Literature DB >> 23210490

Transforming the healthcare response to intimate partner violence and taking best practices to scale.

Michele R Decker1, Shannon Frattaroli, Brigid McCaw, Ann L Coker, Elizabeth Miller, Phyllis Sharps, Wendy G Lane, Mahua Mandal, Kelli Hirsch, Donna M Strobino, Wendy L Bennett, Jacquelyn Campbell, Andrea Gielen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent among adolescent and adult women, with significant physical, sexual, and mental health consequences. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine's Clinical Preventive Services for Women consensus report recommended universal screening for violence as a component of women's preventive services; this policy has been adopted by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). These policy developments require that effective clinic-based interventions be identified, easily implemented, and taken to scale.
METHODS: To foster dialogue about implementing effective interventions, we convened a symposium entitled "Responding to Violence Against Women: Emerging Evidence, Implementation Science, and Innovative Interventions," on May 21, 2012. Drawing on multidisciplinary expertise, the agenda integrated data on the prevalence and health impact of IPV violence, with an overview of the implementation science framework, and a panel of innovative IPV screening interventions. Recommendations were generated for developing, testing, and implementing clinic-based interventions to reduce violence and mitigate its health impact.
RESULTS: The strength of evidence supporting specific IPV screening interventions has improved, but the optimal implementation and dissemination strategies are not clear. Implementation science, which seeks to close the evidence to program gap, is a useful framework for improving screening and intervention uptake and ensuring the translation of research findings into routine practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings have substantial relevance to the broader research, clinical, and practitioner community. Our conference proceedings fill a timely gap in knowledge by informing practitioners as they strive to implement universal IPV screening and guiding researchers as they evaluate the success of implementing IPV interventions to improve women's health and well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23210490      PMCID: PMC3654819          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  31 in total

1.  Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Campbell; Alison Snow Jones; Jacqueline Dienemann; Joan Kub; Janet Schollenberger; Patricia O'Campo; Andrea Carlson Gielen; Clifford Wynne
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-27

2.  The effects of an abusive primary partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of African-American women.

Authors:  G M Wingood; R J DiClemente
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  HIV-positive women report more lifetime partner violence: findings from a voluntary counseling and testing clinic in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Suzanne Maman; Jessie K Mbwambo; Nora M Hogan; Gad P Kilonzo; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Ellen Weiss; Michael D Sweat
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Health care's response to women exposed to partner violence: moving beyond universal screening.

Authors:  C Nadine Wathen; Harriet L MacMillan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Keith E Davis; Ileana Arias; Sujata Desai; Maureen Sanderson; Heather M Brandt; Paige H Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Effect of screening for partner violence on women's quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne Klevens; Romina Kee; William Trick; Diana Garcia; Francisco R Angulo; Robin Jones; Laura S Sadowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Beyond screening for domestic violence: a systems model approach in a managed care setting.

Authors:  B McCaw; W H Berman; S L Syme; E F Hunkeler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Health consequences of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  AMA diagnostic and treatment guidelines concerning child abuse and neglect. Council on Scientific Affairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

1.  Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs in the Veterans Health Administration: Informing Scale-up of Successful Practices.

Authors:  Katherine M Iverson; Omonyêlé Adjognon; Alessandra R Grillo; Melissa E Dichter; Cassidy A Gutner; Alison B Hamilton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Megan R Gerber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion.

Authors:  Traci Kazmerski; Heather L McCauley; Kelley Jones; Sonya Borrero; Jay G Silverman; Michele R Decker; Daniel Tancredi; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

3.  Implementation of a Family Planning Clinic-Based Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion Intervention: Provider and Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Michele R Decker; Rebecca Levenson; Sarah Zelazny; Kelley A Jones; Heather Anderson; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-03-08

4.  How you screen is as important as whether you screen: a qualitative analysis of violence screening practices in reproductive health clinics.

Authors:  Daesha V Ramachandran; Laura Covarrubias; Catherine Watson; Michele R Decker
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

5.  Intimate relationship dynamics and women's expected control over sex and contraception.

Authors:  Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Heather L McCauley; Kelley A Jones; Heather Anderson; Lisa James; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Integrating intimate partner violence assessment and intervention into healthcare in the United States: a systems approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Brigid McCaw; Betsy L Humphreys; Connie Mitchell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Adolescent and young adult women's recommendations for establishing comfort with family planning providers' communication about and assessment for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Sarah My Zelazny; Judy C Chang; Jessica G Burke; Mary Hawk; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2019-01-11

9.  The process, outcomes, and challenges of feasibility studies conducted in partnership with stakeholders: a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Judith Wuest; Marilyn Merritt-Gray; Norma Dubé; Marilyn J Hodgins; Jeannie Malcolm; Jo Ann Majerovich; Kelly Scott-Storey; Marilyn Ford-Gilboe; Colleen Varcoe
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES).

Authors:  Daniel J Tancredi; Jay G Silverman; Michele R Decker; Heather L McCauley; Heather A Anderson; Kelley A Jones; Samantha Ciaravino; Angela Hicks; Claire Raible; Sarah Zelazny; Lisa James; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.