Literature DB >> 23197009

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index.

Grzegorz Miekisiak1, Marta Kollataj, Jan Dobrogowski, Wojciech Kloc, Witold Libionka, Mariusz Banach, Dariusz Latka, Tomasz Sobolewski, Adam Sulewski, Andrzej Nowakowski, Grzegorz Kiwic, Adam Pala, Tomasz Potaczek, Maciej Gierlotka.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Validation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.
OBJECTIVE: To translate and culturally adapt a Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to validate its use in Polish patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ODI is among the most popular questionnaires used to evaluate back pain-related disability. To our knowledge no validated Polish version of the index was available at the time our study was initiated.
METHODS: The questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted by 2 independent translators and approved by expert committee. Final version was included in the booklet consisting in addition of a previously validated Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, VAS for low back and leg and 3 Likert scale questions (pain medications, pain frequency, disability). It was tested on 169 patients with chronic low back pain, 164 (97%) of them were enrolled, and 84 of 164 (53%) returned the completed retest booklet within 2 to 14 days after the baseline test. There were no differences between the 2 groups in demographic and clinical parameters. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were investigated.
RESULTS: The mean ODI (standard deviation [SD]) was 48.45 (18.94); minimum 2, maximum 94. The Cronbach α for baseline questionnaires (n = 164) was 0.90. Concurrent validity, measured by comparing ODI responses with the results of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score was very good (r = 0.607, P < 0.001). The correlation with VAS back was fair (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) and with VAS leg was good (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). The tested ODI had excellent test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 and standard error of measurements was 3.54, the resulting minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level was 10.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the Polish version of the ODI is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of disability in Polish-speaking patients with lower back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23197009     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827e948b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  Ivan Domazet; Jakob Nemir; Petra Barl; Krešimir Saša Đurić; Ivan Pašalić; Hrvoje Barić; Marin Stančić
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability and validity of Punjabi version of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  Dinesh Sandal; Rohit Jindal; Sandeep Gupta; Sudhir Kumar Garg
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Sedentary Lifestyle and Nonspecific Low Back Pain in Medical Personnel in North-East Poland.

Authors:  Anna Citko; Stanisław Górski; Ludmiła Marcinowicz; Anna Górska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of proprioceptive acuity of the cervical spine in healthy adults and adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Emmert; Corina Schuster-Amft; Eling D de Bruin; Michael A McCaskey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index.

Authors:  Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada; Oluwabunmi Esther Oguntoyinbo; Francis Oluwafunso Fasuyi; Opeyemi Ayodiipo Idowu; Adesola Christiana Odole; Olusola Ayanniyi; Olubusola Esther Johnson; Elkanah Ayodele Orimolade; Ajibola Babatunde Oladiran; Francis Fatoye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Urdu version of Oswestry disability index; a reliability and validity study.

Authors:  Fareeha Amjad; Mohammad A Mohseni-Bandpei; Syed Amir Gilani; Ashfaq Ahmad; Muhammad Waqas; Asif Hanif
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain.

Authors:  Ho Joong Kim; Joon Hee Park; Didier Bouhassira; Jae Hoon Shin; Bong Soon Chang; Choon Ki Lee; Chang Hyun Baek; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Risk Factors Associated with Low Back Pain among A Group of 1510 Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bryndal; Marian Majchrzycki; Agnieszka Grochulska; Sebastian Glowinski; Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  Assessment of pressure pain threshold at the cervical and lumbar spine region in the group of professionally active nurses: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Kołcz; Karolina Jenaszek
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Hamad S Al Amer; Fahad Alanazi; Mohamed ELdesoky; Ayman Honin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.