Dong Zhao1, Fengmei Zhang, Wei Zhang, Jing He, Yulan Zhao, Jing Sun. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize the global predicting role of hormone receptors for survival in ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified and assessed for quality through multiple search strategies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall or progression-free/disease-free/relapse-free survival in patients with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with those in patients with lower levels. Studies were pooled, and combined hazards ratios (HRs) of ER, PR, and HER2 for survival were calculated, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included for meta-analysis (23 for ER, 19 for PR, and 8 for HER2). For overall survival, the pooled HR of PR reached 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-0.95], which means that elevated PR level could significantly indicate better survival. In contrast, elevated levels of HER2 could predict worse outcome with an HR of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.05-1.89). Increased level of ER was not significantly prognostic (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). For progression-free survival/disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, elevated PR level also had predictive value for better outcome with a pooled HR of PR of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.95). Oppositely, elevated HER2 level could predict poorer outcome with an HR of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.11-2.16). Estrogen receptor failed to predict outcome with an HR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ovarian cancer, elevated level of PR predicted favorable survival, and elevated level of HER2 was associated with worse survival.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize the global predicting role of hormone receptors for survival in ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified and assessed for quality through multiple search strategies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall or progression-free/disease-free/relapse-free survival in patients with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with those in patients with lower levels. Studies were pooled, and combined hazards ratios (HRs) of ER, PR, and HER2 for survival were calculated, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included for meta-analysis (23 for ER, 19 for PR, and 8 for HER2). For overall survival, the pooled HR of PR reached 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-0.95], which means that elevated PR level could significantly indicate better survival. In contrast, elevated levels of HER2 could predict worse outcome with an HR of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.05-1.89). Increased level of ER was not significantly prognostic (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01). For progression-free survival/disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, elevated PR level also had predictive value for better outcome with a pooled HR of PR of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.95). Oppositely, elevated HER2 level could predict poorer outcome with an HR of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.11-2.16). Estrogen receptor failed to predict outcome with an HR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ovarian cancer, elevated level of PR predicted favorable survival, and elevated level of HER2 was associated with worse survival.
Authors: Yi A Ren; Lisa K Mullany; Zhilin Liu; Alan J Herron; Kwong-Kwok Wong; JoAnne S Richards Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; Taylor Turner; Yiwen Deng; Sarah M Bean; Janet K Horton; Andrew Berchuck; Jeffrey R Marks; Mark W Dewhirst; Angeles Alvarez Secord Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Weiva Sieh; Martin Köbel; Teri A Longacre; David D Bowtell; Anna deFazio; Marc T Goodman; Estrid Høgdall; Suha Deen; Nicolas Wentzensen; Kirsten B Moysich; James D Brenton; Blaise A Clarke; Usha Menon; C Blake Gilks; Andre Kim; Jason Madore; Sian Fereday; Joshy George; Laura Galletta; Galina Lurie; Lynne R Wilkens; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Rayna K Matsuno; Susanne Krüger Kjær; Allan Jensen; Claus Høgdall; Kimberly R Kalli; Brooke L Fridley; Gary L Keeney; Robert A Vierkant; Julie M Cunningham; Louise A Brinton; Hannah P Yang; Mark E Sherman; Montserrat García-Closas; Jolanta Lissowska; Kunle Odunsi; Carl Morrison; Shashikant Lele; Wiam Bshara; Lara Sucheston; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Kristy Driver; Jennifer Alsop; Marie Mack; Valerie McGuire; Joseph H Rothstein; Barry P Rosen; Marcus Q Bernardini; Helen Mackay; Amit Oza; Eva L Wozniak; Elizabeth Benjamin; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Simon A Gayther; Anna V Tinker; Leah M Prentice; Christine Chow; Michael S Anglesio; Sharon E Johnatty; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Alice S Whittemore; Paul D P Pharoah; Ellen L Goode; David G Huntsman; Susan J Ramus Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 41.316