Literature DB >> 23204547

The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States.

Jeremy S Whang1, Stephen R Baker, Ronak Patel, Lyndon Luk, Alejandro Castro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the most frequent causes of malpractice suits as derived from credentialing data of 8401 radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Jersey Medical School. A total of 8401 radiologists in 47 states participating in the network of One-Call Medical, a broker for computed tomographic/magnetic resonance studies in workers' compensation cases, were required to provide their malpractice history as part of their credentialing application. Of these, 2624 (31%) radiologists had at least one claim in their career. In each enrollee's credentialing file, if there was a claim against the enrollee there was a narrative regarding each malpractice case from which, in most instances, a primary allegation could be discerned. Among the 4793 cases, an alleged cause could be derived from the narrative in 4043 (84%). Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 12 (2011; Stata, College Station, Tex) software.
RESULTS: The most common general cause was error in diagnosis (14.83 claims per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval {CI}: 14.19, 15.51]). In this category, breast cancer was the most frequently missed diagnosis (3.57 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 3.26, 3.91]), followed by nonspinal fractures (2.49 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 2.28, 2.72]), spinal fractures (1.32 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 1.16, 1.49]), lung cancer (1.26 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 1.11, 1.42]), and vascular disease (1.08 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 0.93, 1.24]). The category next in frequency was procedural complications (1.76 claims per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 1.58, 1.96]), followed by inadequate communication with either patient (0.40 claim per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 0.32, 0.50]) or referrer (0.71 claim per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 0.60, 0.84]). Radiologists had only a peripheral role in 0.92 claim per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 0.77, 1.10). Failure to recommend additional testing was a rare cause (0.41 claim per 1000 person-years [95% CI: 0.34, 0.50]).
CONCLUSION: Errors in diagnosis are, by far, the most common generic cause of malpractice suits against radiologists. In this category, breast cancer was the most frequently missed diagnosis, followed by nonvertebral fractures and spinal fractures. Failure to communicate and failure to recommend additional testing are both uncommon reasons for initiating a suit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23204547     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

Review 1.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Spinal-related malpractice suits against radiologists in the USA-rates, anatomic location, percent of adverse judgments, and average payments.

Authors:  Stephen R Baker; Valdis Lelkes; Ronak H Patel; Alejandro Castro; Uzair Sarmast; Jeremy Whang
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30

3.  Non-spinal musculoskeletal malpractice suits against radiologists in the USA--rates, anatomic locations, and payments in a survey of 8,265 radiologists.

Authors:  Stephen R Baker; Ronak H Patel; Valdis Lelkes; Alejandro Castro; Uzair Sarmast; Jeremy Whang
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31

Review 4.  Risk management in radiology departments.

Authors:  Horea Craciun; Kshitij Mankad; Jeremy Lynch
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-28

5.  An incidental giant preperitoneal fibrolipoma diagnosed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fatih Başak; Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Tolga Canbak; Metin Yücel; Aylin Acar; Abdullah Şişik; Gürhan Baş; Murat Hakan Karabulut; Gözde Kır
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-01-03

6.  Court decisions on medical malpractice.

Authors:  Jan-Paul Knaak; Markus Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Pediatric radiology malpractice claims - characteristics and comparison to adult radiology claims.

Authors:  Micheál A Breen; Kathy Dwyer; Winnie Yu-Moe; George A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 8.  Errors and malpractice lawsuits in radiology: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Busardò; Paola Frati; Alessandro Santurro; Simona Zaami; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Geras; Ritse M Mann; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Critical findings: timing of notification in neuroradiology.

Authors:  S E Honig; E L Honig; L B Babiarz; J S Lewin; B Berlanstein; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.