Literature DB >> 23219276

Predicting ex vivo failure loads in human metatarsals using bone strength indices derived from volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

David J Gutekunst1, Tarpit K Patel, Kirk E Smith, Paul K Commean, Matthew J Silva, David R Sinacore.   

Abstract

We investigated the capacity of bone quantity and bone geometric strength indices to predict ultimate force in the human second metatarsal (Met2) and third metatarsal (Met3). Intact lower extremity cadaver samples were measured using clinical, volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT) with positioning and parameters applicable to in vivo scanning. During processing, raw voxel data (0.4mm isotropic voxels) were converted from Hounsfield units to apparent bone mineral density (BMD) using hydroxyapatite calibration phantoms to allow direct volumetric assessment of whole-bone and subregional metatarsal BMD. Voxel data were realigned to produce cross-sectional slices perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the metatarsals. Average mid-diaphyseal BMD, bone thickness, and buckling ratio were measured using an optimized threshold to distinguish bone from non-bone material. Minimum and maximum moments of inertia and section moduli were measured in the mid-diaphysis region using both a binary threshold for areal, unit-density measures and a novel technique for density-weighted measures. BMD and geometric strength indices were strongly correlated to ultimate force measured by ex vivo 3-point bending. Geometric indices were more highly correlated to ultimate force than was BMD; bone thickness and density-weighted minimum section modulus had the highest individual correlations to ultimate force. Density-weighted geometric indices explained more variance than their binary analogs. Multiple regression analyses defined models that predicted 85-89% of variance in ultimate force in Met2 and Met3 using bone thickness and minimum section modulus in the mid-diaphysis. These results have implications for future in vivo imaging to non-invasively assess bone strength and metatarsal fracture risk.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219276      PMCID: PMC3568236          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  35 in total

1.  Increasing sex difference in bone strength in old age: The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES-REYKJAVIK).

Authors:  Gunnar Sigurdsson; Thor Aspelund; Milan Chang; Birna Jonsdottir; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Adalsteinn Gudmundsson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus using multi-detector CT: correlation with microCT and biomechanical testing.

Authors:  Gerd Diederichs; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Patrik Rogalla; Ahi S Issever
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Strength indices from pQCT imaging predict up to 85% of variance in bone failure properties at tibial epiphysis and diaphysis.

Authors:  S A Kontulainen; J D Johnston; D Liu; C Leung; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Tao Ju; Lu Liu; David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Strains in the metatarsals during the stance phase of gait: implications for stress fractures.

Authors:  S W Donahue; N A Sharkey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Thomas J Beck; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosla; Sara J Achenbach; Ann L Oberg; B Lawrence Riggs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone adaptation to a mechanical loading program significantly increases skeletal fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Julie A Hurst; Megan S Sanders; Charles H Turner; David B Burr; Jiliang Li
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone formation after damaging in vivo fatigue loading results in recovery of whole-bone monotonic strength and increased fatigue life.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Daniel C Touhey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; F Duboeuf; A M Schott; P Dargent-Molina; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?

Authors:  A Z LaCroix; T J Beck; J A Cauley; C E Lewis; T Bassford; R Jackson; G Wu; Z Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Candidate Imaging Marker for Early Detection of Charcot Neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Kirk E Smith; Charles F Hildebolt; Kathryn L Bohnert; David R Sinacore; Fred W Prior
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Pedal bone density, strength, orientation, and plantar loads preceding incipient metatarsal fracture after charcot neuroarthropathy: 2 case reports.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; David R Sinacore
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of human metatarsals: precision, least significant change and association to ex vivo fracture force.

Authors:  Kathryn L Bohnert; David J Gutekunst; Charles F Hildebolt; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-31

4.  Impact of Charcot neuroarthropathy on metatarsal bone mineral density and geometric strength indices.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; Kirk E Smith; Paul K Commean; Kathryn L Bohnert; Fred W Prior; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Accelerated Cortical Osteolysis of Metatarsals in Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Authors:  David R Sinacore; Kirk E Smith; Kathryn L Bohnert; David J Gutekunst; Jeffrey E Johnson; Michael J Strube
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-11-05

6.  Reproducibility of a peripheral quantitative computed tomography scan protocol to measure the material properties of the second metatarsal.

Authors:  Elodie Chaplais; David Greene; Anita Hood; Scott Telfer; Verona du Toit; Davinder Singh-Grewal; Joshua Burns; Keith Rome; Daniel J Schiferl; Gordon J Hendry
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.