Literature DB >> 23211778

The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform.

Brendan Nyhan1, Jason Reifler, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Misperceptions are a major problem in debates about health care reform and other controversial health issues.
METHODS: We conducted an experiment to determine if more aggressive media fact-checking could correct the false belief that the Affordable Care Act would create "death panels." Participants from an opt-in Internet panel were randomly assigned to either a control group in which they read an article on Sarah Palin's claims about "death panels" or an intervention group in which the article also contained corrective information refuting Palin.
FINDINGS: The correction reduced belief in death panels and strong opposition to the reform bill among those who view Palin unfavorably and those who view her favorably but have low political knowledge. However, it backfired among politically knowledgeable Palin supporters, who were more likely to believe in death panels and to strongly oppose reform if they received the correction.
CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the difficulty of reducing misperceptions about health care reform among individuals with the motivation and sophistication to reject corrective information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23211778     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318279486b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  The doxastic shear pin: delusions as errors of learning and memory.

Authors:  S K Fineberg; P R Corlett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.871

2.  Social sampling and expressed attitudes: Authenticity preference and social extremeness aversion lead to social norm effects and polarization.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Stephan Lewandowsky; Zhihong Huang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Olivia Fenton; Kelsey Martin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

4.  Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks.

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia; Prashant Shiralkar; Luis M Rocha; Johan Bollen; Filippo Menczer; Alessandro Flammini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Checking facts and fighting back: Why journalists should defend their profession.

Authors:  Raymond J Pingree; Brian Watson; Mingxiao Sui; Kathleen Searles; Nathan P Kalmoe; Joshua P Darr; Martina Santia; Kirill Bryanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  News credibility labels have limited average effects on news diet quality and fail to reduce misperceptions.

Authors:  Kevin Aslett; Andrew M Guess; Richard Bonneau; Jonathan Nagler; Joshua A Tucker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 14.957

7.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician "rationing".

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.464

9.  Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  S E Kreps; D L Kriner
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  COVID-19 and Motivated Reasoning: The Influence of Knowledge on COVID-Related Policy and Health Behavior.

Authors:  Steven M Sylvester
Journal:  Soc Sci Q       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.