OBJECTIVE: Scripted consultations provide the opportunity to vary and study the effect of specific elements of medical communication. These scripted consultations are role-played, videotaped and then judged by analogue patients. Most studies applying this methodology have provided little insight into how they created internally and externally valid written and role-played scripts. In this paper we aim to address this gap by providing a detailed description of a scripted video-vignette study's methodology. METHODS: Following the five phases of creating and implementing scripted video-vignettes the current study's methodology is described: (1) deciding if video-vignettes are appropriate, (2) developing a valid script, (3) designing valid manipulations, (4) converting the scripted consultations to video, (5) administering the videos in an experiment. RESULTS: Following these phases and four validation steps internally and externally valid vignettes were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed description of the current study's methodology produced general recommendations for scripted video-vignette studies, such as the importance of validating both the written as well as the role-played scripts and involving both experts and lay people in validating the scripts. For other choices no golden standard exists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The presented methodology and recommendations may serve as a source of inspiration for future scripted video-vignette studies.
OBJECTIVE: Scripted consultations provide the opportunity to vary and study the effect of specific elements of medical communication. These scripted consultations are role-played, videotaped and then judged by analogue patients. Most studies applying this methodology have provided little insight into how they created internally and externally valid written and role-played scripts. In this paper we aim to address this gap by providing a detailed description of a scripted video-vignette study's methodology. METHODS: Following the five phases of creating and implementing scripted video-vignettes the current study's methodology is described: (1) deciding if video-vignettes are appropriate, (2) developing a valid script, (3) designing valid manipulations, (4) converting the scripted consultations to video, (5) administering the videos in an experiment. RESULTS: Following these phases and four validation steps internally and externally valid vignettes were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed description of the current study's methodology produced general recommendations for scripted video-vignette studies, such as the importance of validating both the written as well as the role-played scripts and involving both experts and lay people in validating the scripts. For other choices no golden standard exists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The presented methodology and recommendations may serve as a source of inspiration for future scripted video-vignette studies.
Authors: Leonie N C Visser; Nadine Bol; Marij A Hillen; Mathilde G E Verdam; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Julia C M van Weert; Ellen M A Smets Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Daniel Hausmann; Vera Kiesel; Lukas Zimmerli; Narcisa Schlatter; Amandine von Gunten; Nadine Wattinger; Thomas Rosemann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fiona A Forth; Florian Hammerle; Jochem König; Michael S Urschitz; Philipp Neuweiler; Eva Mildenberger; André Kidszun Journal: Trials Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 2.279