Literature DB >> 23206837

Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial.

Robert A Byrne1, Franz-Josef Neumann, Julinda Mehilli, Susanne Pinieck, Britta Wolff, Klaus Tiroch, Stefanie Schulz, Massimiliano Fusaro, Ilka Ott, Tareq Ibrahim, Jörg Hausleiter, Christian Valina, Jürgen Pache, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Steffen Massberg, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best way to manage restenosis in patients who have previously received a drug-eluting stent is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and balloon angioplasty in these patients.
METHODS: In this randomised, open-label trial, we enrolled patients older than 18 years with restenosis of at least 50% after implantation of any limus-eluting stent at three centres in Germany between Aug 3, 2009, and Oct 27, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; stratified according to centre) to receive PEB, PES, or balloon angioplasty alone by means of sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated sequence. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but events and angiograms were assessed by individuals who were masked. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography at 6-8 months. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987324.
FINDINGS: We enrolled 402 patients, of whom 137 (34%) were assigned to PEB, 131 (33%) to PES, and 134 (33%) to balloon angioplasty. Follow-up angiography at 6-8 months was available for 338 (84%) patients. PEB was non-inferior to PES in terms of diameter stenosis (38·0% [SD 21·5] vs 37·4% [21·8]; difference 0·6%, one-sided 95% CI 4·9%; p(non-inferiority)=0·007; non-inferiority margin of 7%). Findings were consistent in per-protocol analysis (p(non-inferiority)=0·011). PEB and PES were superior to balloon angioplasty alone (54·1% [25·0]; p(superiority)<0·0001 for both comparisons). Frequency of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis did not differ between groups.
INTERPRETATION: By obviating the need for additional stent implantation, PEB could be a useful treatment for patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. FUNDING: Deutsches Herzzentrum.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206837     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61964-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  64 in total

1.  Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  In Sook Kang; Islam Shehata; Dong-Ho Shin; Jung-Sun Kim; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong-Ki Hong
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis-evidence for universal recommendation?

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Understanding and managing in-stent restenosis: a review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment.

Authors:  Dario Buccheri; Davide Piraino; Giuseppe Andolina; Bernardo Cortese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Refractory In-Stent Restenosis: Improving Outcomes by Standardizing Our Approach.

Authors:  Ron Waksman; Micaela Iantorno
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: balloons, stents and scaffolds.

Authors:  Roisin Colleran; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Treating restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Megan Cully
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Drug-coated balloon treatment in coronary artery disease: Recommendations from an Asia-Pacific Consensus Group.

Authors:  Ae-Young Her; Eun-Seok Shin; Liew Houng Bang; Amin Ariff Nuruddin; Qiang Tang; I-Chang Hsieh; Jung-Cheng Hsu; Ong Tiong Kiam; ChunGuang Qiu; Jie Qian; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Rosli Mohd Ali
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.737

8.  Treatment for in-stent restenosis: patient-specific decision rather than universal recommendation.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Jonghanne Park; Tae-Min Rhee; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Local paclitaxel induces late lumen enlargement in coronary arteries after balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  Franz X Kleber; Antonia Schulz; Matthias Waliszewski; Telse Hauschild; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Dietz; Bodo Cremers; Bruno Scheller; Yvonne P Clever
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Treatment of coronary de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only strategy.

Authors:  Antonia Schulz; Telse Hauschild; Franz X Kleber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.