Literature DB >> 23216509

Totally laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a matched cohort study.

Fabio Cianchi1, Etleva Qirici, Giacomo Trallori, Giuseppe Macrì, Giampiero Indennitate, Manuela Ortolani, Beatrice Paoli, Maria Rosa Biagini, Andrea Galli, Luca Messerini, Beatrice Mallardi, Benedetta Badii, Fabio Staderini, Giuliano Perigli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer is still controversial, particularly in terms of oncologic efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection for gastric cancer at a single Western institution. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a matched cohort study from a prospective gastric cancer database. Forty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer between June 2008 and January 2012 were matched with 41 patients undergoing open gastrectomy in the same time period. Patient pairing was done according to age, gender, type of gastrectomy (subtotal or total), and tumor stage via a randomized statistical method. The short-term outcomes and oncologic adequacy of the laparoscopic and open procedures were compared. A D2 lymph node dissection was performed in the majority of patients in both groups.
RESULTS: The two study groups were similar with respect to patient and tumor characteristics. Laparoscopic procedures were associated with a decreased blood loss (118.7 versus 312.4 mL, P<.005), incidence of surgery-unrelated complications (3 versus 9 patients, P<.05), and duration of hospital stay (8.1 versus 11.5 days, P<.05) but increased operative time for both subtotal (223.5 versus 158.2 minutes, P<.001) and total (298.1 versus 185.5 minutes, P<.001) gastrectomies. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes after D2 dissection was similar: 30.0 for laparoscopic and 29.7 for open patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of a nonrandomized analysis, this study shows that the laparoscopic approach is a safe and oncologically adequate option for the treatment of gastric cancer, which compares favorably with open gastrectomy in short-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23216509     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  12 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 2.  Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Jia-Qin Cai; Xiao-Wu Xu; Di Wu; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].

Authors:  Kaja Ludwig; Christian Barz; Uwe Scharlau
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Surgical techniques, open versus minimally invasive gastrectomy after chemotherapy (STOMACH trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Straatman; Nicole van der Wielen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Koen J Hartemink; Alfredo Alonso Poza; Jürgen Weitz; Fransico Mateo Vallejo; Khurshid Ahktar; Ismael Diez Del Val; Josep Roig Garcia; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™): a preliminary, single institution experience.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Giuseppe Macrì; Giampiero Indennitate; Beatrice Mallardi; Giacomo Trallori; Maria Rosa Biagini; Benedetta Badii; Fabio Staderini; Giuliano Perigli
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-14

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparotomic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Alexandre Garção Ramagem; Marcelo Linhares; Croider Franco Lacerda; Paulo Anderson Bertulucci; Durval Wonrath; Antônio Talvane Torres de Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015

8.  Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Giampiero Indennitate; Giacomo Trallori; Manuela Ortolani; Beatrice Paoli; Giuseppe Macrì; Gabriele Lami; Beatrice Mallardi; Benedetta Badii; Fabio Staderini; Etleva Qirici; Antonio Taddei; Maria Novella Ringressi; Luca Messerini; Luca Novelli; Siro Bagnoli; Andrea Bonanomi; Caterina Foppa; Ileana Skalamera; Giulia Fiorenza; Giuliano Perigli
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Short-term outcomes in minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy: the differences between East and West. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicole van der Wielen; Jennifer Straatman; Miguel A Cuesta; Freek Daams; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Xue-Yong Zheng; Yu Pan; Ke Chen; Jia-Qi Gao; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.