BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use and concomitant resistance are increasing. Literature reviews do not unambiguously indicate which interventions are most effective in improving antibiotic prescribing practice. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of physician-targeted interventions aiming to improve antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care, and to identify intervention features mostly contributing to intervention success. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of a set of physician-targeted interventions in primary care. METHOD: A literature search (1990-2009) for studies describing the effectiveness of interventions aiming to optimise antibiotic prescription for RTIs by primary care physicians. Intervention features were extracted and effectiveness sizes were calculated. Association between intervention features and intervention success was analysed in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: This study included 58 studies, describing 87 interventions of which 60% significantly improved antibiotic prescribing; interventions aiming to decrease overall antibiotic prescription were more frequently effective than interventions aiming to increase first choice prescription. On average, antibiotic prescription was reduced by 11.6%, and first choice prescription increased by 9.6%. Multiple interventions containing at least 'educational material for the physician' were most often effective. No significant added value was found for interventions containing patient-directed elements. Communication skills training and near-patient testing sorted the largest intervention effects. CONCLUSION: This review emphasises the importance of physician education in optimising antibiotic use. Further research should focus on how to provide physicians with the relevant knowledge and tools, and when to supplement education with additional intervention elements. Feasibility should be included in this process.
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use and concomitant resistance are increasing. Literature reviews do not unambiguously indicate which interventions are most effective in improving antibiotic prescribing practice. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of physician-targeted interventions aiming to improve antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care, and to identify intervention features mostly contributing to intervention success. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of a set of physician-targeted interventions in primary care. METHOD: A literature search (1990-2009) for studies describing the effectiveness of interventions aiming to optimise antibiotic prescription for RTIs by primary care physicians. Intervention features were extracted and effectiveness sizes were calculated. Association between intervention features and intervention success was analysed in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: This study included 58 studies, describing 87 interventions of which 60% significantly improved antibiotic prescribing; interventions aiming to decrease overall antibiotic prescription were more frequently effective than interventions aiming to increase first choice prescription. On average, antibiotic prescription was reduced by 11.6%, and first choice prescription increased by 9.6%. Multiple interventions containing at least 'educational material for the physician' were most often effective. No significant added value was found for interventions containing patient-directed elements. Communication skills training and near-patient testing sorted the largest intervention effects. CONCLUSION: This review emphasises the importance of physician education in optimising antibiotic use. Further research should focus on how to provide physicians with the relevant knowledge and tools, and when to supplement education with additional intervention elements. Feasibility should be included in this process.
Authors: Thomas W Hennessy; Kenneth M Petersen; Dana Bruden; Alan J Parkinson; Debby Hurlburt; Marilyn Getty; Benjamin Schwartz; Jay C Butler Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-05-21 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lars Småbrekke; Dag Berild; Anton Giaever; Torni Myrbakk; Airin Fuskevåg; Johanna U Ericson; Trond Flaegstad; Orjan Olsvik; Signe H Ringertz Journal: Scand J Infect Dis Date: 2002
Authors: E González Ochoa; L Armas Pérez; J R Bravo González; J Cabrales Escobar; R Rosales Corrales; G Abreu Suárez Journal: Bull Pan Am Health Organ Date: 1996-06
Authors: Robert A Greene; Howard Beckman; John Chamberlain; Greg Partridge; Marla Miller; Diane Burden; Jamie Kerr Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ralph Gonzales; Angela Sauaia; Kitty K Corbett; Judith H Maselli; Kathleen Erbacher; Bonnie A Leeman-Castillo; Carol A Darr; Peter M Houck Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M L van Driel; S Coenen; K Dirven; J Lobbestael; I Janssens; P Van Royen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; M De Meyere; J De Maeseneer; T Christiaens Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-06
Authors: Christopher C Butler; Mandy Lau; David Gillespie; Eleri Owen-Jones; Mark Lown; Mandy Wootton; Philip C Calder; Antony J Bayer; Michael Moore; Paul Little; Jane Davies; Alison Edwards; Victoria Shepherd; Kerenza Hood; F D Richard Hobbs; Mina Davoudianfar; Heather Rutter; Helen Stanton; Rachel Lowe; Richard Fuller; Nick A Francis Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul Little; Beth Stuart; Nick Francis; Elaine Douglas; Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Sibyl Anthierens; Jochen W L Cals; Hasse Melbye; Miriam Santer; Michael Moore; Samuel Coenen; Chris C Butler; Kerenza Hood; Mark Kelson; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Artur Mierzecki; Antoni Torres; Carl Llor; Melanie Davies; Mark Mullee; Gilly O'Reilly; Alike van der Velden; Adam W A Geraghty; Herman Goossens; Theo Verheij; Lucy Yardley Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jun Rong Jeffrey Neo; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ole Vielemeyer; Brandyn Lau; Michelle Demetres; Hessam Sadatsafavi Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Aditi Patel; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Anita D Misra Hebert; Alexander Chaitoff; Aryeh Shapiro; Niyati Gupta; Michael B Rothberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 5.128