| Literature DB >> 23216895 |
Duarte Ferreira1, Abílio Oliveira, Alberto Freitas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperbilirubinemia is emerging as an increasingly common problem in newborns due to a decreasing hospital length of stay after birth. Jaundice is the most common disease of the newborn and although being benign in most cases it can lead to severe neurological consequences if poorly evaluated. In different areas of medicine, data mining has contributed to improve the results obtained with other methodologies.Hence, the aim of this study was to improve the diagnosis of neonatal jaundice with the application of data mining techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23216895 PMCID: PMC3557145 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
Comparison of the accuracy of traditional risk assessment strategies (adapted from Keren & Bhutani, 2007)
| CRF | |||
| Chou, 2003 | Indication for phototherapy | 0.69 | not reported |
| Chou, 2003 | TSB > 20 mg/dl; | 0.79 | not reported |
| Keren, 2005 | TSB > 95th percentile | 0.71 | (0.66-0.76) |
| Newman, 2005 | TSB > 20 mg/dl | 0.69 | not reported |
| Newman, 2005 | TSB > 25 mg/dl | 0.83 | (0.77-0.89) |
| Pre-discharge TSB | |||
| Keren, 2005 | TSB > 95th percentile | 0.83 | (0.80-0.86) |
| Newman, 2005 | TSB > 20 mg/dl | 0.79 | (0.77-0.81) |
| Newman, 2005 | TSB > 25 mg/dl | 0.83 | (0.77-0.89) |
| Combination of TSB and CRF | |||
| Newman, 2005 | TSB > 20 mg/dl | 0.86 | (0.84-0.88) |
AUC – Area under the receiving-operator characteristic curve; CI – Confidence interval; CRF – Clinical risk factors; TSB – Total serum bilirubin.
Comparison of the application of different algorithms to data subsets in terms of accuracy and specificity (for sensitivity of 90%)
| | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | (0.42-0.52) | 0.09 | 0.79 | (0.74-0.84) | 0.43 | 0.75 | (0.70-0.80) | 0.33 | |
| 0.46 | (0.41-0.51) | 0.10 | 0.76 | (0.71-0.81) | 0.42 | 0.77 | (0.72-0.82) | 0.41 | |
| 0.72 | (0.67-0.77) | 0.38 | 0.82 | (0.77-0.87) | 0.54 | 0.88 | (0.84-0.92) | 0.56 | |
| 0.74 | (0.69-0.79) | 0.42 | 0.73 | (0.68-0.78) | 0.35 | 0.87 | (0.83-0.91) | 0.60 | |
| 0.70 | (0.65-0.75) | 0.35 | 0.84 | (0.80-0.88) | 0.53 | 0.81 | (0.76-0.86) | 0.50 | |
| 0.53 | (0.48-0.58) | 0.15 | 0.50 | (0.45-0.55) | 0.12 | 0.72 | (0.67-0.77) | 0.54 | |
| 0.72 | (0.67-0.77) | 0.39 | 0.80 | (0.75-0.85) | 0.41 | 0.89 | (0.85-0.93) | 0.56 | |
MP – Multilayer Perceptron; SMO – Sequential Minimal Optimization; AUC – Area under the receiving-operator characteristic curve; CI – Confidence interval; SPE – Specificity; CRF – Clinical Risk Factors; TcB – Transcutaneous bilirubin.