OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of insertion angle on stability of loaded titanium microscrews in beagle jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight microscrews were inserted at four different angles (30°, 50°, 70°, and 90°) into the intraradicular zones of the mandibular first molars and third premolars of 12 beagles and immediately loaded with a force of 2 N for 8 weeks. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and biomechanical pull-out tests were used to assess osseointegration of the interface. RESULTS: All micro-CT parameters and maximum pull-out force (FMAX) of the microscrews were affected by insertion angles of microscrews. Higher micro-CT parameters and FMAX were seen for implants inserted at angles between 50° and 70° (P < .05). Excessive oblique and vertical insertion angles resulted in reduced stability (P < .05). CONCLUSION: An insertion angle of 50° to 70° is more favorable than excessive oblique or vertical angles to achieve stability of microscrews.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of insertion angle on stability of loaded titanium microscrews in beagle jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight microscrews were inserted at four different angles (30°, 50°, 70°, and 90°) into the intraradicular zones of the mandibular first molars and third premolars of 12 beagles and immediately loaded with a force of 2 N for 8 weeks. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and biomechanical pull-out tests were used to assess osseointegration of the interface. RESULTS: All micro-CT parameters and maximum pull-out force (FMAX) of the microscrews were affected by insertion angles of microscrews. Higher micro-CT parameters and FMAX were seen for implants inserted at angles between 50° and 70° (P < .05). Excessive oblique and vertical insertion angles resulted in reduced stability (P < .05). CONCLUSION: An insertion angle of 50° to 70° is more favorable than excessive oblique or vertical angles to achieve stability of microscrews.
Authors: T Albrektsson; E Dahl; L Enbom; S Engevall; B Engquist; A R Eriksson; G Feldmann; N Freiberg; P O Glantz; O Kjellman Journal: J Periodontol Date: 1988-05 Impact factor: 6.993