| Literature DB >> 23197758 |
Behzad N Oskouei1, Guillaume Lamirault, Chacko Joseph, Adriana V Treuer, Stephanie Landa, Jose Da Silva, Konstantinos Hatzistergos, Marc Dauer, Wayne Balkan, Ian McNiece, Joshua M Hare.
Abstract
Whereas cardiac-derived c-kit(+) stem cells (CSCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are undergoing clinical trials testing safety and efficacy as a cell-based therapy, the relative therapeutic and biologic efficacy of these two cell types is unknown. We hypothesized that human CSCs have greater ability than MSCs to engraft, differentiate, and improve cardiac function. We compared intramyocardial injection of human fetal CSCs (36,000) with two doses of adult MSCs (36,000 and 1,000,000) or control (phosphate buffered saline) in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency mice after coronary artery ligation. The myocardial infarction-induced enlargement in left ventricular chamber dimensions was ameliorated by CSCs (p < .05 for diastolic and systolic volumes), as was the decline in ejection fraction (EF; p < .05). Whereas 1 × 10(6) MSCs partially ameliorated ventricular remodeling and improved EF to a similar degree as CSCs, 36,000 MSCs did not influence chamber architecture or function. All cell therapies improved myocardial contractility, but CSCs preferentially reduced scar size and reduced vascular afterload. Engraftment and trilineage differentiation was substantially greater with CSCs than with MSCs. Adult-cultured c-kit(+)CSCs were less effective than fetal, but were still more potent than high-dose MSCs. These data demonstrate enhanced CSC engraftment, differentiation, and improved cardiac remodeling and function in ischemic heart failure. MSCs required a 30-fold greater dose than CSCs to improve cardiac function and anatomy. Together, these findings demonstrate a greater potency of CSCs than bone marrow MSCs in cardiac repair.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23197758 PMCID: PMC3659683 DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med ISSN: 2157-6564 Impact factor: 6.940