Literature DB >> 19497782

Predicting the graft survival for heart-lung transplantation patients: an integrated data mining methodology.

Asil Oztekin1, Dursun Delen, Zhenyu James Kong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting the survival of heart-lung transplant patients has the potential to play a critical role in understanding and improving the matching procedure between the recipient and graft. Although voluminous data related to the transplantation procedures is being collected and stored, only a small subset of the predictive factors has been used in modeling heart-lung transplantation outcomes. The previous studies have mainly focused on applying statistical techniques to a small set of factors selected by the domain-experts in order to reveal the simple linear relationships between the factors and survival. The collection of methods known as 'data mining' offers significant advantages over conventional statistical techniques in dealing with the latter's limitations such as normality assumption of observations, independence of observations from each other, and linearity of the relationship between the observations and the output measure(s). There are statistical methods that overcome these limitations. Yet, they are computationally more expensive and do not provide fast and flexible solutions as do data mining techniques in large datasets.
PURPOSE: The main objective of this study is to improve the prediction of outcomes following combined heart-lung transplantation by proposing an integrated data-mining methodology.
METHODS: A large and feature-rich dataset (16,604 cases with 283 variables) is used to (1) develop machine learning based predictive models and (2) extract the most important predictive factors. Then, using three different variable selection methods, namely, (i) machine learning methods driven variables-using decision trees, neural networks, logistic regression, (ii) the literature review-based expert-defined variables, and (iii) common sense-based interaction variables, a consolidated set of factors is generated and used to develop Cox regression models for heart-lung graft survival.
RESULTS: The predictive models' performance in terms of 10-fold cross-validation accuracy rates for two multi-imputed datasets ranged from 79% to 86% for neural networks, from 78% to 86% for logistic regression, and from 71% to 79% for decision trees. The results indicate that the proposed integrated data mining methodology using Cox hazard models better predicted the graft survival with different variables than the conventional approaches commonly used in the literature. This result is validated by the comparison of the corresponding Gains charts for our proposed methodology and the literature review based Cox results, and by the comparison of Akaike information criteria (AIC) values received from each.
CONCLUSIONS: Data mining-based methodology proposed in this study reveals that there are undiscovered relationships (i.e. interactions of the existing variables) among the survival-related variables, which helps better predict the survival of the heart-lung transplants. It also brings a different set of variables into the scene to be evaluated by the domain-experts and be considered prior to the organ transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497782     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  15 in total

1.  Applying the Temporal Abstraction Technique to the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression.

Authors:  Li-Chen Cheng; Ya-Han Hu; Shr-Han Chiou
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A Prognosis Tool Based on Fuzzy Anthropometric and Questionnaire Data for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity.

Authors:  Kung-Jeng Wang; Kun-Huang Chen; Shou-Hung Huang; Nai-Chia Teng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.

Authors:  Peter B Jensen; Lars J Jensen; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Pretransplant prediction of posttransplant survival for liver recipients with benign end-stage liver diseases: a nonlinear model.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Fei Yin; Bo Chen; You Ping Li; Lu Nan Yan; Tian Fu Wen; Bo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Linking clinotypes to phenotypes and genotypes from laboratory test results in comprehensive physical exams.

Authors:  Sisi Zeng; Ni Cao; Thanh Nguyen; Tongbin Zhang; Geoffrey Fox; Chuandi Pan; Jake Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 6.  Epidemiology of lung cancer and approaches for its prediction: a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Dubey; Umesh Gupta; Sonal Jain
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-07-30

7.  A Machine Learning Approach Using Survival Statistics to Predict Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyung Don Yoo; Junhyug Noh; Hajeong Lee; Dong Ki Kim; Chun Soo Lim; Young Hoon Kim; Jung Pyo Lee; Gunhee Kim; Yon Su Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Machine learning-based prediction of health outcomes in pediatric organ transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Michael O Killian; Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri; Dipankar Gupta; Dev Desai; Zhe He
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-03-12

9.  Applying data mining techniques to improve diagnosis in neonatal jaundice.

Authors:  Duarte Ferreira; Abílio Oliveira; Alberto Freitas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Opinion versus practice regarding the use of rehabilitation services in home care: an investigation using machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Lu Cheng; Mu Zhu; Jeffrey W Poss; John P Hirdes; Christine Glenny; Paul Stolee
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.