Literature DB >> 23206425

Urethral buttressing in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter surgery.

Markus Margreiter1, Alex Farr, Varun Sharma, Ingrid Schauer, Hans-Christoph Klingler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and feasibility of what we believe to be a novel technique of buttressing the urethra with a fibrin coated collagen fleece in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the presence of urethral atrophy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 consecutive men were treated with urethral buttressing for urethral atrophy during artificial urinary sphincter surgery. Continence, complications and patient reported outcomes were assessed by preoperative and postoperative pad use, chart review, patient interview and validated questionnaires.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD followup was 38 ± 3.0 months (median 34, range 23 to 71). One patient was excluded from further evaluation due to accidental iatrogenic urethral injury elsewhere. At 3-month followup the mean improvement in pad use was 5 ± 0.5 pads (median 5, range 2 to 9). Of 16 patients 9 (56%) and 2 (13%) used 1 and 0 pad per day, respectively. According to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire, 12 of 16 patients (75%) described their condition as much or very much better after surgery. Mean ± SD postoperative Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Index scores were 2 ± 0.8 (median 1, range 0 to 11) and 4 ± 1.0 (median 3, range 0 to 11), respectively. No intraoperative complications were observed. During followup 2 of 16 patients (13%) underwent placement of a second cuff due to unsatisfactory postoperative continence, 1 (6%) underwent artificial urinary sphincter revision for clean urethral erosion and 1 (6%) underwent revision for pump malfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Urethral buttressing with a collagen fleece appears to be a safe, feasible option for urethral atrophy in patients treated with artificial urinary sphincter implantation or revision.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206425     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Authors:  Craig Comiter
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  William O Brant; Bradley A Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Christopher Powell; Nejd Alsikafi; Christopher McClung; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke; Thomas G Smith; Joshua A Broghammer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

Authors:  Craig V Comiter; Amy D Dobberfuhl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-01-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.