BACKGROUND: Irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads represent a novel drug delivery method that allows for the locoregional delivery of irinotecan to colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The method has shown impressive response rates. However, the pathological response to this treatment has not previously been demonstrated. METHODS: Patients with easily resectable CRLM were treated with drug-eluting beads delivering irinotecan (DEBIRI) 4 weeks prior to resection. Pathological tumour response was graded using a validated system. The intraoperative detection of previously unidentified disease allowed for the assessment of pathological responses directly attributable to bead treatment. RESULTS: In Patient 1, segmental embolization of the target lesion in segment VIII resulted in 100% necrosis (0% viability). An untreated lesion in segment IV was found to be 30% viable. In Patient 2, subsegmental embolization of the target lesion in segment VI resulted in 60% necrosis and 40% fibrosis (0% viability). An untreated lesion in segment VI remained 60% viable. In Patient 3, lobar embolization of the target lesion in segment II resulted in 0% viability. Two further lesions within the treated hemiliver, both with 0% viability, and one lesion in the untreated hemiliver with 45% viability were discovered at laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the effectiveness of DEBIRI in the treatment of CRLM. High rates of tumour destruction are possible, even with the proximal lobar administration of DEBIRI. Lobar administration appears to be an appropriate method of delivery for integration into future therapeutic regimens.
BACKGROUND:Irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads represent a novel drug delivery method that allows for the locoregional delivery of irinotecan to colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The method has shown impressive response rates. However, the pathological response to this treatment has not previously been demonstrated. METHODS:Patients with easily resectable CRLM were treated with drug-eluting beads delivering irinotecan (DEBIRI) 4 weeks prior to resection. Pathological tumour response was graded using a validated system. The intraoperative detection of previously unidentified disease allowed for the assessment of pathological responses directly attributable to bead treatment. RESULTS: In Patient 1, segmental embolization of the target lesion in segment VIII resulted in 100% necrosis (0% viability). An untreated lesion in segment IV was found to be 30% viable. In Patient 2, subsegmental embolization of the target lesion in segment VI resulted in 60% necrosis and 40% fibrosis (0% viability). An untreated lesion in segment VI remained 60% viable. In Patient 3, lobar embolization of the target lesion in segment II resulted in 0% viability. Two further lesions within the treated hemiliver, both with 0% viability, and one lesion in the untreated hemiliver with 45% viability were discovered at laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the effectiveness of DEBIRI in the treatment of CRLM. High rates of tumour destruction are possible, even with the proximal lobar administration of DEBIRI. Lobar administration appears to be an appropriate method of delivery for integration into future therapeutic regimens.
Authors: R Adam; E Avisar; A Ariche; S Giachetti; D Azoulay; D Castaing; F Kunstlinger; F Levi; F Bismuth Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: George A Poultsides; Fei Bao; Elliot L Servais; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Yuman Fong; Nancy E Kemeny; Leonard B Saltz; David S Klimstra; William R Jarnagin; Jinru Shia; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Dana Tomalty; Marshall Schreeder; Tiffany Metzger; Clifton Tatum; Vivek Sharma Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Giammaria Fiorentini; Camillo Aliberti; Massimo Tilli; Luca Mulazzani; Francesco Graziano; Paolo Giordani; Andrea Mambrini; Francesco Montagnani; Paolo Alessandroni; Vincenzo Catalano; Paolo Coschiera Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Dan G Blazer; Yoji Kishi; Dipen M Maru; Scott Kopetz; Yun Shin Chun; Michael J Overman; David Fogelman; Cathy Eng; David Z Chang; Huamin Wang; Daria Zorzi; Dario Ribero; Lee M Ellis; Katrina Y Glover; Robert A Wolff; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nancy E Kemeny; Fidel D Huitzil Melendez; Marinela Capanu; Philip B Paty; Yuman Fong; Lawrence H Schwartz; William R Jarnagin; Dina Patel; Michael D'Angelica Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexander Massmann; Thomas Rodt; Steffen Marquardt; Roland Seidel; Katrina Thomas; Frank Wacker; Götz M Richter; Hans U Kauczor; Arno Bücker; Philippe L Pereira; Christof M Sommer Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.445