Literature DB >> 23199278

On the genetic parameter determining the efficiency of purging: an estimate for Drosophila egg-to-pupae viability.

D Bersabé1, A García-Dorado.   

Abstract

The consequences of inbreeding on fitness can be crucial in evolutionary and conservation grounds and depend upon the efficiency of purging against deleterious recessive alleles. Recently, analytical expressions have been derived to predict the evolution of mean fitness, taking into account both inbreeding and purging, which depend on an 'effective purging coefficient (d(e) )'. Here, we explore the validity of that predictive approach and assay the strength of purging by estimating d(e) for egg-to-pupae viability (EPV) after a drastic reduction in population size in a recently captured base population of Drosophila melanogaster. For this purpose, we first obtained estimates of the inbreeding depression rate (δ) for EPV in the base population, and we found that about 40% was due to segregating recessive lethals. Then, two sets of lines were founded from this base population and were maintained with different effective size throughout the rest of the experiment (N = 6; N = 12), their mean EPV being assayed at different generations. Due to purging, the reductions in mean EPV experienced by these lines were considerably smaller than the corresponding neutral predictions. For the 60% of δ attributable to nonlethal deleterious alleles, our results suggest an effective purging coefficient d(e) > 0.02. Similarly, we obtain that d(e) > 0.09 is required to roughly account for purging against the pooled inbreeding depression from lethal and nonlethal deleterious alleles. This implies that purging should be efficient for population sizes of the order of a few tens and larger, but might be inefficient against nonlethal deleterious alleles in smaller populations.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23199278     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules.

Authors:  A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Detection of genetic purging and predictive value of purging parameters estimated in pedigreed populations.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Diego Bersabé; Jinliang Wang; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Jørgen Bundgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Mads Fristrup Schou; Kuke R Bijlsma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.832

5.  Predictive Model and Software for Inbreeding-Purging Analysis of Pedigreed Populations.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Jinliang Wang; Eugenio López-Cortegano
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Purging of deleterious burden in the endangered Iberian lynx.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman-Ruiz; Maria Lucena-Perez; Beatriz Villanueva; Jesús Fernández; Alexander P Saveljev; Mirosław Ratkiewicz; Krzysztof Schmidt; Nicolas Galtier; Aurora García-Dorado; José A Godoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Genetic load has potential in large populations but is realized in small inbred populations.

Authors:  Samarth Mathur; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Diego Bersabé; Armando Caballero; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with extremely low effective population sizes.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Eulalia Moreno; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.821

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.