Literature DB >> 23196838

[Modern imaging techniques in patients with multiple myeloma].

P Bannas1, N Kröger, G Adam, T Derlin.   

Abstract

Imaging studies are essential for both diagnosis and initial staging of multiple myeloma, as well as for differentiation from other monoclonal plasma cell diseases. Apart from conventional radiography, a variety of newer imaging modalities including whole-body low-dose-CT, whole-body MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT may be used for detection of osseous and extraosseous myeloma manifestations. Despite of known limitations such as limited sensitivity and specificity and the inability to detect extraosseous lesions, conventional radiography still remains the gold standard for staging newly diagnosed myeloma, partly due to its wide availability and low costs. Whole-body low-dose CT is increasingly used due to its higher sensitivity for the detection of osseous lesions and its ability to diagnose extraosseous lesions, and is replacing conventional radiography at selected centres. The highest sensitivity for both detection of bone marrow disease and extraosseous lesions can be achieved with whole-body MRI or 18F-FDG PET/CT. Diffuse bone marrow infiltration may be visualized by whole-body MRI with high sensitivity. Whole-body MRI is at least recommended in all patients with normal conventional radiography and in all patients with an apparently solitary plasmacytoma of bone. To obtain the most precise readings, optimized examination protocols and dedicated radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians familiar with the complex and variable morphologies of myeloma lesions are required. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23196838     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  6 in total

1.  Vertebral lesion distribution in multiple myeloma--assessed by reduced-dose whole-body MDCT.

Authors:  Georg Bier; Christopher Kloth; Christoph Schabel; Malte Bongers; Konstantin Nikolaou; Marius Horger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bannas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 3.  The diagnostic imaging of bone metastases.

Authors:  Walter Heindel; Raphael Gübitz; Volker Vieth; Matthias Weckesser; Otmar Schober; Michael Schäfers
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Prognostic significance of 18F-sodium fluoride in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Brian Østergaard; Stephanie Mimms; William Y Raynor; Mahmoud Aly; Austin J Borja; Leila S Arani; Oke Gerke; Thomas J Werner; Hongming Zhuang; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim; Niels Abildgaard; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-25

5.  Assessing myeloma bone disease with whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with x-ray skeletal survey by region and relationship with laboratory estimates of disease burden.

Authors:  S L Giles; N M deSouza; D J Collins; V A Morgan; S West; F E Davies; G J Morgan; C Messiou
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Targeting paraprotein biosynthesis for non-invasive characterization of myeloma biology.

Authors:  Katharina Lückerath; Constantin Lapa; Annika Spahmann; Gerhard Jörg; Samuel Samnick; Andreas Rosenwald; Herrmann Einsele; Stefan Knop; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.