| Literature DB >> 23217148 |
Jia-Xing Zhang1, Xiao-Xia Huang, Man-Bo Cai, Zhu-Ting Tong, Jie-Wei Chen, Dong Qian, Yi-Ji Liao, Hai-Xia Deng, Ding-Zhun Liao, Ma-Yan Huang, Yi-Xin Zeng, Dan Xie, Shi-Juan Mai.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The secretory small GTPase Rab27b was recently identified as an oncogene in breast cancer (BC) in vivo and in vitro studies. This research was designed to further explore the clinical and prognostic significance of Rab27B in BC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23217148 PMCID: PMC3539959 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1The expression pattern of Rab27B in BC tissues. (A) Western blot analysis of Rab27B protein expression in 8 representative paired BCs (T) and NATs (N). Equal loading of protein is shown by α-tubulin. (B) Rab27B mRNA and protein expression in human BCs (T) and NATs (N) by Real-time PCR (left panel) and IHC analysis (right panel). Rab27B mRNA and protein expression in 12 primary BCs is upregulated compared to their NATs. (C) Negative staining of Rab27B in normal breast tissue. (D) Weak staining of Rab27B in FA. (E) Moderate staining of Rab27B in DCIS. (F) BC cells showing strong staining of Rab27B. (G) Strong Rab27B staining in metastatic lymph nodes. (H) Statistical analysis revealed a significantly ascending pattern of Rab27B expression ranging from NAT to BC to distant metastases nodes.
The corresponding cutoff socre of Rab27B expression for each clinicapathological feature according to ROC curve analysis
| Histology grade | I(n = 47) vs. IIIII (n = 174) | >3 | 0.014* |
| Tumor size stage | T1 (n = 63) vs. T2 + T3 (n = 158) | >2 | 0.917 |
| Lymph nodes metastasis | absent (n = 105) vs. present (n = 116) | >2 | 0.064 |
| Clinical stage | I II(n = 181) vs. III (n = 40) | >4 | 0.046* |
| Live status | Live (n-171) vs. death (n = 50) | >3 | < 0.001* |
*Statistically significant difference.
The expression of Rab27B in normal breast tissues and in benign and malignant breast tumors
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal breast tissues | 22 | 22(100%) | 0(0%) | |
| Fibroadenoma of breast | 40 | 35(87.5%) | 5(12.5%) | |
| Ductal carcinoma in situ | 30 | 23(76.7%) | 7(23.3%) | |
| Invasive breast cancer | 221 | 114(51.6%) | 107(48.4%) | |
| Metastatic lymph nodes | 40 | 10(25.0%) | 30(75.0%) | <0.001* |
*Statistically significant difference.
Relationship between Rab27B expression level and clinicopathologic parameters of BC
| | | | | |
| ≥ 47a | 103 | 46(44.7%) | 57(55.3%) | |
| < 47 | 118 | 61(51.7%) | 57(48.3%) | 0.297 |
| | | | | |
| I | 47 | 15(31.9%) | 32(69.1%) | |
| IIIII | 174 | 92(52.9%) | 82(47.1%) | 0.011* |
| | | | | |
| III | 181 | 80(44.2%) | 101(55.8%) | |
| III | 40 | 27(67.5%) | 13(32.5%) | 0.008* |
| | | | | |
| T1 | 63 | 32(50.8%) | 31(49.2%) | |
| T2 + T3 | 158 | 82(51.9%) | 76(48.1%) | 0.883 |
| | | | | |
| Absent | 90 | 53(58.9%) | 37(41.1%) | |
| Present | 131 | 61(46.6%) | 70(53.4%) | 0.072 |
| | | | | |
| Metastasis | 116 | 65(56.0%) | 51(44.0%) | |
| No metastasis | 105 | 42(40.0%) | 63(60.0%) | 0.021* |
| | | | | |
| Negative | 97 | 37(38.1%) | 60(61.9%) | |
| Positive | 124 | 70(56.5%) | 54(43.5%) | 0.007* |
| | | | | |
| Negative | 91 | 39(42.9%) | 52(57.1%) | |
| Positive | 130 | 68(52.3%) | 62(47.7%) | 0.166 |
| | | | | |
| 0,1+,2+ | 147 | 74(50.3%) | 73(49.7%) | |
| 3+ | 74 | 33(44.6%) | 41(55.4%) | 0.42 |
| | | | | |
| Live | 170 | 63(37.1%) | 107(62.9%) | |
| Dead | 51 | 44(86.3%) | 7(13.7%) | <0.001* |
BC breast cancer. a Mean age. *Statistically significant difference.
Figure 2Influence of Rab27B expression on disease-specific survival of BC patients. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves show that patients with elevated Rab27B expression have poor disease-specific survival by analyzing 221 primary BC tissues (P < 0.001). Patients with high Rab27B expression have worse disease-specific survival in the stage III group (Panel B) and in the stage III group (Panel C); Survival time is shorter in patients with high Rab27B expression with T 1 stage (Panel D) or T 1+ T 2 stage (Panel E); Survival time is shorter in patients with high Rab27B expression whether in the lymph node metastasis group (Panel F) and in the no lymph node metastasis group (Panel G).
Results of univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis for disease-specific survival
| | | | | |
| Age | ≥47a yr (n = 103) vs. <47 yr (n = 117) | 1.654 | 0.931-2.938 | 0.086 |
| Histology grade | I (n = 47) vs. IIIII (n = 174) | 7.696 | 1.871-31.651 | 0.005* |
| Clinical stage | I II (n = 181) vs. III (n = 40) | 4.059 | 2.318-7.016 | <0.001* |
| Tumor size stage | T1 (n = 63) vs. T2 + T3 (n = 158) | 2.799 | 1.260-6.219 | 0.011* |
| Lymph nodes metastasis | absent (n = 105) vs. present (n = 116) | 3.361 | 1.759-6.422 | <0.001* |
| Menopausal status | absent (n = 131) vs. present (n = 90) | 1.549 | 0.857-2.798 | 0.147 |
| Rab27B expression | low (n = 107) vs. high (n = 114) | 8.661 | 3.897-19.251 | <0.001* |
| ER status | absent (==97) vs. present (n = 124) | 0.588 | 0.339-1.022 | 0.06 |
| PR status | absent (n = 91) vs. present (n = 130) | 0.505 | 0.291-0.878 | 0.015* |
| CerbB2 status | 0, 1+, 2+ (n = 147) vs. 3+ (n = 74) | 1.504 | 0.861-2.628 | 0.152 |
| | | |||
| Histology grade | I (n = 47) vs. IIIII (n = 174) | 4.808 | 1.154-20.030 | 0.031* |
| Tumour size | T1 (n = 63) vs. T2 + T3 (n = 158) | 2.630 | 1.167-5.924 | 0.020* |
| Lynph nodes metastasis | absent (n = 105) vs. present (n = 116) | 2.696 | 1.398-5.197 | 0.003* |
| Rab27B expression | low (n = 107) vs. high (n = 114) | 9.120 | 4.056-20.506 | <0.001* |
| PR status | absent (n = 91) vs. present (n = 130) | 0.412 | 0.233-0.729 | 0.002* |
a Mean age. Cox propotional hazard regression model, enter; HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; *Statistically significant difference.
Figure 3Correlation between the expression of Rab27B and EMT markers in BC tissues. (A) High expression of Rab27B in BC was accompanied by elevated level of vimentin, fibronectin, and absence of E-cadherin, β-catenin (upper panel). (B) Low expression of Rab27B in BC was accompanied by absence of vimentin, fibronectin, and elevated level of E-cadherin, β-catenin (lower panel).