Literature DB >> 23211940

Reliability of core needle biopsy for determining ER and HER2 status in breast cancer.

T J A Dekker1, V T H B M Smit, G K J Hooijer, M J Van de Vijver, W E Mesker, R A E M Tollenaar, J W R Nortier, J R Kroep.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have assessed the concordance of estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and resection specimens, usually in small patient series and with discordant results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ER and HER2 status determined on CNB and tissue micro-arrays of resected tumors were compared for patients treated at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). When results were discordant, whole-sized slides were analyzed. Additionally, literature was searched for published patient series and combined with our data to assess the concordance of ER and HER2 determination between CNB and resection specimens.
RESULTS: In the LUMC series, concordance for ER status was 99.1%. Combined concordance from 20 studies and the LUMC patient series was 93.7%. For HER2 testing, concordance was 96.2% for patients in the LUMC series. Our study and three others have investigated the concordance when HER2 was determined according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of Pathology guidelines and overall concordance was 97.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was high for both ER and HER2 testing. However, we recommend retesting ER-negative CNB results on the surgical specimen and performing in situ hybridization assays on HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ CNBs to confirm HER2 status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23211940     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Excision Specimens for the Accurate Evaluation of Breast Cancer Molecular Markers: a Report of 1003 Cases.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Zu Wang; Qing Lv; Zhenggui Du; Qiuwen Tan; Di Zhang; Bingjun Xiong; Helin Zeng; Juxiang Gou
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision for breast cancer tumor grade and biomarkers.

Authors:  Aswin Shanmugalingam; Kerry Hitos; Shrenik Hegde; Ali Al-Mashat; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Senarath Edirimmane; T Michael Hughes; Nicholas K Ngui
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens.

Authors:  Javier I J Orozco; Shu-Ching Chang; Diego M Marzese; Janie G Grumley; Chikako Matsuba; Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez; Gary L Grunkemeier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Concomitant use of 18F-FDG PET-CT SUVmax is useful in the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in core-needle biopsy specimens of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakajima; Kazuma Maeno; Tokiko Ito; Toshiharu Kanai; Takaaki Oba; Mayu Ono; Fumiyoshi Takayama; Tsuyoshi Uehara; Ken-Ichi Ito
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 5.  Hormonal Modulation of Breast Cancer Gene Expression: Implications for Intrinsic Subtyping in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Bernhardt; Pallave Dasari; David Walsh; Amanda R Townsend; Timothy J Price; Wendy V Ingman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: overall positivity rate and accuracy by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in a single institution over 12 years: a quality control study.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Aurelia Noske; Constanze Ramach; Barbara Padberg; Holger Moch
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Quantification of HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer-implications for identification of sub-dominant clones for personalised treatment.

Authors:  Niamh E Buckley; Claire Forde; Darragh G McArt; David P Boyle; Paul B Mullan; Jacqueline A James; Perry Maxwell; Stephen McQuaid; Manuel Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Tumour sampling method can significantly influence gene expression profiles derived from neoadjuvant window studies.

Authors:  Dominic A Pearce; Laura M Arthur; Arran K Turnbull; Lorna Renshaw; Vicky S Sabine; Jeremy S Thomas; John M S Bartlett; J Michael Dixon; Andrew H Sims
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A prospective comparison of ER, PR, Ki67 and gene expression in paired sequential core biopsies of primary, untreated breast cancer.

Authors:  Sirwan M Hadad; Lee B Jordan; Pankaj G Roy; Colin A Purdie; Takayuki Iwamoto; Lajos Pusztai; Stacy L Moulder-Thompson; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens in Determining Intrinsic Biological Subtypes of Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Kiho You; Sungmin Park; Jai Min Ryu; Isaac Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Jonghan Yu; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.