| Literature DB >> 25382899 |
Wei Wang1, Qichao Ni2, Hua Wang2, Shu Zhang1, Huijun Zhu1.
Abstract
Rab proteins of the endocytosis and exocytosis pathways both play critical roles in cancer progression, and Rab27B has a significant relationship with several types of human cancer. However, the association between Rab27B expression and clinical features to determine its clinicopathological significance in gastrointestinal tumor (GIST) has not been investigated. To examine the expression of Rab27B in GIST and investigate the association between its expression and patient prognosis, immunohistochemistry analysis with tissue microarray was used to evaluate expression of Rab27B in 162 patients with GIST. The relationship between Rab27B expression and patient prognosis was analyzed. High nuclear staining of Rab27B was detected in 88 of 162 (54.32%) GIST tissues. Positive staining of Rab27B was significantly associated with tumor size (P = 0.006), mitotic index (P = 0.013), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen risk classification (P = 0.002), and tumor grade (P = 0.021). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that GIST patients with low Rab27B nuclear expression (P = 0.038) and mitotic index <5 per 50 high-power fields (P = 0.029) had a more favorable prognosis. These findings indicate that Rab27B nuclear expression is correlated with several clinicopathological features of GIST patients, and it may serve as an unfavorable prognostic marker.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25382899 PMCID: PMC4213986 DOI: 10.1155/2014/942181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1IHC staining of Rab27B in clinical tissue samples of GIST. ((a1), (a2)) High nuclear staining of Rab27B in GIST TMA samples. ((b1), (b2)) High cytoplasmic staining of Rab27B in GIST TMA samples. ((c1), (c2)) Negative staining for Rab27B in GIST TMA samples. Original magnification: ((a1), (b1), (c1)) ×40, ((a2), (b2), (c2)) ×400.
Association of Rab27B expression with clinical parameters of GIST.
| Groups | Number | Rab27B | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low or no expression (%) | High expression (%) | Pearson |
| ||
| Total |
|
|
| ||
| Gender | 0.012 | 0.913 | |||
| Male | 73 | 33 (45.21) | 40 (54.79) | ||
| Female | 89 | 41 (46.07) | 48 (53.93) | ||
| Age | 0.054 | 0.816 | |||
| ≤60 years | 98 | 44 (44.90) | 54 (55.10) | ||
| >60 years | 62 | 29 (46.77) | 33 (53.23) | ||
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Tumor size | 10.228 | 0.006∗ | |||
| <5 cm | 40 | 21 (52.50 | 19 (47.50) | ||
| 5–10 cm | 78 | 41 (52.56) | 37 (47.44) | ||
| ≥10 cm | 36 | 8 (22.22) | 28 (77.78) | ||
| Unknown | 8 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Mitotic index (per 50 HPFs) | 8.639 | 0.013∗ | |||
| 0–5 | 67 | 38 (56.72) | 29 (43.28) | ||
| 6–10 | 54 | 24 (44.44) | 30 (55.56) | ||
| >10 | 26 | 6 (23.08) | 20 (76.92) | ||
| Unknown | 15 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Gross classification | 0.184 | 0.668 | |||
| Single nodule | 11 | 4 (36.36) | 7 (63.64) | ||
| Multiple nodules | 18 | 8 (44.44) | 10 (55.56) | ||
| Unknown | 133 | 62 | 71 | ||
| Tumor location | 0.571 | 0.752 | |||
| Stomach | 81 | 37 (45.68) | 44 (54.32) | ||
| Intestine | 56 | 24 (42.86) | 32 (57.14) | ||
| Others | 23 | 12 (52.17) | 11 (47.83) | ||
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AFIP Miettinen risk classification | 9.182 | 0.002∗ | |||
| Very low-low risk | 34 | 20 (58.82) | 14 (41.18) | ||
| Moderate-high risk | 41 | 10 (24.39) | 31 (75.61) | ||
| Unknown | 87 | 44 | 43 | ||
| Grade | 9.703 | 0.021∗ | |||
| 1 | 48 | 30 (62.50) | 18 (37.50) | ||
| 2 | 60 | 27 (45.00) | 33 (55.00) | ||
| 3 | 28 | 8 (28.57) | 20 (71.43) | ||
| 4 | 10 | 3 (30.00) | 7 (70.00) | ||
| Unknown | 16 | 6 | 10 | ||
* P < 0.05; HPFs: high-power fields.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in GIST for 5-year survival.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR |
| 95% CI | HR |
| 95% CI | |||
| Rab27B expression | ||||||||
| High versus low | 2.61 | 0.009∗ | 1.384 | 9.843 | 2.07 | 0.038∗ | 1.070 | 10.925 |
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male versus female | −1.52 | 0.128 | .250 | 1.191 | ||||
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| ≤60 versus >60 | 0.32 | 0.746 | .531 | 2.423 | ||||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||||||
| <5 versus 5–10 versus ≥10 | 2.57 | 0.010∗ | 1.202 | 3.894 | ||||
| Mitotic index (per 50 HPFs) | ||||||||
| 0–5 versus 6–10 versus >10 | 4.37 | <0.001∗ | 1.885 | 5.287 | 2.18 | 0.029∗ | 1.236 | 50.063 |
| Gross classification | ||||||||
| Single versus multiple | 0.47 | 0.639 | .337 | 5.904 | ||||
| Tumor position | ||||||||
| Stomach versus intestine versus others | 0.28 | 0.782 | .629 | 1.850 | ||||
| AFIP Miettinen risk classification | ||||||||
| Very low-low risk versus moderate-high risk | 1.97 | 0.049∗ | 1.003 | 8.178 | ||||
| Tumor grade | ||||||||
| Stages I-II versus Stages III-IV | 4.18 | <0.001∗ | 1.560 | 3.415 | ||||
* P < 0.05.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier analysis of the relationship between clinicopathological factors and OS of GIST patients. OS was significantly longer in patients with (a) low (blue line) or no versus high Rab27B expression (green line) and (b) low (blue line) versus large mitotic index (yellow and green line).