Literature DB >> 23206133

The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles.

Charles Mullon1, Andrew Pomiankowski, Max Reuter.   

Abstract

Sexual antagonism (SA) occurs when an allele that is beneficial to one sex, is detrimental to the other. This conflict can result in balancing, directional, or disruptive selection acting on SA alleles. A body of theory predicts the conditions under which sexually antagonistic mutants will invade and be maintained in stable polymorphism under balancing selection. There remains, however, considerable debate over the distribution of SA genetic variation across autosomes and sex chromosomes, with contradictory evidence coming from data and theory. In this article, we investigate how the interplay between selection and genetic drift will affect the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. The effective population sizes can differ between the autosomes and the sex chromosomes due to a number of ecological factors and, consequently, the distribution of SA genetic variation in genomes. In general, we predict the interplay of SA selection and genetic drift should lead to the accumulation of SA alleles on the X in male heterogametic (XY) species and, on the autosomes in female heterogametic (ZW) species, especially when sexual competition is strong among males.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206133     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01728.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Y-linked Mendelian inheritance of giant and dwarf male morphs in shell-brooding cichlids.

Authors:  Sabine Wirtz Ocana; Patrick Meidl; Danielle Bonfils; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Antagonistic versus nonantagonistic models of balancing selection: characterizing the relative timescales and hitchhiking effects of partial selective sweeps.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Masculinization of the x chromosome in the pea aphid.

Authors:  Julie Jaquiéry; Claude Rispe; Denis Roze; Fabrice Legeai; Gaël Le Trionnaire; Solenn Stoeckel; Lucie Mieuzet; Corinne Da Silva; Julie Poulain; Nathalie Prunier-Leterme; Béatrice Ségurens; Denis Tagu; Jean-Christophe Simon
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.