| Literature DB >> 23196336 |
Raoul Sutter1, Robert D Stevens, Peter W Kaplan.
Abstract
To identify the relationship between pathologic electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns, clinical and neuroradiological abnormalities, and outcome in hospitalized patients with acute encephalopathy. This 5-year cohort study was performed at an academic tertiary care center. EEGs in 154 patients with altered mental status were classified according to five predefined patterns: Isolated continuous slowing of background activity (theta, theta/delta, and delta activity) and patterns with slowing background activity with episodic transients [i.e., triphasic waves (TWs) or frontal intermittent delta activity (FIRDA)]. Clinical characteristics, blood tests and neuroimaging were compared among groups. Associations between EEG patterns and structural and non-structural abnormalities were calculated. Glasgow Outcome Score >3 at discharge was defined as favorable and 1-3 as unfavorable outcome. In multivariable analyses, theta was associated with brain atrophy (OR 2.6, p = 0.020), theta/delta with intracerebral hemorrhages (OR 6.8, p = 0.005), FIRDA with past cerebrovascular accidents (OR 2.7, p = 0.004), TWs with liver or multi-organ failure (OR 6, p = 0.004; OR 4, p = 0.039), and delta activity with alcohol/drug abuse with or without intoxication, and HIV infection (OR 3.8, p = 0.003; OR 9, p = 0.004). TWs were associated with death (OR 4.5, p = 0.005); theta/delta with unfavorable outcomes (OR 2.5, p = 0.033), while patients with FIRDA had favorable outcomes (OR 4.8, p = 0.004). In encephalopathic patients, well-defined EEG patterns are associated with specific pathological conditions and outcomes, suggesting that mechanistic hypotheses underlie these abnormal EEG patterns. To clarify the respective contributions of non-structural and structural abnormalities to encephalopathy reflected in specific EEG patterns, prospective studies using continuous EEG monitoring during the acute onset of encephalopathy are needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23196336 PMCID: PMC7102032 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6766-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol ISSN: 0340-5354 Impact factor: 4.849
Fig. 1Examples of the five different EEG patterns in encephalopathic patients: a generalized slow background activity of 4–7 Hz (theta); b generalized slow background activity of 4–7 Hz with intrusions of delta activity (theta/delta); c generalized delta background activity (delta); d repetitive intermittent electrographic elements consisting of three phases and a fronto-central or fronto-parietal predominance and a fronto-occipital or occipito-frontal time shift (triphasic waves); e repetitive intermittent rhythmic slow waves with a frequency of <4 Hz with a frontal predilection (FIRDA)
Demographics and clinical features of patients with different EEG patterns in encephalopathy (n = 154)
| Demoghraphics | Theta ( | Theta/delta ( | Delta ( | Triphasic waves ( | FIRDA ( |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||
| Gender | |||||||||||
| Female | 17 | 50 | 20 | 63 | 12 | 43 | 23 | 68 | 16 | 62 | 0.272 |
| Male | 17 | 50 | 12 | 37 | 16 | 57 | 11 | 32 | 10 | 38 | |
| Age (years)a | 67 ± 18 | 66 ± 13 | 54 ± 19 | 68 ± 16 | 57 ± 19 |
| |||||
| Clinical features | |||||||||||
| Principal diagnoses | |||||||||||
| Infections | 19 | 56 | 18 | 56 | 12 | 43 | 16 | 47 | 7 | 27 | 0.203 |
| Respiratory tract infections | 3 | 9 | 11 | 34 | 5 | 18 | 11 | 32 | 5 | 19 | 0.068 |
| Urinary tract infections | 10 | 29 | 9 | 28 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 8 | 0.127 |
| Bacteremia | 7 | 21 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 21 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 0.127 |
| Meningitis/Encephalitis | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.324 |
| Endocarditis | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Dementia | 12 | 35 | 6 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 0.270 |
| Intracerebral hemorrhage | 1 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0.781 |
| Subdural hemorrhage | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.554 |
| Tumor (outside the CNS) | 3 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 0.279 |
| Brain tumor | 2 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0.740 |
| Acute ischemic stroke | 3 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0.822 |
| Hydrocephalus | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 0.804 |
| HIV-infection | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Traumatic brain injury | 3 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.670 |
| Intoxication | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Posterior reversible encephalopathy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.106 |
| Medication or drug withdrawal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.480 |
| Comorbidities | |||||||||||
| Arterial hypertension | 23 | 68 | 19 | 28 | 20 | 71 | 24 | 71 | 15 | 58 | 0.712 |
| Diabetes mellitus type 2 | 10 | 29 | 9 | 28 | 9 | 32 | 13 | 38 | 7 | 27 | 0.877 |
| Coronary artery disease | 8 | 24 | 7 | 22 | 6 | 21 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 12 | 0.806 |
| Known Epilepsy | 9 | 27 | 6 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 27 | 0.112 |
| Past cerebrovascular accident | 7 | 21 | 7 | 22 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 31 |
|
| Autoimmundisease | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.233 |
| Risk factors | |||||||||||
| Smoking | 6 | 18 | 10 | 31 | 13 | 46 | 10 | 29 | 12 | 46 | 0.086 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 5 | 15 | 9 | 28 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 27 | 2 | 8 | 0.152 |
| Alcohol abuse | 4 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 0.207 |
| Drug abuse | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 4 |
|
| Critical illness | |||||||||||
| Renal insufficiency | 19 | 56 | 22 | 69 | 18 | 64 | 21 | 62 | 5 | 19 |
|
| Respiratory failure | 3 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0.248 |
| Liver insufficiency | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Septic shock | 4 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.186 |
| ARDS or ALI | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.782 |
| Additional findings on brain CT or MRI | |||||||||||
| White matter changes | 19 | 56 | 24 | 75 | 20 | 71 | 24 | 71 | 15 | 58 | 0.391 |
| Mild | 4 | 12 | 6 | 19 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 27 | 6 | 23 | 0.414 |
| Moderate | 8 | 24 | 11 | 34 | 9 | 32 | 9 | 27 | 6 | 23 | 0.818 |
| Marked | 7 | 21 | 7 | 22 | 8 | 29 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 12 | 0.633 |
| Atrophy | 22 | 65 | 13 | 41 | 10 | 36 | 15 | 44 | 9 | 35 | 0.108 |
| Mild | 9 | 27 | 6 | 19 | 6 | 21 | 7 | 21 | 7 | 27 | 0.533 |
| Moderate | 11 | 32 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 32 | 2 | 8 |
|
| Marked | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.501 |
CNS central nervous system, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ALI acute lung injury, HIV human immunodeficiency virus
Bold p values = significant
* Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables; Pearson’s Chi-square test with Fisher’s exact test were appropriate for categorical variables
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD
Fig. 2Mean of lowest GCS on day of EEG in patient groups with one particular EEG pattern. GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, FIRDA frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity. Adjusted for the use of intravenous (IV) anesthetic drugs
Associations between structural and non-structural abnormalities and particular EEG patterns in encephalopathic patients (n = 154)
| Crude | Adjusteda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormalities/EEG patterns | OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI |
|
| Brain atrophy | ||||||
| Theta | 2.8 | 1.29–6.29 |
| 2.8 | 1.29–6.29 |
|
| Theta/delta | 0.9 | 0.39–1.88 | 0.702 | |||
| Delta | 0.7 | 0.30–1.59 | 0.383 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 1.0 | 0.47–2.18 | 0.968 | |||
| FIRDA | 0.5 | 0.23–1.32 | 0.178 | |||
| Intracerebral hemorrhage | ||||||
| Theta | 0.4 | 0.05–3.06 | 0.359 | |||
| Theta/delta | 6.8 | 1.79–25.9 |
| 7.4 | 1.64–33.3 |
|
| Delta | 1.1 | 0.23–5.66 | 0.878 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 0.4 | 0.05–3.06 | 0.359 | |||
| FIRDA | – | No patients | – | |||
| Past cerebrovascular accident | ||||||
| Theta | 1.4 | 0.53–3.62 | 0.515 | |||
| Theta/delta | 1.5 | 0.57–4.01 | 0.399 | |||
| Delta | 0.3 | 0.07–1.47 | 0.145 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 0.3 | 0.06–1.12 | 0.070 | |||
| FIRDA | 2.7 | 1.03–7.17 |
| 3.6 | 1.13–11.2 |
|
| Posterior reversible encephalopathy | ||||||
| Theta | – | No patients | – | |||
| Theta/delta | – | No patients | – | |||
| Delta | 7.4 | 1.18–46.8 |
| 4.9 | 0.65–37.1 | 0.124 |
| Triphasic waves | 0.9 | 0.09–8.13 | 0.909 | |||
| FIRDA | 1.2 | 0.13–11.6 | 0.850 | |||
| HIV-infection | ||||||
| Theta | 0.5 | 0.06–4.12 | 0.511 | |||
| Theta/delta | 0.5 | 0.06–4.47 | 0.559 | |||
| Delta | 8.9 | 1.99–39.9 |
| 6.4 | 1.18–35.2 |
|
| Triphasic waves | 0.5 | 0.06–4.12 | 0.511 | |||
| FIRDA | – | No patients | – | |||
| Alcohol abuse, drug abuse, or Intoxication | ||||||
| Theta | 0.7 | 0.28–1.97 | 0.544 | |||
| Theta/delta | 0.3 | 0.09–1.12 | 0.074 | |||
| Delta | 3.8 | 1.55–9.07 |
| 2.7 | 1.03–7.13 |
|
| Triphasic waves | 1.2 | 0.47–2.89 | 0.735 | |||
| FIRDA | 0.6 | 0.20–1.95 | 0.413 | |||
| Renal insufficiency | ||||||
| Theta | 1.0 | 0.48–2.23 | 0.927 | |||
| Theta/delta | 2.1 | 0.90–4.71 | 0.087 | |||
| Delta | 1.6 | 0.68–3.70 | 0.287 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 1.4 | 0.65–3.08 | 0.384 | |||
| FIRDA | 0.1 | 0.05–0.40 |
| 0.2 | 0.05–0.51 |
|
| Liver insufficiency | ||||||
| Theta | – | No patients | – | |||
| Theta/delta | 0.7 | 0.15–3.59 | 0.715 | |||
| Delta | 1.6 | 0.16–0.36 | 0.527 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 6.0 | 1.76–20.2 |
| 11.3 | 2.11–60.5 |
|
| FIRDA | – | No patients | – | |||
| Multiorgan failure | ||||||
| Theta | – | No patients | – | |||
| Theta/delta | 1.0 | 0.19–4.71 | 0.950 | |||
| Delta | 2.0 | 0.49–8.44 | 0.325 | |||
| Triphasic waves | 4.0 | 1.07–14.6 |
| 6.0 | 1.24–29.4 |
|
| FIRDA | – | No patients | – | |||
FIRDA frontal intermittend rhythmic delta activity, HIV human immunodeficiency virus infection
Bold p values = significant
aMultivariable logistic regression model adjusted for all characteristics with significant values in the overall comparison (Table 1), as well as adjustment for the use of IV anesthetic drugs
Fig. 3Differences of mean serum levels of urea and ammonia (NH3) in patients with one of the five EEG patterns. NH Ammonia, FIRDA frontal intermitted rhythmic delta activity
Categorical and continuous short-term outcomes (n = 154)
|
| % | OR | 95 % CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discharge destination* | |||||
| Back home | |||||
| Theta | 14 | 41 | 1.7 | 0.73–3.88 | 0.226 |
| Theta/delta | 7 | 22 | 0.4 | 0.17–1.09 | 0.075 |
| Delta | 6 | 21 | 0.2 | 0.07–0.65 |
|
| Triphasic waves | 12 | 35 | 1.1 | 0.48–2.54 | 0.817 |
| FIRDA | 18 | 69 | 4.4 | 1.72–11.40 |
|
| Rehabilitation | |||||
| Theta | 4 | 12 | 0.6 | 0.19–1.95 | 0.408 |
| Theta/delta | 4 | 13 | 0.6 | 0.20–2.02 | 0.450 |
| Delta | 13 | 46 | 9.5 | 3.40–26.3 |
|
| Triphasic waves | 2 | 6 | 0.2 | 0.05–1.10 | 0.066 |
| FIRDA | 3 | 12 | 0.6 | 0.15–2.06 | 0.385 |
| Another hospital | |||||
| Theta | 4 | 12 | 4.7 | 1.06–20.8 |
|
| Theta/delta | 1 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.07–4.89 | 0.608 |
| Delta | 2 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.23–7.26 | 0.775 |
| Triphasic waves | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| FIRDA | 1 | 4 | 0.6 | 0.07–5.04 | 0.619 |
| Skilled nursing facility | |||||
| Theta | 9 | 97 | 0.8 | 0.34–2.03 | 0.689 |
| Theta/delta | 13 | 41 | 2.1 | 0.90–4.72 | 0.088 |
| Delta | 6 | 21 | 0.9 | 0.32–2.52 | 0.849 |
| Triphasic waves | 10 | 29 | 1.0 | 0.41–2.31 | 0.956 |
| FIRDA | 4 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.15–1.53 | 0.218 |
| Death | |||||
| Theta | 2 | 6 | 0.2 | 0.05–1.17 | 0.077 |
| Theta/delta | 7 | 22 | 2.7 | 0.90–7.92 | 0.078 |
| Delta | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Triphasic waves | 10 | 29 | 4.5 | 1.57–12.70 |
|
| FIRDA | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| GOS (categorical)* | |||||
| GOS >3 | |||||
| Theta | 16 | 47 | 1.2 | 0.52–2.69 | 0.694 |
| Theta/delta | 10 | 31 | 0.4 | 0.17–0.93 |
|
| Delta | 15 | 54 | 0.9 | 0.35–2.14 | 0.748 |
| Triphasic waves | 14 | 41 | 0.8 | 0.34–1.74 | 0.530 |
| FIRDA | 21 | 81 | 4.8 | 1.63–13.90 |
|
| GOS 1–3 | |||||
| Theta | 17 | 50 | 0.8 | 0.37–1.93 | 0.694 |
| Theta/delta | 22 | 69 | 2.5 | 1.08–5.98 |
|
| Delta | 12 | 43 | 1.2 | 0.47–2.89 | 0.748 |
| Triphasic waves | 20 | 59 | 1.3 | 0.58–2.92 | 0.530 |
| FIRDA | 5 | 19 | 0.2 | 0.07–0.61 |
|
FIRDA frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity, GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale
Bold p values = significant
* Data regarding outcome were missing for two patients (one for the theta, one for the delta group)
** Multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age
*** Multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age