OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential impact of banning tobacco displays and ads at the point of sale (POS) on youth outcomes. METHODS: An interactive virtual convenience store was created with scenarios in which the tobacco product display at the POS was either openly visible (status quo) or enclosed behind a cabinet (display ban), and tobacco ads in the store were either present or absent. A national convenience sample of 1216 youth aged 13 to 17 who were either smokers or nonsmokers susceptible to smoking participated in the study. Youth were randomized to 1 of 6 virtual store conditions and given a shopping task to complete in the virtual store. During the shopping task, we tracked youth's attempts to purchase tobacco products. Subsequently, youth completed a survey that assessed their perceptions about the virtual store and perceptions about the ease of buying cigarettes from the virtual store. RESULTS: Compared with youth in the status quo condition, youth in the display ban condition were less aware that tobacco products were for sale (32.0% vs 85.2%) and significantly less likely to try purchasing tobacco products in the virtual store (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.67, P < .001). Banning ads had minimal impact on youth's purchase attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Policies that ban tobacco product displays at the POS may help reduce youth smoking by deterring youth from purchasing tobacco products at retail stores.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential impact of banning tobacco displays and ads at the point of sale (POS) on youth outcomes. METHODS: An interactive virtual convenience store was created with scenarios in which the tobacco product display at the POS was either openly visible (status quo) or enclosed behind a cabinet (display ban), and tobacco ads in the store were either present or absent. A national convenience sample of 1216 youth aged 13 to 17 who were either smokers or nonsmokers susceptible to smoking participated in the study. Youth were randomized to 1 of 6 virtual store conditions and given a shopping task to complete in the virtual store. During the shopping task, we tracked youth's attempts to purchase tobacco products. Subsequently, youth completed a survey that assessed their perceptions about the virtual store and perceptions about the ease of buying cigarettes from the virtual store. RESULTS: Compared with youth in the status quo condition, youth in the display ban condition were less aware that tobacco products were for sale (32.0% vs 85.2%) and significantly less likely to try purchasing tobacco products in the virtual store (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.67, P < .001). Banning ads had minimal impact on youth's purchase attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Policies that ban tobacco product displays at the POS may help reduce youth smoking by deterring youth from purchasing tobacco products at retail stores.
Authors: Cendrine D Robinson; Christine Muench; Emily Brede; Romano Endrighi; Edwin H Szeto; Joanna R Sells; John P Lammers; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Grant Izmirlian; Andrew J Waters Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Annice E Kim; James M Nonnemaker; Brett R Loomis; Paul R Shafer; Asma Shaikh; Edward Hill; John W Holloway; Matthew C Farrelly Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Keryn E Pasch; Nicole E Nicksic; Samuel C Opara; Christian Jackson; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Azieb W Kidanu; Rui Shi; Raul Cruz-Cano; Robert H Feldman; James Butler; Typhanye V Dyer; Craig S Fryer; Amitabh Varshney; Eric Lee; Pamela I Clark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: William G Shadel; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; Deborah M Scharf; Daniela Kusuke; Angela Sicker; Min Gong Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Ce Shang; Jidong Huang; Kai-Wen Cheng; Qing Li; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 3.390