The intimate link between housing and health on Indian reservations reaches back to the genesis of the reservations themselves, when, beginning in the 1850s and ’60s, the U.S. Government began inducing tribes “to give up their old homes by the promise of assistance in building new ones.” That promise wasn’t always met, and even when it was, the tribes weren’t necessarily better off: By the 1870s, some of the first federally funded homes were recognized as substandard by government Indian agents, who noted some were devoid of furniture, in poor condition, decaying rapidly, and in some cases uninhabitable.The problem worsened through the early twentieth century and into the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s, when a housing boom funded by HUD and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) resulted in the construction of tens of thousands of single-family homes modeled on post-war tract housing. Built to federal rather than local or state codes, these new wood-frame homes were constructed without regard for local climate. “If you go from reservation to reservation, you see this same house,” says Daniel Glenn, a Seattle-based architect who specializes in sustainable and affordable housing on tribal lands. “People would freeze in them in Montana and overheat in them in Arizona.”They also were built with no regard for deep-rooted tribal customs, which vary widely across the country and bear on living arrangements, food-preparation practices, and heating preferences. Furthermore, the lack of trained inspectors on most reservations meant that builders were rarely scrutinized and thus were prone to cut corners.Today, these “HUD homes,” along with ill-equipped trailers and other substandard homes, are at the root of many tribes’ mold and indoor air quality issues. And a severe housing shortage—at least 250,000 new housing units are needed on reservations nationwide—amplifies the problem by accelerating wear and tear and contributing to indoor moisture levels as more occupants cook, bathe, and simply breathe in each home. Approximately one-third of Native homes are considered overcrowded, with large extended families often sharing one- and two-bedroom homes.The era of the undersize, cookie-cutter HUD house is ending, however, thanks to the Native American Housing and Self-Determination Act (NAHASDA) of 1996, which granted tribes authority over the use of HUD funds. “From that point on, American Indian people living on reservations had their own ability to dictate the types of houses that they’d build,” Glenn says. “A big part of the message of HUD now is to say, ‘You’ve got this freedom to build whatever you want to build.’”Tribes also have the freedom to formalize their new designs by developing codes to replace the less-suitable or ill-adapted codes previously used on their reservations. The outcome, in many cases, has been a hybrid of modern green design elements and indigenous knowledge passed down through the generations. This lineage, partially severed by the onset of the reservation era, is now poised to recover and to merge with the vanguard of contemporary homebuilding.
Curtis Munoz, environmental director for the Kiowa Tribe in Oklahoma, began researching the link between mold and health in tribal homes in the mid-2000s, when he served as a member of the National EPA–Tribal Science Council. “No matter where I called, they had problems with mold and indoor air quality,” he says. “Mold is causing a lot of problems in the health of our people.”But the science he needed to confirm the connection was at best incomplete and often contentious. Despite the prevalence of mold and other toxicants in substandard or poorly maintained tribal homes, neither the Native American Indian Housing Council, a tribal-housing advocacy group based in Washington, DC, nor the Indian Health Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, has prioritized study of the relationship between indoor air quality and human health. Munoz addressed this disparity in a June 2010 presentation to the National EPA–Tribal Science Council, where he called for new clinical research to complement existing case studies on indoor air quality and health effects in tribal homes.Meanwhile, increased awareness has paved the way for incremental improvements. The Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium recently launched a four-year plan to visit 60 existing Alaska Native homes and measure a host of indoor air pollutants before and after improving ventilation and replacing outdated stoves with cleaner-burning models. Unpublished preliminary results show that “after work in the first fifteen homes, we did see reductions in carbon dioxide, [particulate matter], and volatile organic compounds,” says program manager Aaron Salkoski. “In addition, the caregivers have reported better respiratory health for the children in our study.”building envelope: the outer shell of a building that physically separates interior and exterior environments.grey water: water generated from domestic activities such as laundry, dishwashing, and bathing that is used onsite for landscape irrigation and constructed wetlands.ground-sourced heat pump: a central heating system that relies on underground boreholes to store and extract heat.passive heating and cooling: the process of using natural sunlight, shade, and wind to heat and cool a home through building orientation, materials, and other design features.rainwater catchment: the collection and storage of rainwater, usually from a building’s roof, for use both outdoors and, when properly treated, inside the home.rooftop solar panels: used to supplement or replace grid electricity during the daytime.Etzel, now working on prevention of health problems from household air pollution in Milwaukee homes, joins Munoz in calling for more research and systematic surveys on indoor air quality in general, but particularly on tribal lands and in Native villages. “There are huge gaps in our knowledge about a variety of serious diseases among people that may be linked to poor air quality in their homes, and these health consequences are potentially preventable,” she says.Native peoples face many environmental health challenges resulting from a variety of factors. Although some risk factors for diseases—such as genetic predisposition—cannot be changed, others can, and Etzel says it is within our power to do something about exposures to contaminants in indoor air. “I feel quite strongly that we should take preventive action to improve household air quality,” she says, “because we know that this will improve the health of children and families.”
Authors: Elizabeth Hoover; Katsi Cook; Ron Plain; Kathy Sanchez; Vi Waghiyi; Pamela Miller; Renee Dufault; Caitlin Sislin; David O Carpenter Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 9.031