Literature DB >> 23206734

Four-hour quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy.

Nathan R Treff1, Richard T Scott.   

Abstract

Embryonic comprehensive chromosomal euploidy may represent a powerful biomarker to improve the success of IVF. However, there are a number of aneuploidy screening strategies to consider, including different technologic platforms with which to interrogate the embryonic DNA, and different embryonic developmental stages from which DNA can be analyzed. Although there are advantages and disadvantages associated with each strategy, a series of experiments producing evidence of accuracy, safety, clinical predictive value, and clinical efficacy indicate that trophectoderm biopsy and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) may represent a useful strategy to improve the success of IVF. This Biomarkers in Reproductive Medicine special issue review summarizes the accumulated experience with the development and clinical application of a 4-hour blastocyst qPCR-based CCS technology.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206734     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Human blastocysts exhibit unique microrna profiles in relation to maternal age and chromosome constitution.

Authors:  Blair R McCallie; Jason C Parks; Alyssa L Strieby; William B Schoolcraft; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Dhruti Babariya; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Andrea Borini; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis guided by single-cell genomics.

Authors:  Niels Van der Aa; Masoud Zamani Esteki; Joris R Vermeesch; Thierry Voet
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Fast quantitative real-time PCR-based screening for common chromosomal aneuploidies in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Charlotte D'Hulst; Irena Parvanova; Delia Tomoiaga; Maria L Sapar; Paul Feinstein
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 9.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences?

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Raymond Anchan; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Hypomethylation and Genetic Instability in Monosomy Blastocysts May Contribute to Decreased Implantation Potential.

Authors:  Blair R McCallie; Jason C Parks; Alyssa L Patton; Darren K Griffin; William B Schoolcraft; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.