Literature DB >> 23217279

Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies.

David Hailey1, Sophie Werkö, Rugayah Bakri, Alun Cameron, Britta Göhlen, Susan Myles, Jasmine Pwu, Jomkwan Yothasamut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To obtain further information from members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) on the involvement of consumers in their programs.
METHODS: A questionnaire for a survey was developed and sent to member agencies in November 2010. Survey responses were compared with those from an earlier survey conducted in 2005.
RESULTS: Of the thirty-three agencies that provided responses, 67 percent involve consumers in some aspects of their health technology assessment (HTA) programs, compared with 57 percent in 2005. As in the earlier survey, most agencies reporting involvement have contact with consumer or patient organizations and a large minority also involve individual consumers. Summaries of HTA reports that are intended to be easily understood by consumers are prepared by 84 percent of the agencies, and 42 percent involve consumers in dissemination of HTA material. In both areas, there was some increase from the levels previously reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest that there is a trend to increased involvement of consumers by the INAHTA agencies in their programs but that the level of involvement remains relatively limited. The manner of consumer participation varies between agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23217279     DOI: 10.1017/S026646231200075X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  11 in total

1.  Developing Guidance on Ethics for Patient Groups Collecting and Reporting Patient Information for Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Ann N V Single; Anna M Scott; Janet Wale
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid; Victoria Thomas; Toni Shaw; Gillian Leng
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Importance of hemodialysis-related outcomes: comparison of ratings by a self-help group, clinicians, and health technology assessment authors with those by a large reference group of patients.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Fueloep Scheibler; Ansgar Gerhardus
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire).

Authors:  Merel L Kimman; Adrienne H Rotteveel; Marlies Wijsenbeek; Rémy Mostard; Nelleke C Tak; Xana van Jaarsveld; Marjolein Storm; Kioa L Wijnsma; Marielle Gelens; Nicole C A J van de Kar; Jack Wetzels; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Co-construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Pomey; Philippe Brouillard; Isabelle Ganache; Laurie Lambert; Lucy Boothroyd; Caroline Collette; Sylvain Bédard; Alexandre Grégoire; Sandra Pelaez; Olivier Demers-Payette; Mireille Goetghebeur; Michèle de Guise; Denis Roy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.

Authors:  Anna Mae Scott; Janet L Wale
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-01-10

7.  Including the public perspective in health-related MCDA: ideas from the field of public opinion research and polling.

Authors:  Gillian K SteelFisher
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-11-09

8.  Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire.

Authors:  Merel L Kimman; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Sander M J van Kuijk; Kioa L Wijnsma; Nicole C A J van de Kar; Marjolein Storm; Xana van Jaarsveld; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.

Authors:  Wija Oortwijn; Maarten Jansen; Rob Baltussen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2020-01-01

10.  Information Patients With Melanoma Spontaneously Report About Health-Related Quality of Life on Web-Based Forums: Case Study.

Authors:  Rachel R J Kalf; Diana M J Delnoij; Bettina Ryll; Marcel L Bouvy; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.