AIMS: Post-translational modification of proteins by O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is cardioprotective but its role in cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC) and the reduced efficacy of rIPC in type 2 diabetes mellitus is unknown. In this study we achieved mechanistic insight into the remote stimulus mediating and the target organ response eliciting the cardioprotective effect by rIPC in non-diabetic and diabetic myocardium and the influence of O-GlcNAcylation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cardioprotective capacity and the influence on myocardial O-GlcNAc levels of plasma dialysate from eight healthy volunteers and eight type 2 diabetic patients drawn before and after subjection to an rIPC stimulus were tested on human isolated atrial trabeculae subjected to ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Dialysate from healthy volunteers exposed to rIPC improved post-ischaemic haemodynamic recovery (40 ± 6 vs. 16 ± 2%; P < 0.01) and increased myocardial O-GlcNAc levels. Similar observations were made with dialysate from diabetic patients before exposure to rIPC (43 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 2%; P < 0.001) but no additional cardioprotection or further increase in O-GlcNAc levels was achieved by perfusion with dialysate after exposure to rIPC (44 ± 4 and 42 ± 5 vs. 43 ± 3%; P = 0.7). The glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) inhibitor azaserine abolished the cardioprotective effects and the increment in myocardial O-GlcNAc levels afforded by plasma from diabetic patients and healthy volunteers treated with rIPC. CONCLUSIONS: rIPC and diabetes mellitus per se influence myocardial O-GlcNAc levels through circulating humoral factors. O-GlcNAc signalling participates in mediating rIPC-induced cardioprotection and maintaining a state of inherent chronic activation of cardioprotection in diabetic myocardium, restricting it from further protection by rIPC.
AIMS: Post-translational modification of proteins by O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is cardioprotective but its role in cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC) and the reduced efficacy of rIPC in type 2 diabetes mellitus is unknown. In this study we achieved mechanistic insight into the remote stimulus mediating and the target organ response eliciting the cardioprotective effect by rIPC in non-diabetic and diabetic myocardium and the influence of O-GlcNAcylation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cardioprotective capacity and the influence on myocardial O-GlcNAc levels of plasma dialysate from eight healthy volunteers and eight type 2 diabeticpatients drawn before and after subjection to an rIPC stimulus were tested on human isolated atrial trabeculae subjected to ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Dialysate from healthy volunteers exposed to rIPC improved post-ischaemic haemodynamic recovery (40 ± 6 vs. 16 ± 2%; P < 0.01) and increased myocardial O-GlcNAc levels. Similar observations were made with dialysate from diabeticpatients before exposure to rIPC (43 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 2%; P < 0.001) but no additional cardioprotection or further increase in O-GlcNAc levels was achieved by perfusion with dialysate after exposure to rIPC (44 ± 4 and 42 ± 5 vs. 43 ± 3%; P = 0.7). The glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase (GFAT) inhibitor azaserine abolished the cardioprotective effects and the increment in myocardial O-GlcNAc levels afforded by plasma from diabeticpatients and healthy volunteers treated with rIPC. CONCLUSIONS:rIPC and diabetes mellitus per se influence myocardial O-GlcNAc levels through circulating humoral factors. O-GlcNAc signalling participates in mediating rIPC-induced cardioprotection and maintaining a state of inherent chronic activation of cardioprotection in diabetic myocardium, restricting it from further protection by rIPC.
Authors: Donna M Lehman; Dong-Jing Fu; Angela B Freeman; Kelly J Hunt; Robin J Leach; Teresa Johnson-Pais; Jeanette Hamlington; Thomas D Dyer; Rector Arya; Hanna Abboud; Harald H H Göring; Ravindranath Duggirala; John Blangero; Robert J Konrad; Michael P Stern Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Niels P Riksen; Zhigang Zhou; Wim J G Oyen; Rogier Jaspers; Bart P Ramakers; Rene M H J Brouwer; Otto C Boerman; Neil Steinmetz; Paul Smits; Gerard A Rongen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-07-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S B Kristiansen; B Løfgren; N B Støttrup; D Khatir; J E Nielsen-Kudsk; T T Nielsen; H E Bøtker; A Flyvbjerg Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jarrod W Barnes; Liping Tian; Gustavo A Heresi; Carol F Farver; Kewal Asosingh; Suzy A A Comhair; Kulwant S Aulak; Raed A Dweik Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sujith Dassanayaka; Kenneth R Brittian; Andrea Jurkovic; Lauren A Higgins; Timothy N Audam; Bethany W Long; Linda T Harrison; Giuseppe Militello; Daniel W Riggs; Mitali G Chitre; Shizuka Uchida; Senthilkumar Muthusamy; Anna M Gumpert; Steven P Jones Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Richard D Semba; Hu Huang; Gerard A Lutty; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Gerald W Hart Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.494