BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inadequate feeding assistance and mealtime interruptions during hospitalisation may contribute to malnutrition and poor nutritional intake in older people. This study aimed to implement and compare three interventions designed to specifically address mealtime barriers and improve energy intakes of medical inpatients aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS: Pre-post study compared three mealtime assistance interventions: PM: Protected Mealtimes with multidisciplinary education; AIN: additional assistant-in-nursing (AIN) with dedicated meal role; PM + AIN: combined intervention. Dietary intake of 254 patients (pre: n = 115, post: n = 141; mean age 80 ± 8) was visually estimated on a single day in the first week of hospitalisation and compared with estimated energy requirements. Assistance activities were observed and recorded. RESULTS: Mealtime assistance levels significantly increased in all interventions (p < 0.01). Post-intervention participants were more likely to achieve adequate energy intake (OR = 3.4, p = 0.01), with no difference noted between interventions (p = 0.29). Patients with cognitive impairment or feeding dependency appeared to gain substantial benefit from mealtime assistance interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Protected Mealtimes and additional AIN assistance (implemented alone or in combination) may produce modest improvements in nutritional intake. Targeted feeding assistance for certain patient groups holds promise; however, alternative strategies are required to address the complex problem of malnutrition in this population. AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: ACTRN12609000525280. Crown
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inadequate feeding assistance and mealtime interruptions during hospitalisation may contribute to malnutrition and poor nutritional intake in older people. This study aimed to implement and compare three interventions designed to specifically address mealtime barriers and improve energy intakes of medical inpatients aged ≥ 65 years. METHODS: Pre-post study compared three mealtime assistance interventions: PM: Protected Mealtimes with multidisciplinary education; AIN: additional assistant-in-nursing (AIN) with dedicated meal role; PM + AIN: combined intervention. Dietary intake of 254 patients (pre: n = 115, post: n = 141; mean age 80 ± 8) was visually estimated on a single day in the first week of hospitalisation and compared with estimated energy requirements. Assistance activities were observed and recorded. RESULTS: Mealtime assistance levels significantly increased in all interventions (p < 0.01). Post-intervention participants were more likely to achieve adequate energy intake (OR = 3.4, p = 0.01), with no difference noted between interventions (p = 0.29). Patients with cognitive impairment or feeding dependency appeared to gain substantial benefit from mealtime assistance interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Protected Mealtimes and additional AIN assistance (implemented alone or in combination) may produce modest improvements in nutritional intake. Targeted feeding assistance for certain patient groups holds promise; however, alternative strategies are required to address the complex problem of malnutrition in this population. AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: ACTRN12609000525280. Crown
Authors: Barbara S van der Meij; Hanneke A H Wijnhoven; Jung S Lee; Denise K Houston; Trisha Hue; Tamara B Harris; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Marjolein Visser Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alison M Mudge; Merrilyn D Banks; Adrian G Barnett; Irene Blackberry; Nicholas Graves; Theresa Green; Gillian Harvey; Ruth E Hubbard; Sharon K Inouye; Sue Kurrle; Kwang Lim; Prue McRae; Nancye M Peel; Jessica Suna; Adrienne M Young Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.921