Literature DB >> 23204645

Models provide specificity: Testing a proposed mechanism of visual working memory capacity development.

Vanessa R Simmering1, A Rebecca Patterson.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have established that visual working memory has a limited capacity, and that capacity increases during childhood. However, debate continues over the source of capacity limits and its developmental increase. Simmering (2008) adapted a computational model of spatial cognitive development, the Dynamic Field Theory, to explain not only the source of capacity limitations but also the developmental mechanism. According to the model, capacity is limited by the balance between excitation and inhibition that maintains multiple neural representations simultaneously. Moreover, development is implemented according to the Spatial Precision Hypothesis, which proposes that excitatory and inhibitory connections strengthen throughout early childhood. Critically, these changes in connectivity result in increasing precision and stability of neural representations over development. Here we test this developmental mechanism by probing children's memory in a single-item change detection task. Results confirmed the model's predictions, providing further support for this account of visual working memory capacity development.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23204645      PMCID: PMC3509784          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.001,

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Dev        ISSN: 0885-2014


  39 in total

1.  Goal neglect and working memory capacity in 4- to 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Stuart Marcovitch; Janet J Boseovski; Robin J Knapp; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

2.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  To Model or Not to Model? A Dialogue on the Role of Computational Modeling in Developmental Science.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Jochen Triesch; Gedeon O Deák; John P Spencer
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2010-08

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Rocket-ship psychophysics. Assessing visual functioning in young children.

Authors:  I Abramov; L Hainline; J Turkel; E Lemerise; H Smith; J Gordon; S Petry
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Generality with specificity: the dynamic field theory generalizes across tasks and time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; John P Spencer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Influence of Similarity on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Po-Han Lin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-04

10.  A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Steven J Luck; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-01
View more
  12 in total

1.  Tone series and the nature of working memory capacity development.

Authors:  Katherine M Clark; Kyle O Hardman; Todd R Schachtman; J Scott Saults; Bret A Glass; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

3.  The development of real-time stability supports visual working memory performance: Young children's feature binding can be improved through perceptual structure.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Chelsey M Wood
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-06-19

4.  Developmental improvements in the resolution and capacity of visual working memory share a common source.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Hilary E Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The co-development of looking dynamics and discrimination performance.

Authors:  Sammy Perone; John P Spencer
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-08-19

6.  Different developmental trajectories across feature types support a dynamic field model of visual working memory development.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Hilary E Miller; Kevin Bohache
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Coding of featural information in visual working memory in 2.5-year-old toddlers.

Authors:  Chen Cheng; Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 8.  Working Memory Maturation: Can We Get at the Essence of Cognitive Growth?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-03

9.  Beyond slots and resources: grounding cognitive concepts in neural dynamics.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Vanessa R Simmering; Aaron T Buss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Working memory capacity as a dynamic process.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Sammy Perone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.