Literature DB >> 23197870

Variability in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells: importance for disease modeling.

Alejandra M Vitale1, Nicholas A Matigian, Sugandha Ravishankar, Bernadette Bellette, Stephen A Wood, Ernst J Wolvetang, Alan Mackay-Sim.   

Abstract

In the field of disease modeling, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have become an appealing choice, especially for diseases that do not have an animal model. They can be generated from patients with known clinical features and compared with cells from healthy controls to identify the biological bases of disease. This study was undertaken to determine the variability in iPSC lines derived from different individuals, with the aim of determining criteria for selecting iPSC lines for disease models. We generated and characterized 18 iPSC lines from eight donors and considered variability at three levels: (a) variability in the criteria that define iPSC lines as pluripotent cells, (b) variability in cell lines from different donors, and (c) variability in cell lines from the same donor. We found that variability in transgene expression and pluripotency marker levels did not prevent iPSCs from fulfilling all other criteria for pluripotency, including teratoma formation. We found low interindividual and interclonal variability in iPSCs that fulfilled the most stringent criteria for pluripotency, with very high correlation in their gene expression profiles. Interestingly, some cell lines exhibited reprogramming instability, spontaneously regressing from a fully to a partially reprogrammed state. This was associated with a low percentage of cells expressing the pluripotency marker stage-specific embryonic antigen-4. Our study shows that it is possible to define a similar "ground state" for each cell line as the basis for making patient versus control comparisons, an essential step in order to identify disease-associated variability above individual and cell line variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197870      PMCID: PMC3659735          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  25 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: the promise of human induced pluripotent stem cell-based studies of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kristen J Brennand; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Guidelines and techniques for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Broader implications of defining standards for the pluripotency of iPSCs.

Authors:  George Q Daley; M William Lensch; Rudolf Jaenisch; Alex Meissner; Kathrin Plath; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 4.  Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray.

Authors:  Pan Du; Warren A Kibbe; Simon M Lin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons.

Authors:  John T Dimos; Kit T Rodolfa; Kathy K Niakan; Laurin M Weisenthal; Hiroshi Mitsumoto; Wendy Chung; Gist F Croft; Genevieve Saphier; Rudy Leibel; Robin Goland; Hynek Wichterle; Christopher E Henderson; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient.

Authors:  Allison D Ebert; Junying Yu; Ferrill F Rose; Virginia B Mattis; Christian L Lorson; James A Thomson; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  In-Hyun Park; Natasha Arora; Hongguang Huo; Nimet Maherali; Tim Ahfeldt; Akiko Shimamura; M William Lensch; Chad Cowan; Konrad Hochedlinger; George Q Daley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Generation of a human embryonic stem cell line encoding the cystic fibrosis mutation deltaF508, using preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Susan J Pickering; Stephen L Minger; Minal Patel; Hannah Taylor; Cheryl Black; Chris J Burns; Antigoni Ekonomou; Peter R Braude
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Fibroblast and lymphoblast gene expression profiles in schizophrenia: are non-neural cells informative?

Authors:  Nicholas A Matigian; Richard D McCurdy; François Féron; Christopher Perry; Heather Smith; Cheryl Filippich; Duncan McLean; John McGrath; Alan Mackay-Sim; Bryan Mowry; Nicholas K Hayward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  30 in total

1.  New markers for tracking endoderm induction and hepatocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Audrey Holtzinger; Philip R Streeter; Farida Sarangi; Scott Hillborn; Maryam Niapour; Shinichiro Ogawa; Gordon Keller
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Will brain cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells or directly converted from somatic cells (iNs) be useful for schizophrenia research?

Authors:  Cheryl Filippich; Ernst J Wolvetang; Bryan J Mowry
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  Current methods and challenges in the comprehensive characterization of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Joanna S T Asprer; Uma Lakshmipathy
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 4.  Stem cells on the brain: modeling neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases using human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Priya Srikanth; Tracy L Young-Pearse
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 1.250

Review 5.  Neural organoids for disease phenotyping, drug screening and developmental biology studies.

Authors:  Brigham J Hartley; Kristen J Brennand
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 6.  Modeling Inborn Errors of Hepatic Metabolism Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Behshad Pournasr; Stephen A Duncan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 7.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yosef Buganim; Dina A Faddah; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Alzheimer's disease: phenotypic approaches using disease models and the targeting of tau protein.

Authors:  Elisabetta Lauretti; Domenico Praticò
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 9.  Modelling inherited cardiac disease using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: progress, pitfalls, and potential.

Authors:  Alain van Mil; Geerthe Margriet Balk; Klaus Neef; Jan Willem Buikema; Folkert W Asselbergs; Sean M Wu; Pieter A Doevendans; Joost P G Sluijter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 10.  A Concise Review on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Personalized Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Pallavi Pushp; Diogo E S Nogueira; Carlos A V Rodrigues; Frederico C Ferreira; Joaquim M S Cabral; Mukesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.