Literature DB >> 23221105

Bayesian modeling of pretransplant variables accurately predicts kidney graft survival.

Trevor S Brown1, Eric A Elster, Kristin Stevens, J Christopher Graybill, Suzanne Gillern, Samuel Phinney, Moro O Salifu, Rahul M Jindal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Machine learning can enable the development of predictive models that incorporate multiple variables for a systems approach to organ allocation. We explored the principle of Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to determine whether a predictive model of graft survival can be derived using pretransplant variables. Our hypothesis was that pretransplant donor and recipient variables, when considered together as a network, add incremental value to the classification of graft survival.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 5,144 randomly selected patients (age ≥18, deceased donor kidney only, first-time recipients) from the United States Renal Data System database between 2000 and 2001. Using this dataset, we developed a machine-learned BBN that functions as a pretransplant organ-matching tool.
RESULTS: A network of 48 clinical variables was constructed and externally validated using an additional 2,204 patients of matching demographic characteristics. This model was able to predict graft failure within the first year or within 3 years (sensitivity 40%; specificity 80%; area under the curve, AUC, 0.63). Recipient BMI, gender, race, and donor age were amongst the pretransplant variables with strongest association to outcome. A 10-fold internal cross-validation showed similar results for 1-year (sensitivity 24%; specificity 80%; AUC 0.59) and 3-year (sensitivity 31%; specificity 80%; AUC 0.60) graft failure.
CONCLUSION: We found recipient BMI, gender, race, and donor age to be influential predictors of outcome, while wait time and human leukocyte antigen matching were much less associated with outcome. BBN enabled us to examine variables from a large database to develop a robust predictive model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221105     DOI: 10.1159/000345552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  16 in total

1.  Predictive Score for Posttransplantation Outcomes.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Danh V Nguyen; Yanjun Chen; Vanessa Ravel; Elani Streja; Mahesh Krishnan; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rajnish Mehrotra; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Pre-transplant predictors of one yr weight gain after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  A K Cashion; D K Hathaway; A Stanfill; F Thomas; J D Ziebarth; Y Cui; P A Cowan; J Eason
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 3.  Machine learning, the kidney, and genotype-phenotype analysis.

Authors:  Rachel S G Sealfon; Laura H Mariani; Matthias Kretzler; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Sonya Cressman; Louisa Edwards; Steven Shechter; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Paul Keown; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Machine Learning for Renal Pathologies: An Updated Survey.

Authors:  Roberto Magherini; Elisa Mussi; Yary Volpe; Rocco Furferi; Francesco Buonamici; Michaela Servi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Risk Factors for 1-Year Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Farid Foroutan; Erik Loewen Friesen; Kathryn Elizabeth Clark; Shahrzad Motaghi; Roman Zyla; Yung Lee; Rakhshan Kamran; Emir Ali; Mitch De Snoo; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Christine Ribic; Darin J Treleaven; Gordon Guyatt; Maureen O Meade
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Prediction of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation: comparison between logistic regression and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Alexander Decruyenaere; Philippe Decruyenaere; Patrick Peeters; Frank Vermassen; Tom Dhaene; Ivo Couckuyt
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Using Artificial Intelligence Resources in Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Patients: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Alexandru Burlacu; Adrian Iftene; Daniel Jugrin; Iolanda Valentina Popa; Paula Madalina Lupu; Cristiana Vlad; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index.

Authors:  Sameera Senanayake; Sanjeewa Kularatna; Helen Healy; Nicholas Graves; Keshwar Baboolal; Matthew P Sypek; Adrian Barnett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  An adjustable predictive score of graft survival in kidney transplant patients and the levels of risk linked to de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

Authors:  Aurélie Prémaud; Matthieu Filloux; Philippe Gatault; Antoine Thierry; Matthias Büchler; Eliza Munteanu; Pierre Marquet; Marie Essig; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.