Literature DB >> 23197333

Rewarding context accelerates implicit guidance in visual search.

Yuan-Chi Tseng1, Alejandro Lleras.   

Abstract

It is well known that observers can implicitly learn the spatial context of complex visual searches, such that future searches through repeated contexts are completed faster than those through novel contexts, even though observers remain at chance at discriminating repeated from new contexts. This contextual-cueing effect arises quickly (within less than five exposures) and asymptotes within 30 exposures to repeated contexts. In spite of being a robust effect (its magnitude is over 100 ms at the asymptotic level), the effect is implicit: Participants are usually at chance at discriminating old from new contexts at the end of an experiment, in spite of having seen each repeated context more than 30 times throughout a 50-min experiment. Here, we demonstrate that the speed at which the contextual-cueing effect arises can be modulated by external rewards associated with the search contexts (not with the performance itself). Following each visual search trial (and irrespective of a participant's search speed on the trial), we provided a reward, a penalty, or no feedback to the participant. Crucially, the type of feedback obtained was associated with the specific contexts, such that some repeated contexts were always associated with reward, and others were always associated with penalties. Implicit learning occurred fastest for contexts associated with positive feedback, though penalizing contexts also showed a learning benefit. Consistent feedback also produced faster learning than did variable feedback, though unexpected penalties produced the largest immediate effects on search performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23197333     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0400-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.

Authors:  David S Lee; Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Random reward priming is task-contingent: the robustness of the 1-trial reward priming effect.

Authors:  Arni G Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-10

Review 3.  Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Emmanouil Konstantinidis; David R Shanks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

4.  Contextual Cueing Effect in Spatial Layout Defined by Binocular Disparity.

Authors:  Guang Zhao; Qian Zhuang; Jie Ma; Shen Tu; Qiang Liu; Hong-Jin Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  Reward modulation of contextual cueing: Repeated context overshadows repeated target location.

Authors:  Fariba Sharifian; Oliver Contier; Claudia Preuschhof; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Contextual Cueing Accelerated and Enhanced by Monetary Reward: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Guang Zhao; Qian Zhuang; Jie Ma; Shen Tu; Shiyi Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Rewarding distractor context versus rewarding target location: a commentary on Tseng and Lleras (2013).

Authors:  Bernhard Schlagbauer; Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.

Authors:  Yuan-Chi Tseng; Joshua I Glaser; Eamon Caddigan; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.