Literature DB >> 22654531

A geometric analysis of mastectomy incisions: Optimizing intraoperative breast volume.

David Chopp1, Vinay Rawlani, Marco Ellis, Sarah A Johnson, Donald W Buck, Seema Khan, Kevin Bethke, Nora Hansen, John Ys Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The advent of acellular dermis-based tissue expander breast reconstruction has placed an increased emphasis on optimizing intraoperative volume. Because skin preservation is a critical determinant of intraoperative volume expansion, a mathematical model was developed to capture the influence of incision dimension on subsequent tissue expander volumes.
METHODS: A mathematical equation was developed to calculate breast volume via integration of a geometrically modelled breast cross-section. The equation calculates volume changes associated with excised skin during the mastectomy incision by reducing the arc length of the cross-section. The degree of volume loss is subsequently calculated based on excision dimensions ranging from 35 mm to 60 mm.
RESULTS: A quadratic relationship between breast volume and the vertical dimension of the mastectomy incision exists, such that incrementally larger incisions lead to a disproportionally greater amount of volume loss. The vertical dimension of the mastectomy incision - more so than the horizontal dimension - is of critical importance to maintain breast volume. Moreover, the predicted volume loss is more profound in smaller breasts and primarily occurs in areas that affect breast projection on ptosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to model the relationship between the vertical dimensions of the mastectomy incision and subsequent volume loss. These geometric principles will aid in optimizing intra-operative volume expansion during expander-based breast reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mastectomy incision; Mathematical model; Tissue expander; Volume

Year:  2011        PMID: 22654531      PMCID: PMC3328110          DOI: 10.1177/229255031101900201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  13 in total

1.  The apical angle: a mathematical analysis of the ellipse.

Authors:  B R Moody; J E McCarthy; R D Sengelmann
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Skin waste, vertex angle, and scar length in excisional biopsies: comparing five excision patterns--fusiform ellipse, fusiform circle, rhomboid, mosque, and S-shaped.

Authors:  Tamara Raveh Tilleman; Michael M Tilleman; Gertruud A M Krekels; Martino H A Neumann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The 30-degree angle revisited.

Authors:  Mitchell Klapper
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm).

Authors:  C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 5.  Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Vijay Bindingnavele; Mark Gaon; Ken S Ota; David A Kulber; Dong-Joon Lee
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Description of cutaneous excision and suture using a mathematical model.

Authors:  B Chretien-Marquet; V Caillou; D H Brasnu; S Bennaceur; T Buisson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  How to draw the skin ellipse for a mastectomy.

Authors:  N J Coombs; G T Royle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S L Spear; P M Parikh; E Reisin; N G Menon
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Catherine M Hannan; Shawna C Willey; Costanza Cocilovo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Immediate single-stage breast reconstruction using implants and human acellular dermal tissue matrix with adjustment of the lower pole of the breast to reduce unwanted lift.

Authors:  Bruce M Topol; Edward F Dalton; Teresa Ponn; Connie J Campbell
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  1 in total

1.  Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Mark W Clemens; Andrea L Pusic; Neil A Fine; Jennifer B Hamill; H Myra Kim; Ji Qi; Edwin G Wilkins; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.