Literature DB >> 23202148

Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months.

Hubert T Faber1, Catharina A J Dun, Rik C Nelissen, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Cor W R J Cremers, Myrthe K S Hol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clinically evaluate the performance of a titanium percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant (BAHI) using a 3-week healing period. Short-term implant survival, stability changes, and skin reactions are evaluated from the initial implantation to 6 months postimplantation.
METHODS: Thirty patients eligible for a BAHI were included in an open, prospective clinical investigation. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the time of implantation and at 10 days; at 3, 6, and 12 weeks; and at 6 months after placement of the implant. Sound processor fitting was performed 3 weeks after implantation. Skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification.
RESULTS: One implant was lost 3 days after implantation because of poor bone quality. No implant loss occurred in the remaining 29 patients (96.7%). The mean ISQ value at the time of implantation was 67.1 (range, 44-71). Compared with baseline, there was a significant dip of -2.2 ISQ units at 10 days (mean, 65.7; p = 0.0093). There was a positive change in mean ISQ compared with baseline over the subsequent visits. No reduction in mean ISQ values was observed after implant loading. Skin reactions were observed incidentally (mean over all visits, 9.7%) and were generally mild (Holgers Grade 1; mean 9.0%). An adverse skin reaction (Holgers Grade 2) was observed only once (mean, 0.7%).
CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that loading the implant and 6-mm abutment with the sound processor at 3 weeks is safe. The stability of the implant as measured by ISQ values had reached its baseline value within 3 weeks after implantation. The degree of stability was not affected by implant loading. Only mild skin reactions were observed incidentally. This study supports the use of early loading at 3 weeks as current practice in healthy adults with good bone quality; thus, these adults can benefit from the rehabilitation of their hearing at an earlier stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23202148     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318277a282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  11 in total

1.  [Percutaneous titanium implants for bone conduction hearing aids: experience with 283 cases].

Authors:  P A Federspil; A Koch; M H Schneider; K Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Henricus P M Kunst; Ronald J E Pennings; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Stefan Bulla; Antje Aschendorff; Wolfgang Maier; Louisa Traser; Christian Steinmetz; Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival.

Authors:  Søren Foghsgaard; Per Caye-Thomasen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Mark Flynn; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Hubert T Faber; Catharina A J Dun; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christine A den Besten; Joacim Stalfors; Stina Wigren; Johan Ivarsson Blechert; Mark Flynn; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Rohini Aggarwal; Kevin Green; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Stability Testing of a Wide Bone-Anchored Device after Surgery without Skin Thinning.

Authors:  Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim G A Calon; Marc van Hoof; Herbert van den Berge; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Joost van Tongeren; Janny R Hof; Jan Wouter Brunings; Sofia Jonhede; Lucien J C Anteunis; Miranda Janssen; Manuela A Joore; Marcus Holmberg; Martin L Johansson; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.