BACKGROUND: Several studies have assessed the concordance of estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and resection specimens, usually in small patient series and with discordant results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ER and HER2 status determined on CNB and tissue micro-arrays of resected tumors were compared for patients treated at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). When results were discordant, whole-sized slides were analyzed. Additionally, literature was searched for published patient series and combined with our data to assess the concordance of ER and HER2 determination between CNB and resection specimens. RESULTS: In the LUMC series, concordance for ER status was 99.1%. Combined concordance from 20 studies and the LUMC patient series was 93.7%. For HER2 testing, concordance was 96.2% for patients in the LUMC series. Our study and three others have investigated the concordance when HER2 was determined according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of Pathology guidelines and overall concordance was 97.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was high for both ER and HER2 testing. However, we recommend retesting ER-negative CNB results on the surgical specimen and performing in situ hybridization assays on HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ CNBs to confirm HER2 status.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have assessed the concordance of estrogen receptor (ER) and humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and resection specimens, usually in small patient series and with discordant results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ER and HER2 status determined on CNB and tissue micro-arrays of resected tumors were compared for patients treated at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). When results were discordant, whole-sized slides were analyzed. Additionally, literature was searched for published patient series and combined with our data to assess the concordance of ER and HER2 determination between CNB and resection specimens. RESULTS: In the LUMC series, concordance for ER status was 99.1%. Combined concordance from 20 studies and the LUMCpatient series was 93.7%. For HER2 testing, concordance was 96.2% for patients in the LUMC series. Our study and three others have investigated the concordance when HER2 was determined according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of Pathology guidelines and overall concordance was 97.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was high for both ER and HER2 testing. However, we recommend retesting ER-negative CNB results on the surgical specimen and performing in situ hybridization assays on HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ CNBs to confirm HER2 status.
Authors: Aswin Shanmugalingam; Kerry Hitos; Shrenik Hegde; Ali Al-Mashat; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Senarath Edirimmane; T Michael Hughes; Nicholas K Ngui Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Javier I J Orozco; Shu-Ching Chang; Diego M Marzese; Janie G Grumley; Chikako Matsuba; Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez; Gary L Grunkemeier Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sarah M Bernhardt; Pallave Dasari; David Walsh; Amanda R Townsend; Timothy J Price; Wendy V Ingman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Niamh E Buckley; Claire Forde; Darragh G McArt; David P Boyle; Paul B Mullan; Jacqueline A James; Perry Maxwell; Stephen McQuaid; Manuel Salto-Tellez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Dominic A Pearce; Laura M Arthur; Arran K Turnbull; Lorna Renshaw; Vicky S Sabine; Jeremy S Thomas; John M S Bartlett; J Michael Dixon; Andrew H Sims Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sirwan M Hadad; Lee B Jordan; Pankaj G Roy; Colin A Purdie; Takayuki Iwamoto; Lajos Pusztai; Stacy L Moulder-Thompson; Alastair M Thompson Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Kiho You; Sungmin Park; Jai Min Ryu; Isaac Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Jonghan Yu; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.588