Literature DB >> 34305310

Coding of featural information in visual working memory in 2.5-year-old toddlers.

Chen Cheng1,2, Zsuzsa Kaldy1, Erik Blaser1.   

Abstract

The number of objects that infants can remember in visual working memory (VWM) increases rapidly during the first few years of life (Kaldy & Leslie, 2005; Ross-Sheehy, Oakes, & Luck, 2003). However, less is understood about the representational format of VWM: whether storage is determined by fixed-precision memory slots, or the allocation of a limited continuous resource. In the current study, we adapted the Delayed Match Retrieval eye-tracking paradigm (Kaldy, Guillory, & Blaser, 2016), to test 2.5-year-old toddlers' ability to remember three object-location bindings when the to-be-remembered objects were all unique (Experiment 1) versus when they shared features such as color or shape (Experiment 2). 2.5-year-olds succeeded in Experiment 1, but only performed marginally better than chance in Experiment 2. Interestingly, when incorrect, participants in Experiment 2 were no more likely to select a decoy item that shared a feature with the target item. It seems that the increased similarity of to-be-remembered objects did not impair memory for the objects directly, but instead increased the likelihood of catastrophic forgetting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacity; Delayed Match Retrieval; Infants; Representational format; Visual working memory

Year:  2020        PMID: 34305310      PMCID: PMC8297794          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Dev        ISSN: 0885-2014


  40 in total

1.  Visual short-term memory in the first year of life: capacity and recency effects.

Authors:  S A Rose; J F Feldman; J J Jankowski
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2001-07

2.  A detection theory account of change detection.

Authors:  Patrick Wilken; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Age differences in visual working memory capacity: not based on encoding limitations.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Angela M AuBuchon; Amanda L Gilchrist; Timothy J Ricker; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-06-18

5.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Memory load affects object individuation in 18-month-old infants.

Authors:  Jennifer M Zosh; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-08-26

7.  How we categorize objects is related to how we remember them: The shape bias as a memory bias.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-07-22

8.  Delayed Match Retrieval: a novel anticipation-based visual working memory paradigm.

Authors:  Zsuzsa Kaldy; Sylvia B Guillory; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Development of visual working memory precision in childhood.

Authors:  Stephanie Burnett Heyes; Nahid Zokaei; Irene van der Staaij; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-04-21

10.  Focused attention predicts visual working memory performance in 13-month-old infants: A pupillometric study.

Authors:  Chen Cheng; Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Two-year-olds use past memories to accomplish novel goals.

Authors:  Tashauna L Blankenship; Melissa M Kibbe
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2021-09-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.