity of symptoms recorded by questionnaire was compared between suspended dust days, blowing dust days, sand storm days, and non-dust days.Suspended dust: visibility <10km, blowing dust: visibility 110km, sand storm: wind velocity >25m/s and visibility <1kmSuspended dust: 26; blowing dust: 8; sand storm: 31,073 (TSP, suspended dust); 1,379 (TSP, blowing dust); 2,522 (TSP, sand storm)Not specifiedAir pollutants that increased during the dust event were correlated with respiratory symptoms and ear, nose, and throat symptoms.Not specifiedP
Wang et al. 20152011Minqin (China)728 farmers (40y old)Respiratory diseases and symptomsPrevalence of respiratory symptoms measured by questionnaire was compared between randomly selected farmers living in exposed towns (near the desert) and control town.China Meteorological AdministrationNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedThe odds ratios of chronic rhinitis, chronic bronchitis, and chronic cough were 3.1, 2.5, and 1.8, respectively.Not specifiedP
Watanabe et al. 2016aApril–May 2012Shimane (Japan)399 schoolchildrenChanges in PEFThe association between daily records of morning PEF and dust extinction coefficient was analyzed using linear mixed models.Asian dust was modeled as a continuous variable using the dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR)Not specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedIncrease in sand dust particles was associated with a decrease in PEF.Sex, height, weight, allergy history, air pollutants (SPM, PM2.5, O3, SO2, NO2), and weather conditions (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure)F
Watanabe et al. 2016bMarch–May 2012Tottori (Japan)231 adult asthma patientsChanges in PEFThe association between daily records of morning PEF and Asian dust exposures was analyzed using linear mixed models.Daily average dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR) >0.032/km at a 120150-m altitude6Not specifiedNot specifiedDaily PEF was significantly lower on Asian dust days.Age, sex, smoking, allergic rhinitis, treatments, weather conditions (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure) and air pollutants (O3, SO2, NO2, spherical particles, SPM, and PM2.5)F
Watanabe et al. 2016c2012Tottori (Japan)231 adult asthma patientsChanges in PEFThe association between daily records of morning PEF and Asian dust exposures was analyzed using linear mixed models.JMA2Not specifiedNot specifiedPEF decreased after exposure to heavy Asian dust in patients with asthma and in patients with asthma and COPD.Age, sex, smoking, treatment, ACT score, and weather conditions (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure)F
Kanatani et al. 20162011, 2013Kyoto, Toyama, Tottori (Japan)3,327 pregnant womenAllergic symptoms (allergy-control score)Symptom scores were collected by questionnaire and compared between Asian dust and non-Asian dust days.Daily average dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR) >0.07/km at a 135-m altitude2734.2 (SPM); 27.6 (PM2.5)11.6 (SPM); 11.8 (PM2.5)Pregnant women had an increased risk of allergic symptoms on high desert-dust days. The increase was mostly driven by sensitivity to Japanese cedar pollen.Pollen, O3, SO2, NO2, spherical particles, air pressure, pressure change from the previous day, mean temperature, temperature change from the previous day, temperature change within the day, minimum temperature, humidityG
Ko et al. 2016March–May 2013Fukuoka (Japan)45 patients with acute conjunctivitisAcute conjunctivitisClinical symptoms were recorded and scored for patients newly diagnosed with acute conjunctivitis. The clinical scores were compared between patients with higher and lower silicon/aluminum-rich compounds (components of Asian dust).JMA2Not specifiedNot specifiedClinical conjunctivitis scores were higher in patients on Asian dust days.Not specifiedP
Majbauddin et al. 2016March 2013Yonago (Japan)42 healthy volunteers (mean age 33.6 y old)Nasal, ocular, respiratory, and skin symptomsSymptom scores collected by web-based survey application were compared between Asian dust days and non-Asian dust days.JMA452.3 (SPM)40.9 (PM2.5)19.6 (SPM)17.1 (PM2.5)Ocular, nasal, and skin symptom scores were significantly higher on Asian dust days than on non-Asian dust days.Not specifiedP
Watanabe et al. 2017February 2015Matsue (Japan)345 elementary school students (10–12 y old)Skin symptomsDaily records of skin symptoms were regressed with air pollutants and Asian dust indicator measured by LIDARDaily median dust extinction coefficient (LIDAR) at a 120150-m altitudeNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedDust extinction coefficient was not associated with skin symptoms.Sex, height, weight, asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies and meteorological variables (temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure)F
Onishi et al. 2018October–November 2011Yonago (Japan)29 healthy volunteers (mean age 39.3 y old)Nasal, ocular, respiratory and skin symptoms, fever, headacheSymptom scores recorded by diary questionnaire were regressed with air pollutants (dust, SO4, BC, OC).Dust concentrations by the numerical aerosol simulation modelsNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedA significant linear association of dust concentrations with respiratory symptoms was observed.Age, sex, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressureF
Li et al. 20182010–2012North of Qinling Mountail-Huaihe River Line (China)2,693 children (30–180 months old)Cognitive functionThe association between prenatal exposure to dust and children’s cognitive function was examined using data from a nationally representative panel study.Visibility <1km, observation of the storm at three or more neighboring meteorological stations6 d (median exposure during the entire prenatal period)Not specifiedNot specifiedPrenatal exposure to dust in the seventh gestational month was significantly associated with reduced mathematics test scores and word test scores, additional months to begin speaking in sentences and to begin counting.Children’s, parents’, and household characteristics and cooking fuelG
Nakao et al. 20182013–2015Hwaseong (Korea)75 COPD patients (40–79 y old)Respiratory symptoms and health-related quality of lifePanel study: patients with and without COPD filled out the symptom questionnaire and were followed up.Criteria by National Institute of Environmental ResearchNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedThere was no evidence for the association between dust events and respiratory symptoms.Age, sex, body mass index, smoking, COPD severity, use of air conditioner, time spent outdoorsF
Nakao et al. 20192010–2015Kumamoto/Niigata (Japan)2,287 healthy adults (40–79 y old)Respiratory symptoms and health-related quality of lifePanel study: participants filled out the symptom questionnaire and were followed up.Not specified39 (Kumamoto); 12 (Niigata)Not specifiedNot specifiedIncreased number of dust exposures was associated with cough in Kumamoto and with allergic symptoms in both areas.Years of survey, age, sex, body mass index, smoking, working statusF

Note: BC, black carbon; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; F, fair; G, good; JMA, Japan Meteorological Agency; KMA, Korea Meteorological Agency; LIDAR, Light detection and ranging; MOE, Ministry of Environment; , nitrogen dioxide; OC, organic carbon; , ozone; P, poor; PEF, peak expiratory flow; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , sulfur dioxide; , sulfate; SPM, suspended particulate matter; TSP, total suspended particulates; WMO, World Meteorological Organization.

We used the National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework.

The literature search and screening results for studies reporting on the associations between Asian dust exposures and human health outcomes displayed as a PRISMA flow diagram (http://www.prisma-statement.org). Note: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RR, relative risk. Summary of characteristics of mortality studies. Note: CO, carbon monoxide; DOW, day of week; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; F, fair; G, good; Hum, humidity; JMA, Japan Meteorological Administration; KMA, Korea Meteorological Administration; LIDAR, light detection and ranging; N, no; , nitrogen dioxide/; , ozone/; P, poor; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; SPM, suspended particulate matter; , sulfur dioxide; Temp, temperature; Trend, time trend; Y, yes. Taiwan EPA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, 2. Hourly at either two background monitoring stations, and 3. Averaged hourly at three randomly selected stations among 16 stations in the Taipei metropolitan area. KMA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. visual observation. JMA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. visibility . We used the adapted National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework. If the referent selection was within 30 d of the event days, we regarded that the effects of season was controlled. If the referent selection was bidirectional or time-stratified, we regarded that the effects of time trend was controlled (Janes et al. 2005). Ad hoc approach: Comparison of the number of patients between event days and non-event days (7 d before and after each event day). Summary of characteristics of hospitalization studies. Note: CO, carbon monoxide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DOW, day of week; EPA, Environmental Protection Agency; F, fair; G, good; Hum, humidity; JMA, Japan Meteorological Administration; KMA, Korea Meteorological Administration; LIDAR, light detection and ranging; N, no; , nitrogen dioxide/; , ozone/; P, poor; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; SPM, suspended particulate matter;, sulfur dioxide; Temp, temperature; Trend, time trend; Y, yes. Taiwan EPA: 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, 2. Hourly at either of two background monitoring stations, and 3. Averaged hourly at three randomly selected stations of 16 in the Taipei metropolitan area. Chinese Culture University database: 1. Visibility less than for 24 h in any of three neighboring First GARP Global Experiment-type ground stations in East Asia, and 2. concentrations observed by at least one of the air quality monitoring stations located in Wanli, Guanyin, Danshui, and Yilan. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration): 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. Visual observation. JMA (Japan Meteorological Administration): 1. Dust storm occurrence in China and Mongolia, and 2. Visibility . China Meteorological Administration: Unknown definition of Asian dust. We used the adapted National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework. If the referent selection was within 30 d of the event days, we regarded the effects of season as controlled. If the referent selection was bidirectional or time-stratified, we regarded the effects of time trend as controlled (Janes et al. 2005). Ad hoc approach: Comparison of the number of patients between event days and non-event days (7 d before and after of each event day). Extinction coefficients for spherical particles. Apparent temperature. Summary of characteristics of symptom and dysfunction studies. Note: BC, black carbon; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; F, fair; G, good; JMA, Japan Meteorological Agency; KMA, Korea Meteorological Agency; LIDAR, Light detection and ranging; MOE, Ministry of Environment; , nitrogen dioxide; OC, organic carbon; , ozone; P, poor; PEF, peak expiratory flow; PM, particulate matter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , in aerodynamic diameter; , sulfur dioxide; , sulfate; SPM, suspended particulate matter; TSP, total suspended particulates; WMO, World Meteorological Organization. We used the National Institute of Health (NIH) framework for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) to assess the quality of the studies (see Table S1). We assigned a good (G), fair (F), or poor (P) quality rating following the NIH framework. Study quality varied substantially between the outcome categories (Tables 1–3). Overall, we rated quality more highly in mortality studies followed by hospital admission and symptoms/dysfunction studies. Seven (63.6%) studies were rated good in mortality studies, and 14 (31.1%) and 3 (9.1%) studies were rated good in hospital admission and symptom/dysfunction studies, respectively. Sixteen (48.5%) studies were rated poor in symptom/dysfunction studies, and 3 (6.7%) and 0 studies were rated poor in hospital admission and mortality studies, respectively. The high proportion of poor quality in symptom/dysfunction studies was mainly because multiple studies in this category did not control for confounders or did not describe confounder control, did not report how information bias was controlled when the outcomes were self-reported symptoms or self-measured PEF, or were of a cross-sectional design that is prone to causal inferences between exposures and outcomes. The lower-rated quality in hospital admission studies compared with mortality studies is partly because more hospital admission studies were conducted in the early 2000s, before the standard time-series or case-crossover designs were widely used in this field.

Mortality

All 11 studies assessed all-cause mortality (Table 1). Nine studies assessed mortality from circulatory causes (Chan and Ng 2011; Chen et al. 2004; Ho et al. 2018; Kashima et al. 2012, 2016; Kim et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2013, 2014; Wang and Lin 2015), 7 assessed mortality from respiratory causes (Chan and Ng 2011; Chen et al. 2004; Ho et al. 2018; Kashima et al. 2012, 2016; Lee et al. 2013, 2014), and 1 assessed mortality from both causes combined (Kwon et al. 2002). Seven studies used a time-series design (Kashima et al. 2012, 2016; Kim et al. 2012; Kwon et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2013, 2014; Wang and Lin 2015), 2 used a case-crossover design (Chan and Ng 2011; Ho et al. 2018), and 1 compared the number of deaths between dust days and control days using Poisson regression (Chen et al. 2004). For exposure definition, five studies used a local meteorological authority’s definition of Asian dust (Chan and Ng 2011; Kim et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2013, 2014; Wang and Lin 2015), and 2 used the LIDAR as an indicator of Asian dust with the nonspherical extinction coefficient as a continuous variable (Kashima et al. 2012, 2016). Ten studies assessed multiple lag associations (Table 1). Figure 2 displays the individual and pooled estimates of the associations between Asian dust exposure at lag 0 and all-cause, circulatory, and respiratory mortality. The pooled estimate (percentage change) of circulatory mortality for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days at lag 0 was 2.33% (95% CI: 0.76, 3.93) (, , , ). There was no evidence of a pooled association between all-cause mortality and Asian dust exposure at any lag up to lag 7 (Figure 3; see also Excel Table S1). There was a 3.99% (95% CI: 0.08, 8.06) increase in the pooled estimate of mortality from respiratory causes at lag 3 (, , , ). There was little evidence of heterogeneity between the estimates for all three outcomes at all lags. The association between Asian dust and all-cause mortality did not differ between age groups (see Figure S2, Excel Table S2).
Figure 2.

Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the association of all-cause, circulatory, and respiratory mortality with Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days at lag 0. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. Diamonds represent the pooled random-effects estimates, with the width indicating the 95% CIs. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Point estimates and 95% CIs for Chen et al. 2004 and Kim et al. 2012 were recalculated by the authors based on the information in the paper. Note: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; RE, random effects.

Figure 3.

Random-effects pooled estimates (percentage changes) of mortality for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days, stratified by outcome and lag time. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval.

Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the association of all-cause, circulatory, and respiratory mortality with Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days at lag 0. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. Diamonds represent the pooled random-effects estimates, with the width indicating the 95% CIs. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Point estimates and 95% CIs for Chen et al. 2004 and Kim et al. 2012 were recalculated by the authors based on the information in the paper. Note: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; RE, random effects. Random-effects pooled estimates (percentage changes) of mortality for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days, stratified by outcome and lag time. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval. We repeated the analysis by limiting the studies to those with time-series and case-crossover designs by excluding one study (Chen et al. 2004) for all three categories of mortality outcomes. The study selection did not affect the main results and interpretation, but the pooled estimate for mortality from respiratory causes at lag 3 increased slightly to 4.22% (95% CI: 0.28, 8.32) (see Figure S3, Excel Table S3). Sensitivity analysis by excluding studies with largely overlapping periods in the same study location (the leave-one-out approach) showed that the pooled estimates were robust (see Figure S4, Excel Table S1).

Hospital Admissions

Studies examining hospital admissions/visits listed multiple diseases and conditions as the cause (Table 2). Fourteen studies used a time-series design, 13 used a case-crossover design, 11 simply compared the number of deaths between dust days and control days, 4 used spatiotemporal modeling (Chien et al. 2012, 2014; Yu et al. 2012, 2013), 2 used seasonal periodicity analysis and/or linear regression (Altindag et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2016), and 1 used correlation analysis (Wang et al. 2018). In terms of exposure definition, 20 studies used a local meteorological authority’s definition of Asian dust, and 17 studies set their own definition using PM of a certain diameter, with or without other indicators such as wind profile or LIDAR. Four studies relied solely on LIDAR as a continuous variable (Kashima et al. 2014) or with a certain threshold for the nonspherical extinction coefficient (Kanatani et al. 2010; Kashima et al. 2014; Ueda et al. 2012), 2 studies used visibility (Ma et al. 2016, 2017a), and 1 study did not report the definition (Wang et al. 2018). Most of the studies published before 2010, with the exception of two (Bell et al. 2008; Meng and Lu 2007), simply compared the number of patients between event days and non-event days (7 d before and after each event day) rather than using time-series or case-crossover analysis. Figure 4 shows the associations between Asian dust exposure at lag 3 [the lag with the most associations in the pooled analysis (Figure 5)] and hospital admissions for respiratory disease, asthma, pneumonia, and ischemic heart disease/acute myocardial infarction. The meta-analysis was not applied to other hospitalization causes because there were fewer than three estimates. The lag pattern of the meta-analysis showed evidence of a positive association for respiratory diseases (lag 3), asthma (lags 1 and 3), and pneumonia (lags 1 and 3) (Figure 5; see also Excel Table S4). The increased risk for respiratory diseases (8.85%), asthma (14.55%), and pneumonia (8.51%) peaked at lag 3. There was little evidence of an association with ischemic heart disease/acute myocardial infarction. There was little evidence of heterogeneity between the estimates for respiratory disease (lag 3) and asthma (lags 1 and 3) when there was an evidence of the pooled association (). The association between Asian dust exposure and hospital admissions for respiratory distress did not differ by sex (see Figure S5, Excel Table S5).
Figure 4.

Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the association of hospital admissions for respiratory disease, asthma, pneumonia, and ischemic heart disease/acute myocardial infarction with Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days at lag 3. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. Diamonds represent the pooled random-effects estimates, with the width indicating the 95% CIs. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; RE, random effects.

Figure 5.

Random-effects pooled estimates (percentage changes) hospital admissions for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days, stratified by outcome and lag time. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval.

Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the association of hospital admissions for respiratory disease, asthma, pneumonia, and ischemic heart disease/acute myocardial infarction with Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days at lag 3. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. Diamonds represent the pooled random-effects estimates, with the width indicating the 95% CIs. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; RE, random effects. Random-effects pooled estimates (percentage changes) hospital admissions for Asian dust days vs. non-Asian dust days, stratified by outcome and lag time. Solid squares represent point estimates (percentage changes) of the individual studies, and the whiskers represent the 95% CIs. Arrowheads indicate where the CI extends outside the range allocated. The vertical dotted line represents a percentage change of 0. Note: CI, confidence interval. We repeated the analysis using only time-series and case-crossover studies by excluding Lai and Cheng 2008 from respiratory disease category, Yang et al. 2005b from asthma category and Cheng et al. 2008 from pneumonia category. The study selection did not affect the main results and interpretation (see Figure S6, Excel Table S6). The addition of two studies of hospital visits and emergency room visits (Nakamura et al. 2016; J Park et al. 2016) made the pooled estimates for asthma 1.4–1.8 times higher than the original (lag 1–3), whereas the pooled estimate for respiratory disease at lag 0 became significantly protective after adding five studies of hospital visits, emergency room visits, or ambulance transport (Chien et al. 2012; Lin et al. 2016; Nakamura et al. 2016; Ueda et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2012) (see Figure S7, Excel Table S7). The addition of one study of hospital visits for ischemic heart disease (Chan et al. 2008) at lag 0 did not change the interpretation (see Figure S7, Excel Table S7). Sensitivity analysis by excluding studies with largely overlapping periods in the same study location (the leave-one-out approach) showed that the pooled estimates were robust (see Figure S8, Excel Table S4).

Symptoms/Dysfunction

The most common outcome was respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, followed by eye, nasopharyngeal, and skin symptoms (Table 3). Daily PEF rates and symptoms (of asthmatic patients or healthy volunteers) were typically recorded in diaries and compared between dust and non-dust days. Of the 12 studies that examined the association between Asian dust exposure and PEF, 8 (66.7%) studies (Hong et al. 2010; Park et al. 2005; Watanabe et al. 2011b, 2015b, 2016a, 2016b, 2016c; Yoo et al. 2008) reported reduced PEF following exposure, although 1 (Watanabe et al. 2011b) reported reduced PEF only among individuals with existing lower respiratory symptoms. Four (33.3%) studies reported no evidence of an association with PEF (Watanabe et al. 2011a, 2014, 2015a, 2015c). Among the 21 studies that examined the association between Asian dust exposure and respiratory symptoms, 16 (76.2%) reported increased respiratory symptoms associated with Asian dust exposures (Table 3). Most studies that examined eye, nasopharyngeal, skin, and allergy symptoms reported increased risk of these symptoms during Asian dust events.

Discussion

In the present study, we reviewed epidemiologic studies that assessed the risk of mortality, hospital admissions, and symptoms/dysfunction associated with exposure to Asian dust. The results of the meta-analyses indicate an exposure to Asian dust was associated with an immediate increased risk of mortality from circulatory causes (lag 0) and a slower increased risk of mortality from respiratory causes (lag 3). Risk of hospital admissions for asthma or pneumonia also increased after exposure. There was little evidence of heterogeneity between the estimates for both mortality and hospital admissions when there was evidence of increased risk. There were substantial variations between the studies in dust concentrations on Asian dust days. Mean concentrations on Asian dust days varied by location, from in Kitakyushu, Japan, to in Seoul, South Korea (Lee et al. 2014). This could be partly explained by the differing definitions of Asian dust used in the studies. Among the 56 mortality and hospital admission studies, 25 studies used a local meteorological authority’s definition of Asian dust, and 18 studies set their own definition using PM of a certain diameter, with or without other indicators such as wind profile and LIDAR. For example, Tam et al. (2012a, 2012b) defined Asian dust days as when the following four conditions were met: a) air pollution ; b) ; c) predominant easterly wind profile; and d) at least three times higher concentrations of dust storm tracer elements than annual averages. Bell et al. (2008) used several definitions, such as days with in the city (Taipei) and days with at a background monitoring location. Nevertheless, the average concentrations varied by location (from in Incheon to in Seoul, Korea) even when using the same definition (Lee et al. 2013). A study tracking the mass concentration of aerosol along its transport route reported that the concentration decreased by one order of magnitude as the dust was transported from inland China to Japan (Mori et al. 2003). Dust concentrations on Asian dust days also appear to vary over time: In Taipei, Taiwan, concentrations on Asian dust days were reported as and in the late 1990s (Chan and Ng 2011; Chen et al. 2004) and decreased to and in the 2000s (Lee et al. 2014; Wang and Lin 2015). Eight mortality/hospitalization studies used LIDAR as an indicator of Asian dust with a certain threshold (Kanatani et al. 2010; Nakamura et al. 2015, 2016; Ueda et al. 2012) or as a continuous variable (Kashima et al. 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017) for the nonspherical extinction coefficient. LIDAR is an optical remote sensing technology that can distinguish nonspherical mineral dust particles from spherical nonmineral dust particles at certain heights (typically from the ground for epidemiological studies) (Shimizu et al. 2004, 2011; Sugimoto et al. 2003). The effect of Asian dust days can differ substantially by altitude and the cutoff values of the extinction coefficient (Ueda et al. 2014); interstudy comparability would therefore require a standardized definition of Asian dust. Variations in particle size and chemical and biological constituents have been reported (Cha et al. 2016; Ichinose et al. 2008b; Mori et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2003). Particle size was altered during long-range transport from inland China to Japan (Mori et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2003). Measurements of mass size distributions of aerosols have shown that 64% of total mass was attributable to coarse particles ( aerodynamic diameter), lower than the percentage of coarse particles reported for aerosols sampled in Beijing, China (93%) (Mori et al. 2003). The addition of sea salt during transport over the sea increased particle size, and between 60% and 91% of dust aerosols in southwestern Japan were reported to be mixed with sea salt and sulfate, whereas dust collected in China did not (Zhang et al. 2003). Previous studies have provided evidence for the effects of PM, especially , on systemic inflammation and heart rate variability (U.S. EPA 2009). Asian dust contains both coarse and fine particles (Mori et al. 2003), which may contribute to the effects on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. The main constituents of Asian dust are silica and alumina (Ichinose et al. 2008b), and crystalline silica and aluminum have been suggested to cause cytokine-mediated inflammatory responses in the murine lung (Eisenbarth et al. 2008; Ichinose et al. 2008b). Dust can mix with anthropogenic substances during long-range transport, changing its chemical composition by, for example, the addition of nitrates (Mori et al. 2003). Aerosols in the dust provide surfaces for chemical and physical reactions and serve as carriers of anthropogenic substances (Sun et al. 2005). Sulfate also accumulates on the surface of dust particles during transport from China to Japan; the formation of sulfate and nitrate on the surface of dust particles has been well documented by laboratory simulations, model calculations, and individual particle analysis (Dentener et al. 1996; Iwasaka et al. 1988; Okada et al. 1990; Song and Carmichael 2001; Sun et al. 2005; Underwood et al. 2001; Zhang and Iwasaka 1999). Sulfate in Asian dust has been shown to potentiate allergic reactions in mice (Hiyoshi et al. 2005). Asian dust particles transported at a lower altitude may contain higher levels of anthropogenic chemicals, consequently exerting more severe health effects. Higher levels of metals were found in Asian dust when the air masses passed through heavily industrial areas (Onishi et al. 2012). Ueda et al. (2012) found increases in ambulance dispatches on Asian dust days when air masses passed through industrial areas in China at an altitude of . The toxicity of Asian dust may, therefore, depend in part on its metal contents, but the sources of pollutants in Asian dust are not well understood, and the modifying effects of transport pathways on pollutant composition are complex. Another important characteristic of Asian dust involves microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Microorganisms in the dust can affect the immune system of individuals sensitive to those agents, and lipopolysaccharide and in the microorganisms are known to provoke immune responses (Willart and Lambrecht 2009). Asian dust with microbial contents was shown to enhance allergic lung inflammation in mice (Ichinose et al. 2006, 2008b), and inhalation of dust sand containing caused eosinophil infiltration in the murine airway (Ichinose et al. 2006). Heated desert sand, from which microorganisms had been removed, had less effect on allergic lung inflammation (Ichinose et al. 2008a). Studies have reported that atmospheric bacterial abundance can increase 10–100 times during Asian dust events (Cha et al. 2016; Hara and Zhang 2012), but aerosol bacterial communities near a dust source were more affected by wind activity (J Park et al. 2016). Some of the studies we reviewed simply compared health events on dust and non-dust (control) days, a procedure that may not fully account for time trends and seasonality as well as typical time-series and case-crossover analyses. Our sensitivity analyses, however, showed that limiting the data to the time-series regression and case-crossover studies did not affect the main results and interpretation. Still, differences in time-series studies such as the degrees of freedom used per year for the time variable, the covariates included in the analyses, and the lag and degrees of freedom used to control for weather variables imply that the nature of residual confounding may differ between studies. Despite these potential sources of heterogeneity, we found, in general, little evidence of heterogeneity between the estimates for both mortality and hospital admissions. This may be due to the meta-analyses being conducted in most cases by pooling the estimates of fewer than 10 studies and that some study-specific estimates were accompanied by large uncertainty (i.e., large CIs or standard error values). In such cases, the pooling may be influenced largely by a few study-specific estimates with small uncertainty, and the statistics to quantify the heterogeneity should be interpreted with caution. (Higgins and Green 2011) A standardized protocol for epidemiological studies would facilitate comparisons between studies. For example, one study (Stafoggia et al. 2016) employed a so-called EU reference method whereby multiple tools were used to establish dust events, including monitoring stations selected for regional background investigation of PM, back-trajectory calculations using a hybrid single-particle Lagrangian integrated trajectory model, remote sensing data (aerosol maps), satellite imagery, and meteorological charts to understand the transport mechanism, and chemical composition analysis of PM (Pey et al. 2013). By applying official EU methodologies (Escudero et al. 2007), it was possible to further estimate the separate, independent contribution of dust to the short-term health effects. There are some limitations to our study. First, chemical and biological components of Asian dust may interact and affect the risks. Studies investigating the effects of particle composition on health outcomes are scarce, and this association warrants further research. The components of Asian dust may vary from those of other dusts, thus the findings may not be applicable to other dust events. Second, the studies included in our meta-analysis compared risks between Asian dust and non-dust days, but the dust concentrations and duration of the events varied. Future studies should consider this when formulating exposure assessments. Distinguishing between local and long-range-transported dust is also worthwhile. Third, we did not conduct a meta-analysis for outcomes with fewer than three estimates; there may have been other effects. In addition, meta-analysis for the long-term effects was not done due to the lack of qualified studies. Fourth, we did not assess the quality of the overall body of evidence using the National Toxicology Program Office of Health Assessment and Translation framework or any other quality scale in the absence of a validated quality assessment tool for time-series and case-crossover designs that were commonly used for mortality and hospitalization studies. Finally, the estimates of the meta-analysis in this study are from a total of 21 studies and, at maximum, only 9 estimates for specific categories of the diseases: Future evidences are merited to strengthen our overall conclusion.

Conclusion

Overall, the existing evidence indicates a positive association between Asian dust exposure and mortality and hospital admissions for circulatory and respiratory events. However, the number of studies included in the meta-analysis was not large and further evidence is merited to strengthen our conclusions. Furthermore, a variety of definitions of Asian dust, study designs, confounder controls, and model specifications have been applied in the original studies. Standardized protocols for epidemiological studies are needed and should be taken into consideration the composition of the dust and a consistent definition of Asian dust. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  105 in total

1.  Effects of the Asian dust events on daily mortality in Seoul, Korea.

Authors:  Ho-Jang Kwon; Soo-Hun Cho; Youngsin Chun; Frederic Lagarde; Göran Pershagen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Short-term effects of particulate matter on total mortality during Saharan dust outbreaks: a case-crossover analysis in Madrid (Spain).

Authors:  Aurelio Tobías; Laura Pérez; Julio Díaz; Cristina Linares; Jorge Pey; Andrés Alastruey; Xavier Querol
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent selection strategies and their implications for bias.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Lianne Sheppard; Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The effect of Asian dust events on the daily symptoms in Yonago, Japan: a pilot study on healthy subjects.

Authors:  Shinji Otani; Kazunari Onishi; Haosheng Mu; Youichi Kurozawa
Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.663

5.  Desert dust is a risk factor for the incidence of acute myocardial infarction in Western Japan.

Authors:  Ryuichi Matsukawa; Takehiro Michikawa; Kayo Ueda; Hiroshi Nitta; Tomohiro Kawasaki; Hideki Tashiro; Masahiro Mohri; Yusuke Yamamoto
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-07-29

6.  Influences of socioeconomic vulnerability and intra-urban air pollution exposure on short-term mortality during extreme dust events.

Authors:  Hung Chak Ho; Man Sing Wong; Lin Yang; Ta-Chien Chan; Muhammad Bilal
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Effects of asian sand dust, Arizona sand dust, amorphous silica and aluminum oxide on allergic inflammation in the murine lung.

Authors:  Takamich Ichinose; Seiichi Yoshida; Kaori Sadakane; Hrohisa Takano; Rie Yanagisawa; Kenichi Inoue; Masataka Nishikawa; Ikuko Mori; Hiroaki Kawazato; Aiko Yasuda; Takayuki Shibamoto
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Effects on asthma and induction of interleukin-8 caused by Asian dust particles collected in western Japan.

Authors:  Masanari Watanabe; Jun Kurai; Katsuyuki Tomita; Hiroyuki Sano; Satoshi Abe; Rumiko Saito; Sayaka Minato; Tadashi Igishi; Naoto Burioka; Takanori Sako; Kazuhito Yasuda; Masaaki Mikami; Shinichi Kurita; Hirokazu Tokuyasu; Yasuto Ueda; Tatsuya Konishi; Akira Yamasaki; Setsuya Aiba; Mitsuo Oshimura; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.515

9.  Differences in the effects of Asian dust on pulmonary function between adult patients with asthma and those with asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome.

Authors:  Masanari Watanabe; Hisashi Noma; Jun Kurai; Hiroyuki Sano; Yasuto Ueda; Masaaki Mikami; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hirokazu Tokuyasu; Kazuhiro Kato; Tatsuya Konishi; Toshiyuki Tatsukawa; Eiji Shimizu; Hiroya Kitano
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2016-01-28

10.  Association between Asian Dust-Borne Air Pollutants and Daily Symptoms on Healthy Subjects: A Web-Based Pilot Study in Yonago, Japan.

Authors:  Abir Majbauddin; Kazunari Onishi; Shinji Otani; Yasunori Kurosaki; Youichi Kurozawa
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2016-12-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Asian dust storms result in a higher risk of the silicosis hospital admissions.

Authors:  Tsai-Ching Liu; Hui-Hsuan Tang; Shu-Yi Lei; Yu-I Peng
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 2.  Climate change and cardiovascular disease: implications for global health.

Authors:  Haitham Khraishah; Barrak Alahmad; Robert L Ostergard; Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Mazen Albaghdadi; Nirupama Vellanki; Mohammed M Chowdhury; Sadeer G Al-Kindi; Antonella Zanobetti; Antonio Gasparrini; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 49.421

3.  Differential Mortality Risks Associated With PM2.5 Components: A Multi-Country, Multi-City Study.

Authors:  Pierre Masselot; Francesco Sera; Rochelle Schneider; Haidong Kan; Éric Lavigne; Massimo Stafoggia; Aurelio Tobias; Hong Chen; Richard T Burnett; Joel Schwartz; Antonella Zanobetti; Michelle L Bell; Bing-Yu Chen; Yue-Liang Leon Guo; Martina S Ragettli; Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera; Christofer Åström; Bertil Forsberg; Carmen Íñiguez; Rebecca M Garland; Noah Scovronick; Joana Madureira; Baltazar Nunes; César De la Cruz Valencia; Magali Hurtado Diaz; Yasushi Honda; Masahiro Hashizume; Chris Fook Cheng Ng; Evangelia Samoli; Klea Katsouyanni; Alexandra Schneider; Susanne Breitner; Niilo R I Ryti; Jouni J K Jaakkola; Marek Maasikmets; Hans Orru; Yuming Guo; Nicolás Valdés Ortega; Patricia Matus Correa; Shilu Tong; Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.860

4.  Saharan Dust and Childhood Respiratory Symptoms in Benin.

Authors:  Sara McElroy; Anna Dimitrova; Amato Evan; Tarik Benmarhnia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Effect of Short-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter and Temperature on Acute Myocardial Infarction in Korea.

Authors:  Jiyoung Shin; Jongmin Oh; In Sook Kang; Eunhee Ha; Wook Bum Pyun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Simulation of the transition metal-based cumulative oxidative potential in East Asia and its emission sources in Japan.

Authors:  Mizuo Kajino; Hiroyuki Hagino; Yuji Fujitani; Tazuko Morikawa; Tetsuo Fukui; Kazunari Onishi; Tomoaki Okuda; Yasuhito Igarashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Respiratory function declines in children with asthma associated with chemical species of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Nagasaki, Japan.

Authors:  Yoonhee Kim; Eun Ha Park; Chris Fook Sheng Ng; Yeonseung Chung; Kunio Hashimoto; Kasumi Tashiro; Hideki Hasunuma; Masataka Doi; Kei Tamura; Hiroyuki Moriuchi; Yuji Nishiwaki; Hwajin Kim; Seung-Muk Yi; Ho Kim; Masahiro Hashizume
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Short-term exposure to stone minerals used in asphalt affect lung function and promote pulmonary inflammation among healthy adults.

Authors:  Therese Nitter Moazami; Bjørn Hilt; Kirsti Sørås; Kristin V Hirsch Svendsen; Hans Jørgen Dahlman; Magne Refsnes; Marit Låg; Johan Øvrevik; Rikke Bramming Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.492

9.  Mortality due to noninfectious lower respiratory diseases: A spatiotemporal, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Parastoo Amiri; Soheil Hashtarkhani; Ashraf Yazdizadeh; Leila Ahmadian
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07

10.  Dust Storms and Human Health: A Call for More Consistent, Higher-Quality Studies.

Authors:  Carrie Arnold
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.