Literature DB >> 23222010

Racial/ethnic differences in clinical quality performance among health centers.

Lydie A Lebrun1, Leiyu Shi, Jinsheng Zhu, Ravi Sharma, Alek Sripipatana, A Seiji Hayashi, Charles A Daly, Quyen Ngo-Metzger.   

Abstract

More than 1100 federally funded health centers provide primary and preventive care to about 20 million underserved patients in the United States. Since 2008, the Health Resources and Services Administration has implemented a clinical quality improvement initiative to measure and evaluate the quality of care across all health centers. We assessed racial/ethnic disparities in clinical quality among US health centers, and examined whether performance on quality measures varied across 3 health center characteristics. National data came from the 2009 Uniform Data System. We examined performance across 3 indicators of clinical quality: poorly controlled hypertension among adult patients, poorly controlled diabetes among adult patients, and low birth weight among newborns. We compared results for each measure across racial/ethnic groups, as well as across 3 health center characteristics: health center patient volume, duration of health center funding, and extent of managed care penetration. Non-Hispanic Asian patients had the best results among racial/ethnic groups for 2 of the 3 measures examined: lowest rates of poorly controlled diabetes (26%) and hypertension (34%). Hispanics/Latinos had similar rates of poor hypertension control compared with non-Hispanic whites (38% for both), and lower rates of low birth weight (8% vs 10%). Poor diabetes control was more prevalent among Hispanic/Latino patients than non-Hispanic white patients, but the absolute difference was small (5 percentage points). Non-Hispanic black/African American patients had statistically worse outcomes than non-Hispanic white patients, but the absolute differences were also small (2-6 percentage points, depending on outcome). Health centers with larger patient volume fared better than their counterparts with smaller volume for all racial/ethnic groups. For Hispanic/Latino patients, more established health centers compared favorably to new health centers for all 3 outcomes. Health centers with some managed care penetration did better for diabetes and hypertension control relative to health centers without managed care penetration. Compared with national rates, health centers report minimal racial/ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes. Health center characteristics are also associated with clinical outcomes. More research is needed to determine the nature of disparities after accounting for health center patient, provider, and institutional characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23222010     DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3182473523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage        ISSN: 0148-9917


  10 in total

1.  Barriers to Providing Health Education During Primary Care Visits at Community Health Centers: Clinical Staff Insights.

Authors:  Jessica Alicea-Planas; Alix Pose; Linda Smith
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

2.  Supportive Clinical Practice Environments Associated With Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  J Margo Brooks Carthon; Heather Brom; Lusine Poghosyan; Marguerite Daus; Barbara Todd; Linda Aiken
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 0.767

3.  State Variation in Quality Outcomes and Disparities in Outcomes in Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Megan B Cole; Ira B Wilson; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Information presentation features and comprehensibility of hospital report cards: design analysis and online survey among users.

Authors:  Uwe Sander; Martin Emmert; Jochen Dickel; Nina Meszmer; Benjamin Kolb
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Influenza vaccination among U.S. pediatric patients receiving care from federally funded health centers.

Authors:  Lydie A Lebrun-Harris; Judith A Mendel Van Alstyne; Alek Sripipatana
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Assessing clinical quality performance and staffing capacity differences between urban and rural Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers in the United States: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Nadereh Pourat; Xiao Chen; Connie Lu; Weihao Zhou; Hank Hoang; Alek Sripipatana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Longitudinal Analysis of Racial/Ethnic Trends in Quality Outcomes in Community Health Centers, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Megan B Cole; Brad Wright; Ira B Wilson; Omar Galárraga; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.473

8.  An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Florian Meier
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Florian Meier; Frank Pisch; Uwe Sander
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The Influence of Physician-Rating Websites on Patient Physician Preference.

Authors:  Ajith Malige; Kristofer S Matullo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-04-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.